Abstract
This paper introduces a Bayesian approach for composite quantile regression employing the skewed Laplace distribution for the error distribution. We use a two-level hierarchical Bayesian model for coefficient estimation and future selection which assumes a prior distribution that favors sparseness. An efficient Gibbs sampling algorithm is developed to update the unknown quantities from the posteriors. The proposed approach is illustrated via simulation studies and two real datasets. Results indicate that the proposed approach performs quite good in comparison to the other approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alhamzawi R (2013) Brq:bayesian estimation and variable selection for quantile regression models
Alhamzawi R (2015) Model selection in quantile regression models. J Appl Stat 42(2):445–458
Alhamzawi R (2016) Bayesian model selection in ordinal quantile regression. Comput Stat Data Anal 103:68–78
Alhamzawi R, Yu K (2014) Bayesian Lasso-mixed quantile regression. J Stat Comput Simul 84(4):868–880
Asirvatham J (2009) Examining diet quality and body mass index in rural areas using a quantile regression framework. Rev Reg Stud 39(2):149–169
Bae K, Mallick B (2004) Gene selection using a two-level hierarchical Bayesian model. Bioinformatics 20:3423–3430
Bottai M, Frongillo EA, Sui X, O’Neill JR, McKeown RE, Burns TL, Liese AD, Blair SN, Pate RR (2014) Use of quantile regression to investigate the longitudinal association between physical activity and body mass index. Obesity 22(5):E149–E156
Bradic J, Fan J, Wang W (2011) Penalized composite quasi-likelihood for ultrahigh dimensional variable selection. J R Stat Soc Ser B 73:325–349
Brownlee KA (1965) Statistical methodology in science and engineering, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Burgette LF, Reiter JP (2012) Modeling adverse birth outcomes via confirmatory factor quantile regression. Biometrics 68:92–100
Cade BS, Barry NR (2003) A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologistis. Front Ecol Environ 1:412–420
Chhikara R, Folks L (1989) The inverse gaussian distribution: theory, methodology, and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York
Davidova S, Kostov P (2013) A quantile regression analysis of the effect of farmers’ attitudes and perceptions on market participation. J Agric Econ 64:2013
Fan J, Li RZ (2001) Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1348–1360
Figueiredo M (2001) Adaptive sparseness using Jeffreys prior. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 697–704
Geraci M, Bottai M (2007) Quantile regression for longitudinal data using the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Biostatistics 8:140–154
Heinz G, Peterson LJ, Johnson RW, Kerk CJ (2003) Exploring relationships in body dimensions. J Stat Educ 11(2)
Hu Y, Gramacy RB, Lian H (2013) Bayesian quantile regression for single-index models. Stat Comput 23(4):437–454
Huang H, Chen Z (2015) Bayesian composite quantile regression. J Stat Comput Simul 85(18):3744–3754
Kai B, Li R, Zou H (2010) Local composite quantile regression smoothing: an efficient and safe alternative to local polynomial regression. J R Stat Soc Ser B 72(1):49–69
Khare K, Hobert JP (2012) Geometric ergodicity of the Gibbs sampler for Bayesian quantile regression. J Multivar Anal 112:108–116
Kocherginsky M, He X, Mu Y (2005) Practical confidence intervals for regression quantiles. J Comput Graph Stat 14:41–55
Koenker R, Bassett GJ (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50
Koenker R, Geling O (2001) Reappraising medfly longevity: a quantile regression survival analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 96(454):458–468
Koenker R, Hallock K (2001) Quantile regression: an introduction. J Econ Perspect 15(4):43–56
Koenker R, Machado JAF (1999) Goodness of fit and related inference processes for quantile regression. J Am Stat Assoc 94:1296–1310
Komunjer I (2005) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation for conditional quantiles. J Econom 128:137–164
Kozumi H, Kobayashi G (2011) Gibbs sampling methods for Bayesian quantile regression. J Stat Comput Simul 81:1565–1578
Li Q, Xi R, Lin N (2010) Bayesian regularized quantile regression. Bayesian Anal 5:533–556
Lum K, Gelfand A (2012) Spatial quantile multiple regression using the asymmetric Laplace process. Bayesian Anal 7:235–258
Park T, Casella G (2008) The Bayesian lasso. J Am Stat Assoc 103:681–686
Reed C (2011) Bayesian parameter estimation and variable selection for quantile regression. School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics. Brunel University, Technical report, Department of Mathematics
Reed C, Dunson D, Yu K (2009) Bayesian variable selection in quantile regression. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Brunei University, Relatorio Técnico
Reich BJ (2012) Spatiotemporal quantile regression for detecting distributional changes in environmental processes. J R Stat Soc Ser C 61(4):535–553
Reich BJ, Fuentes M, Dunson DB (2011) Bayesian spatial quantile regression. J Am Stat Assoc 106(493):6
Sun W, Ibrahim JG, Zou F (2010) Genomewide multiple-loci mapping in experimental crosses by iterative adaptive penalized regression. Genetics 185:349–359
Wei Y, He X et al (2006) Conditional growth charts. Ann Stat 34(5):2069–2097
Yi N, Xu S (2008) Bayesian Lasso for quantitative trait loci mapping. Genetics 179:1045–1055
Yu K, Moyeed RA (2001) Bayesian quantile regression. Stat Probab Lett 54:437–447
Yu K, Stander J (2007) Bayesian analysis of a Tobit quantile regression model. J Econom 137:260–276
Yuan Y, Yin G (2010) Bayesian quantile regression for longitudinal studies with nonignorable missing data. Biometrics 66:105–114
Zhao Z, Xiao Z (2011) Efficient regressions via optimally combining quantile information. Econom Theory 1–43
Zou H, Yuan M (2008) Composite quantile regression and the oracle model selection theory. Ann Stat 36:1108–1126
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
A description of the Body dimensions dataset can be found on the Brq package: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Brq/index.html. Here is a table listing briefly the dataset frame for 507 observations on 25 regressors including the outcome (weight).
y | Weight (kg) |
\(x_1\) | Gender |
\(x_2\) | Age (years) |
\(x_3\) | Height (cm) |
\(x_4\) | Biacromial diameter (cm) |
\(x_5\) | Biiliac diameter, or “pelvic breadth” (cm) |
\(x_6\) | Bitrochanteric diameter (cm) |
\(x_7\) | Chest depth (cm) |
\(x_8\) | Chest diameter (cm) |
\(x_9\) | Elbow diameter (cm) |
\(x_{10}\) | Wrist diameter (cm) |
\(x_{11}\) | Knee diameter (cm) |
\(x_{12}\) | Ankle diameter (cm) |
\(x_{13}\) | Shoulder girth (cm) |
\(x_{14}\) | Chest girth (cm) |
\(x_{15}\) | Waist girth (cm) |
\(x_{16}\) | Navel (or ”Abdominal”) girth |
\(x_{17}\) | Hip girth (cm) |
\(x_{18}\) | Thigh girth (cm) |
\(x_{19}\) | Bicep girth (cm) |
\(x_{20}\) | Forearm girth (cm) |
\(x_{21}\) | Knee girth (cm) |
\(x_{22}\) | Calf maximum girth (cm) |
\(x_{23}\) | Ankle minimum girth (cm) |
\(x_{24}\) | Wrist minimum girth (cm) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alhamzawi, R. Bayesian Analysis of Composite Quantile Regression. Stat Biosci 8, 358–373 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-016-9158-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-016-9158-8