Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Production Practices Influenced Yield and Commercial Cane Sugar Level of Contract Sugarcane Farmers in Thailand

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many farmers in Thailand grow sugarcane under contract farming, which is a potential system to support sugarcane product management from farm to sugar factory. Contract farming system has potential advantages to both farmers and agribusiness companies. The farmers receive input support, production services, credit support, appropriate technology, skill transfer and guaranteed and fixed pricing from agribusiness companies. Agribusiness companies that make the contract with farmers have ensured product and receive quality product. Two major problems of sugarcane production under contract farming in Thailand are low yield and low quality which is dependent on production practice. The objective of this research was to investigate the influence of different production factors on cane yield and commercial cane sugar level of sugarcane grown under contract farming system in Thailand. The data were collected from a farm survey through individual interview of contract sugarcane farmers from three sugar mills located at Lopburi, Saraburi and Nakhon Sawan Provinces, Thailand. A total of 270 farmers belonging to small, medium and large farm sizes were selected. The results showed that irrigation, chemical fertilizer application and farm size significantly influenced cane yield and accounted for 82 % of the variation in yield. Timely delivery from farm to sugar mill and crop age of sugarcane during harvesting were the factors significantly related to the quality of sugarcane product typically measured by commercial cane sugar value and accounted for 71.8 % of the variation in sugarcane quality. Good management practice in sugarcane farm is important to increase yield and commercial cane sugar level. Farmers can obtain higher cane yield by providing adequate irrigation depending on the need during different crop growth stages and application of chemical fertilizers based on soil analysis. These practices can be better managed under small farms where farmers have greater control. The quality of sugarcane can be improved by harvesting at optimum maturity period and minimizing delivery time of the harvested product from farm to sugar mill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam, M.K., G.M.A. Hossain, A.M. Haque, M.S. Bokhtiar, and C.G. Paul. 2009. Influence of NPK on advanced promising clones of sugarcane at two different agro-ecological zones of Bangladesh. Pakistan Sugar Journal 24: 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertson, P.L., and C.P.L. Grof. 2004. The effect of hexose upon Pol, Brix and calculated CCS in sugarcane: A potential for negative Pol bias in juice from actively growing cane. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 24: 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Pippo, W., C.A. Luengo, J. Koehlinger, P. Garzone, and G. Cornacchia. 2008. Sugarcane energy use: The Cuban case. Energy Policy 36: 2163–2181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 2007. Office of the Cane and Sugar Board (OCSB). Report on cane crushing and sugar production 2006/2007 (The end of crushing season series). Bangkok: Ministry of Industry, Thailand.

  • Anonymous. 2013. Crop water information: Sugarcane. Land and Water Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

  • Anonymous. 2014. OCSB. Report of sugarcane plantation area in crop year 2013/2014. Bangkok: Ministry of Industry, Thailand.

  • Ashfaq, M., Z.M. Naseer, S. Hassan, and A.I. Baig. 2008. Factors affecting the income from major crops in rice-wheat ecological zone. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 45: 504–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijman, J. 2008. Contract farming in developing countries: An overview. Working Paper. Wageningen University, The Netherlands. https://www.wageningenur.nl/upload_mm/5/c/b/79333121-6f4b-4f86-9e8e-0a1782e784d6_ReviewContractFarming.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2015.

  • Boontham, A.D., Sophanodora, N. Kajarnpol, P. Thumtong, and C. Aree. 1995. Effect of various duration of cane left in the field after burning before harvesting on yield and sugar content. In Proceedings of the 33rd Kasetsart University Annual Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 47–56.

  • Chen, J.H. 2006. The combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers and/or biofertilizer for crop growth and soil fertility. In International Workshop on Sustained Management of the Soil-Rhizosphere System for Efficient Crop Production and Fertilizer Use. Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1–11.

  • Da Silva, C. 2005. The growing role of contract farming in agri-food systems development: Drivers, theory and practice. Agricultural Management, Marketing and Finance Service, FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ags/publications/AGSF_WD_9.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2015.

  • Delforge, I. 2007. Contract farming in Thailand: A view from the farm. Occasional Papers 2. A report for Focus on the Global South. http://focusweb.org/pdf/occasional-papers2-contract-farming.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2015.

