Skip to main content
Log in

Crustal evolution and tectonics of the Archean Bundelkhand craton, Central India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

Magnetotelluric studies over the Bundelkhand craton indicates a high resistivity sub-structure, typically observed in the Archean-Proterozoic regions. The geoelectric section shows a single high resistivity layer in the northern part of the craton, extending from surface to a depth of about 60 km and a three layered resistivity structure overlying a conductive bottom in its southern part. The geological studies reported earlier have delineated an EW trending zone of ultramafic rocks, called the Bundelkhand tectonic zone (BTZ), which marks the divide between the two electrical resistivity patterns. The geoelectric structure is broadly indicative of a northward dipping tectonic fabric in this region which conforms to the Himalayan subduction, to the immediate north of this craton. However this observation cannot explain the findings from geochemical, isotope analysis and geological studies, suggesting possible vertical block movements in the region, which are also indicated in the Bouguer gravity studies. The geoelectric structure beneath the Vindhyan group to the south shows low resistivities even up to 60 km, suggesting that the Bundelkhand craton which is characterized by high resistivity rocks, does not extend to the south beneath the Vindhyans, as was believed by the earlier researchers. A low resistivity body with an extremely high conductance of about 100,000 Siemens is delineated at the mid crustal depths beneath the exposed Bijawars south of Bundelkhand craton. The causative factors behind this low resistivity are not immediately apparent, but some possibilities are discussed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, B.N.P., Das, L.K., Chakravorty, K. and Sivaji, Ch. (1993) Analysis of the Bouguer anomaly over Central India: A regional perspective. Mem. Geol. Soc. India, no.31, pp.469–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokarn, S.G., Rao, C.K., Gupta, G., Singh, B.P. and Yamashita, M. (1901) Deep crustal structure in central India using magnetotelluric studies. Geophys. Jour. Internat., v.144, pp.685–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groom, R.W. and Bailey, R.C. (1989) Decomposition of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor in the presence of local three-dimensional galvanic distortions. Jour.Geophys Res., v.94, pp.1913–1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaila, K.L, Murty, P.R.K., Mall, D.M., Dixit, M.M. and Sarkar, D. (1987) Deep seismic sounding along Hirapur-Mandla profile, central India. Geophys. Jour. Royal. Astr. Soc., v.89, pp.399–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malviya, V.P., Makoto, A., Pati, J.K. and Kaneko, Y. (1906) Petrology and geochemistry of metamorphosed basaltic pillow lava and basaltic Komatiite in the Mauranipur area: subduction related volcanism in the Archean Bundelkhand craton, Central India. Jour. Miner. Petrol. Sci., v.101, pp.199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pati, J.K., Patel, S.C., Pruseth, K.L., Malviya, V.P., Arima, M., Raju, S., Pati, P. and Prakash, K. (1907) Geology and Geochemistry of giant quartz veins from the Bundelkhand Craton, Central India and their implications, Jour. Earth. Syst. Sci., v.116(6), pp.497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshy, M.N. and Warsi, W.E.K. (1975) Role of regional gravity surveys in a concept oriented exploration programme. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.16, pp.44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raval, U. and Veeraswamy, K. (1907) Within and beyond the Protocontinents: Some geophysical aspects reflecting geodynamics of the Indian continental lithosphere, Int. Assoc. Gondwana Res. Mem. No.10, pp.263–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravi Shankar, (1988) Heat flow map of India and discussions on its geological and economic significance. Indian Minerals, v.42, pp.89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodi, W. and Mackie, R.L. (1901) Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2D magnetotelluric inversions. Geophysics, v.66, pp.174–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senthiappan, M. (1981) Geology of the area along Raksa Shear zone, Jhansi District, Uttar Pradesh. Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ., no.3, pp.73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K.K. and Rahman, (1900) The early archaeanpalaeoproterozoic crustal growth of the Bundelkhand craton. In: M. Deb (Ed.), Northern Indian Shield. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, pp.51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.P., Singh, A.N. and Singh, Y. (1907) Lineament fabrics and major shear zones in Bundelkhand and tectonic interpretation from IRS-ID data. Himalayan Geology, Abstract vol.28, pp.47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. G. Gokarn.

Additional information

Deceased, Feb. 2011

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gokarn, S.G., Rao, C.K., Selvaraj, C. et al. Crustal evolution and tectonics of the Archean Bundelkhand craton, Central India. J Geol Soc India 82, 455–460 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-013-0176-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-013-0176-6

Keywords

Navigation