Abstract
The relations among students’ motivational beliefs, cognitive processes, and academic achievement were investigated. A 51-item questionnaire together with a mathematics achievement test was administered to 459 fifth graders in Korean elementary school mathematics classrooms. Results indicated that, in general, students’ cognitive processes related closely to competence beliefs, task values, and achievement goals, and more importantly their success or failure in mathematics achievement was closely linked to competence beliefs, performance-avoidance goals, and persistence strategies. Positive evidence of performance-approach goals was observed in math learning relative to task goals. As expected, performance-avoidance goals turned out to be detrimental to students’ math learning. These findings are generally congruent with the motivational theories and support the position that students should be encouraged to adopt task goals and actively involve themselves in math class activities. However, it also behooves us to recognize the potential benefits of performance-approach goals in different cultural contexts, such as the Korean elementary school math classrooms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260.
Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811–831. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310805.
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for windows user’s guide. CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task-values, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.23.
Diem, R. A., Levy, T., & Van Sickle, R. (1997). Korean Education: Focusing on the future. Special Education, 61, 83–87.
Eaton, M. J., & Dembo, M. H. (1997). Differences in the motivational beliefs of Asian American and non-Asian students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 433–440. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.433.
Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectations, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to seed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.
Ellinger, T. R., & Beckham, G. M. (1997). South Korea: Placing education on the top of the family agenda. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 624–625.
Ellinger, T. R., & Carlson, D. L. (1990). Education in Korea: Doing well and feeling bad. Foreign Service Journal, 67, 16–18.
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 218–232.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461.
Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on course performance: Goals, perceived ability, and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181–192. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0015.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638.
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97. doi:10.2307/1129640.
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.
Kloosterman, P. (1988). Self-confidence and motivation in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 345–351. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.345.
Kloosterman, P., & Cougan, M. C. (1994). Students’ beliefs about school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 375–388. doi:10.1086/461773.
Krauthammer, C. (1990, February 5). Education: Doing bad and feeling good. Time. Retrieved September 1, 2007, from http://www.time.com/time/magazine.
Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512.
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientation and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514.
Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710–718. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.710.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M., Urdan, T., Anderman, L., et al. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113–131. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0965.
Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388–422. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0028.
Ministry of Education. (2002). Educational statistics system 2002 [on-line], Available: http://210.122.126.23.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). MA: Boston College.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2002). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000 [on-line], Available: http://www.pisa.oecd.org/Docs/Download/PISAExeSummary.pdf.
Paik, S. (2001). Educational productivity in South Korea and the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1017.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.
Pintrich, P. R., Zusho, A., Schiefele, U., & Pekrum, R. (2001). Goal orientation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom: A cross-cultural comparison. In F. Salili, C. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp. 149–169). New York: Plenum.
Rao, N., Moely, B., & Sachs, J. (2000). Motivational beliefs, study strategies, and mathematics attainment in high and low-achieving Chinese secondary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 287–316. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1003.
Seo, D. (1999, April). The effects of cooperative learning on task appraisal, goal orientation, and strategic activity in Korean elementary school mathematics class. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the New England Educational Research Organization, Portsmouth, NH.
Seo, D., & Kim, J. (2001). Expanding a goal mediational model: The Korean elementary school math class. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5, 177–183.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. MA: Nedham Heights.
Sorenson, C. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38, 10–35. doi:10.1086/447223.
Stevens, R. J., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1991). The effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main idea instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 8–16. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.8.
Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C., & Lee, S. H. (1993). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American Children: Ten years later. Science, 259, 53–58. doi:10.1126/science.8418494.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.
Whang, P. A., & Hancock, G. R. (1994). Motivation and mathematics achievement: Comparison between Asian-American and non-Asian American students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 302–322. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1023.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P.
Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., Freedman-Doan, C., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Arbreton, A. J. A., et al. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seo, D., Taherbhai, H. Motivational beliefs and cognitive processes in mathematics achievement, analyzed in the context of cultural differences: a Korean elementary school example. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 10, 193–203 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9017-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9017-0