  • Johnson, A. 2005. Making markets work better for the poor. Linking farmers to markets through contract farming. In Proceeding of an M4P (Making Markets Work Better for the Poor)/An Giang University Workshop. Asian Development Bank (ADB).

  • Key, N., and D. Runsten. 1999. Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: The organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World Development 27: 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A.I., A. Khatri, S.G. Nizamani, A.M. Siddiqui, and A.N. Dahar. 2005. Effect of NPK fertilizers on the growth of sugarcane clone AEC86-347 developed at Nia, Tando Jam. Pakistan Journal of Botany 37: 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masakure, O., and S. Henson. 2005. Why do small-scale producers choose to produce under contract? Lessons from nontraditional vegetable exports from Zimbabwe. World Development 33: 1721–1733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naritoom, C. 2000. Contract farming in Central Plain: A case study of asparagus grower groups in Nakhon Pathom Province. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Chao Phraya Delta: Historical Development, Dynamics and Challenges of Thailand’s Rice Bowl. Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 97–117.

  • OCSB. 2012. Report on cane crushing and sugar production 2011/2012 (The end of crushing season series). Ministry of Industry, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Patrick, I. 2004. Contract farming in Indonesia: Smallholders and agribusiness working together. Technical Reports, 54. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Canberra, Australia. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/113792/2/tr54.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2015.

  • Paul, G.C., and M.A. Mannan. 2007. An integrated nutrient management approach to improve sugar productivity. Sugar Tech 9: 28–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perera, M.S., C. Sivayoganathan, and M. Wijeratne. 2003. Technical knowledge and adoption of farming practices to farmer level extension communication of outgrower farmers of Sri Lankan sugar industry. Sugar Tech 5: 121–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puengpa, N., and A. Boontham. 2012. Study on the optimum quantity of irrigation water application for different stages of sugarcane growth. In Proceedings of the 9th National Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Conference, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand, pp. 2241–2247.

  • Setboonsarng, S. 2008. Global partnership in poverty reduction: Contract farming and regional cooperation. ADB Institute Discussion Paper, 89. http://www.fao.org/uploads/media/ADBI%20global%20partnership%20poverty%20reduction.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2015.

  • Setboonsarng, S., Leung, P.S., and J. Cai. 2006. Contract farming and poverty reduction: The case of organic rice contract farming in Thailand. ADB Institute Discussion Paper, 49. http://www.adbi.org/files/2006.05.dp49.pr.organic.farming.thailand.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2015.

  • Soomro, A.F., S. Tunio, F.C. Oad, I. Rajper, M.I. Khuhro, and M.Y. Arain. 2012. Effect of supplemental inorganic NPK and residual organic nutrients on sugarcane ratoon crop. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research 3: 01–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriboonchitta, S., and A. Wiboonpoongse. 2008. Overview of contract farming in Thailand: Lessons learned. ADB Institute discussion paper 112. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. http://adbi.adb.org/files/dp112.contract.farming.thailand.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2015.

  • Van Eeden, M., and L. Korsten. 2013. Factor determining use of biological disease control measures by the avocado industry in South Africa. Crop Protection 51: 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedenfeld, B., and J. Enciso. 2004. Sugarcane irrigation in South Texas: A review. Subtropical Plant Science 56: 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives of Thailand and the Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand, for providing financial assistance with a scholarship to the first author for graduate studies at the Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Systems and Engineering, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand

    Sukunya Tukaew, Avishek Datta & Ganesh P. Shivakoti

  2. Department of Agricultural Extension, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand

    Sukunya Tukaew

  3. UMR G-EAU/Water Engineering and Management, School of Engineering and Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand

    Damien Jourdain

Authors
  1. Sukunya Tukaew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Avishek Datta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ganesh P. Shivakoti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Damien Jourdain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avishek Datta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tukaew, S., Datta, A., Shivakoti, G.P. et al. Production Practices Influenced Yield and Commercial Cane Sugar Level of Contract Sugarcane Farmers in Thailand. Sugar Tech 18, 299–308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-015-0403-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-015-0403-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation