Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Can transformational leadership influence on teachers’ commitment towards organization, teaching profession, and students learning? A quantitative analysis

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of transformational leadership as idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration on teachers’ commitment towards organization, teaching profession, and students’ learning. A quantitative survey method was applied, and four broadly hypothesized relationships were tested with a sample of 1,014 trained non-graduate and graduate teachers serving in twenty-seven secondary schools in Sarawak, Malaysia. The results indicate a moderate level of teachers’ commitment and a low level of transformational leadership qualities among the respondents. This study found that inspirational motivation, individualized consideration, and intellectual stimulation were the factors contributing towards teachers’ commitment to teaching profession, and there was no dominant factor influencing commitment to students’ learning. Moreover, it was discovered that inspirational motivation was a factor to teachers’ efficacy and teaching experience. Besides, teachers’ efficacy and teaching experience were predictors to teachers’ commitment to organization, teaching profession, and students’ learning, respectively. These findings revealed that there was a significant relationship between transformational leadership and teachers’ commitment to organization and teaching profession, but not students’ learning. The results of this study indicate the necessity for leadership development of school leaders so that they could systematically acquire and internalize the effective transformational leadership qualities that are crucial in changing teachers’ attitude and improving their commitment towards their profession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeyemi, T. O. (2008). Teachers’ teaching experience and students’ learning outcomes in secondary schools in Ondo State. Nigeria. Educational Research and Review, 3(6), 204–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoroso, P. F. (2002). The impact of transformational leadership behaviors on teacher commitment and teacher job satisfaction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seton Hall University, South Orange: NJ.

  • Anderson, G., & Arsenault, N. (2002). Fundamentals of educational research. London: Roultedge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Transformational and charismatic leadership: Assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the LLQ and the CKS. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, K. A., Barling, K., & Kelloway, E. K. (2001). Transformational leadership or the iron cage: Which predicts trust, commitment and team efficacy? Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 22, 315–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1997). Replicated confirmatory factor analysis of the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Binghamton, NY: Center for leadership studies, Binghamton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2001). Practice of social research (8th ed.). New Work: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbuto, J. E. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(4), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. In M. M. Chemes & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and direction (pp. 49–88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Rigglo, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1984). Transformative power and leadership. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice (pp. 64–71). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E., Bound, J., & Machin, S. (1997). Implications of skill-based technological change: International evidence. NBER Working Paper no. 6166.

  • Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Leadership-tests-and-scales: Factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP), 80, 468–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Y. P. (2009). Advanced research statistic univariate and multivariate tests. Shah Alam: McGraw Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, S. J., Steed, L., & Dzidic, P. (2006). SPSS version 13.0 for windows. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (2007). Commitment before and after: An evaluation and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 336–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D. T. (1997). Roadmap to restructuring: Charting the course of change in American Education (2nd ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management: University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research; planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson International Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danetta, V. (2002). What factors influence a teacher’s commitment to student learning? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(2), 144–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study developing successful principals. Stanford Educational Leadership Institute. Retrieved from|: http://sell.stamford.edu/research/documents/SELI_sls.

  • Day, C. (2000). Beyond transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., Elliot, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, Standard and teacher identity: Challenge of sustaining teacher commitment. Teacher and Teacher Education, 21, 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Singleton, C. A. (2004). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools: Examining the effects of team structures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

  • Dumdum, U. R., Lowe, K. B., & Avolio, B. J. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In B. J. Avolio & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (pp. 35–36). Amsterdam: JAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education and Training Policy division. (2008). Improving school leadership. Volume 1: Policy and practice. Directorate for Education, Education and Training Policy Division.

  • Elliott, B., & Crosswell, L. (2001). Commitment to teaching Australia perspective to the interplays of the professional and the personal in teachers’ lives. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Teacher commitment at the European Conference on Educational Research, Little, France.

  • Fauziah, N., Mohd, R. R., Ghani, R., Aripin, R., & Darus, Z. (2008). Teacher professionalisation and organizational commitment: Evidence from Malaysia. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi, MARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A. (1996). Images of teaching and proposals for reform: A comparison of ideas from cognitive and organizational research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(2), 209–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63, 489–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresko, B., Kfir, D., & Nasser, F. (1997). Predicting teaching commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(4), 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1996). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 420–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1997). What’s worth fighting for in the principal-ship? (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2002). Leadership and sustainability (Vol. 3, No. (4), pp. 1–9) Paper presented in the National Association of Secondary Schools Principals.

  • Geijsel, Femke., Sleegers, P., & van den Berg, R. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort towards school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, N., & Mann, L. (2004). Transformational leadership and shared values: the building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 588–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givens, Roger. (2008). Emerging leadership journey. School of Global Leadership & Entrepreneurship, Regent University, 1(1), 4–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, K. C. (1996). Running ahead: Enhancing teacher commitment. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67(1), 45–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 527–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hailey, V. H., Farndale, E., & Truss, C. (2005). The HR department’s role in organizational performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Jr. Joseph F., Black, William C., Babin, Barry J., Anderson., Rolph E., & Tatham, Ronald L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458. ISBN 0-13-032929-0.

  • Hall, J., Johnson, S., Wysocki, A., & Kepner, K. (2002). Transformational leadership: The transformation of managers and associates. Retrieved from http://www.edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S. M. (1992). Facilitative leadership: The imperative for change. Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn-Turpin, F. D. (2009). A study examining the effects of transformational leadership behaviors on the factors of teaching efficacy, job satisfaction and organizational commitment as perceived by special education teachers. Virginia: Blacksburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp. 189–207). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control and support for innovation: Key predictors of business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K., & Sabo, D. J. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (1997). The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook for change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M. (1998). Transformational leadership style and job satisfaction: A comparative study between. Retrieved from: http://ep3.uum.edu.my/1680/1/jazmi_bin_md_isa.pdf.

  • Jaros, S. J. (1997). An assessment of Meyer and Allen’s (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanaugh, A. L. (2005). Introduction to principalship. In J. Shen (Ed.), School principals. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terbong, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushman, J. W. (1992). The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership for large-scale reform: The case of England’s national literacy and numeracy strategies. Journal of School Leadership and Management, 24(1), 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D., & Genge, M. (1996). Transformational school leadership. In K. Leithwood, et al. (Eds.), The international handbook of educational leadership and administration. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S. (1998). Effects of teacher quality work life in secondary schools on commitment and sense of efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunenburg, F. C., Lunenburg, F. C., & Irby, B. (2006). The principalship: Version to action (1st ed.). Belmont: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, L. J., & Crow, G. M. (2003). Being a becoming a principal: Role conceptions for contemporary principals and assistant principals. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBurney, D. H. (2001). Research method. USA: Wards worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, E. K. (2003). Ten traits of highly effective principals. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2008). Research education: Evidence-based Inquiry (6th ed.). New York: Pearson, International Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertzens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organization commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace, Theory, research and application. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Smith, C. A. (2000). HRM practices and organizational commitment: Test of a mediation model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17(4), 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Majid, K. (2005). Educational research methods. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa and Pustaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngodo, O. E. (2008). Procedural justice and trust:  The link in the transformational leadership – organizational outcomes relationship.  International Journal of Leadership Studies, 4(1), 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguni, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organization commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, C. (2001). The legal and regulatory environment for electronic information. Tetbury: Infonortics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (2nd ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C., & Williams, E. (1999). Fairness perception and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25(6), 897–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D., & Meyer, J. P. (2004). Becker’s side-bet theory revisited: A test of the theory within the context of Meyer and Allen’s three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, L. W., Roberts, J. T., & Hilliard, H. M. (1998). Fear of crime and collective action: An analysis of coping strategies. Sociological Inquiry, 68(3), 312–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, P. (1990). Teachers’ and their workplace: Commitment, performance and productivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riehl, C., & Sipple, J. W. (1996). Making the most of time and talent: Secondary school organizational climates, teaching task environments, and teacher commitment. American Journal of Educational Research, 33(4), 873–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of Education, 93, 352–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowold, J., & Heinitz, K. (2007). Transformational and charismatic leadership: Assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the MLQ and the CKS. Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business, a skill-building approach (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). Leadership: What’s it for school?. New York: Routledger, Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serviovanni, T. J. (1992). Why we should seek substitutes for leadership. Educational Leadership, 5, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifah S. J. (2012). Professional training and the relationship with personality traits, skills managing and leading among novice principals and head teachers in Malaysia. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, National University of Malaysia.

  • Sillins, H. C. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and school Improvement, 5(3), 272–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simic, I. (1998). Transformational leadership—The key to successful management of transformational organizational changes. Facta Universitas, 1(6), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, C. B. (2007). The relationships among middle level leadership, teacher commitment, teacher collective efficacy, and student achievement. Columbia: Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Missouri-Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M., Perttula, K. H., & Xin, K. (2005). Traditionality matters: An examination of the effectiveness of teachers in the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, K. T., & Cheng, Y. C. (1999). School organizational health and teacher commitment: A contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B. A., & Russell, R. F. (2004). The influence of the transformational leader. Journal of Leadership &Organizational Studies, 10(4), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting educational research (5th ed.). Belmost: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. W., Goodman, M., & Soloman, C. B. (2006). Organizational health, middle school programs, and student success: Findings from a national study of highly successful middle level schools. Middle Level Research Annual. Westemile, OH: National Middle School Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., & Lawler, J. J. (2003). Building effective organizations: Transformational leadership, collectivist orientation, work-related attitudes, and withdrawal behaviors in three emerging economies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 1083–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, S. D. (2003). Mentoring beginning special education teachers and the relationship to attrition. Exceptional Children, 66, 546–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2005). Research Methods in education: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. E. (1998). User interface design: Bridging the gap from requirements to design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2010). Leadership in organization (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Malaya (UM), 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Mohammed Sani Ibrahim, Simin Ghavifekr, Sii Ling, Saedah Siraj & Mohd Ibrahim K. Azeez

Authors
  1. Mohammed Sani Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simin Ghavifekr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sii Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saedah Siraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohd Ibrahim K. Azeez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simin Ghavifekr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, M.S., Ghavifekr, S., Ling, S. et al. Can transformational leadership influence on teachers’ commitment towards organization, teaching profession, and students learning? A quantitative analysis. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 15, 177–190 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9308-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9308-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation