Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic behaviour analysis of power generating unit in thermal power plant using fuzzy methodology

  • Application Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this research is to study the stochastic behaviour of a PGU (power generating unit) of a medium size coal fired thermal power plant using fuzzy methodology (FM). The PN approach was used to depict series and parallel configurations of the subsystems constituting the PGU. To study the failure dynamics of the considered system, various reliability parameters such as failure rate, repair time, MTBF, ENOF, availability and reliability of the system were computed using fuzzy λ-τ approach. RCA was conducted to determine the failure causes of various subsystems of the PGU. FMEA was carried out to determine the RPN scores of the various failure causes of different components. On the basis of these RPN scores, critical components were identified and ranked on the basis of criticality. Further, the limitations of the traditional FMEA approach were overcome by introducing a Fuzzy decision support system (FDSS). Findings of this study would be communicated to field engineers/system analysts of the considered system to help them understand and anticipate system behavior, and implement appropriate and effective maintenance policies for improving system availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aksu, S., Aksu, S., Osman, T.: Reliability and availability of pod propulsion systems. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 22(4), 41–58 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cai, K.Y.: System failure engineering and fuzzy methodology: an introductory overview. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 83, 113–133 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Modarres, M., Kaminsky, M.P.: Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar, S., Kumar, D., Mehta, N.P.: Steady state behaviour and maintenance planning of a desulphurization system in a urea fertilizer plant. Microelectron. Reliab. 37(6), 949–953 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arora, N., Kumar, D.: Stochastic analysis and maintenance planning of ash handling system in thermal power plant. Microelectron. Reliab. 37(5), 819–834 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arora, N., Kumar, D.: Availability analysis of steam and power generation systems in thermal power plant. Microelectron. Reliab. 37, 795–799 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sii, H.S., Ruxton, S.H., Wang, J.T.: A fuzzy logic based approach to qualitative safety modeling for marine systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 73, 19–34 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sergaki, A., Kalaitzakis, K.: A fuzzy knowledge based method for maintenance planning in a power system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 77, 19–30 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soroudi, A.: Possibilistic-scenario model for DG impact assessment on distribution networks in an uncertain environment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27(3), 1283–1293 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Soroudi, A., Ehsan, E.: IGDT based robust decision making tool for DNOs in load procurement under severe uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4(2), 886–895 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soroudi, A., Amraee, T.: Decision making under uncertainty in energy systems: state of the art. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 28, 376–384 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Soroudi, A.: Robust optimization based self scheduling of hydro-thermal Genco in smart grids. Energy 61(1), 262–271 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Knezevic, J., Odoom, E.R.: Reliability modeling of repairable systems using Petri nets and fuzzy Lambda-Tau methodology. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 73(1), 1–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma, R.K., Kumar, D., Kumar, P.: FM—a pragmatic tool to model, analyze and predict complex behavior of industrial systems. Eng. Comput. 24, 319–346 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garg, H., Sharma, S.P.: Behaviour analysis of synthesis unit in fertilizer plant. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 29(2), 217–232 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Panchal, D., Kumar, D.: Reliability analysis of CHU system of a coal fired thermal power plant using fuzzy λ-τ approach. In: 12th global congress on manufacturing and management, Procedia Engineering, 97, 2323–2332 (2014)

  17. Sharma, K., Sharma, S.P., Kumar, D.: RAM analysis of repairable industrial system utilizing uncertain data. Appl. Soft Comput. 10, 1208–1221 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma, S.P., Kumar, D., Kumar, A.: Behaviour prediction of washing system in a paper industry using GA and fuzzy lambda tau technique. Appl. Math. Model. 36(6), 2614–2626 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma, R.K., Sharma, P.: Integrated framework to optimize RAM and cost decision in process plant. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 25, 883–904 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guimarães, A.C.F., Lapa, C.M.F.: Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on nuclear engineering systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 7(1), 17–28 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma, R.K., Kumar, D., Kumar, P.: Systematic failure mode and effect analysis using fuzzy linguistic modeling. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 22(9), 886–1004 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumru, M., Kumru, P.Y.: Fuzzy FMEA application to improve purchase process in public hospital. Appl. Soft Comput 13, 721–733 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biondini, F., Bontempi, F., Malerba, P.G.: Fuzzy reliability analysis of concrete structures. Comput. Struct. 82(13–14), 1033–1052 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Savoia, M.: Structural reliability analysis through fuzzy number approach, with application to stability. Comput. Struct. 80(12), 1087–1102 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, J., Yang, J.B., Wang, J., Sii, W.: Engineering system safety analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 21, 387–411 (2005). doi:10.1002/qre.668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mustapha, F., Sapun, S.M., Ismail, N., Mokhtar, A.S.: A computer based intelligent system for fault diagnosis of an aircraft engine. Eng. Comput. 21(1), 78–90 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Popstojanova, K.G., Trivedi, K.S.: Architecture-based approach to reliability assessment of software systems. Perform. Eval. 45(2/3), 179–204 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Konstandinidou, M., Nivolianitou, Z., Kiranoudis, C., Markatos, N.: A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for reliability. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91(6), 706–716 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang, H.C., Weng, M.C.: Using fuzzy approaches to evaluate quality improvement alternative based on quality costs. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 19(2), 122–136 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, Y.Q., Wang, S.Q., Dulaimi, M., Low, S.P.: A fuzzy quality function deployment system for build able design decision-makings. Autom. Constr. 12(4), 381–393 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Adamyan, A., He, D.: Analysis of sequential failures for assessment of reliability and safety of manufacturing systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 76, 227–236 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, T.S., Chiou, S.B.: The application of Petri nets to failure analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 57, 129–1428 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Petri, C.A.: Communication with Automata. PhD thesis: University of Bonn, Technical Report (English) RADC-TR-65-377, Giriffis (NY): Rome Air Development Center (1962)

  34. Peterson, J.L.: Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bowles, J.B.: An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and Criticality analysis. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 380-6 (2003)

  36. Ebeling, C.: An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering. Tata McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tay, K.M., Lim, C.P.: Fuzzy FMEA with a guided rules reduction system for prioritization of failures. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 23(8), 1047–1066 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Connor, P.D.T.: Practical Reliability Engineering. Heyden, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xu, K., Tang, L.C., Xie, M.: Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 75, 17–29 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kokso, B.: Fuzzy Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ross, T.J.: Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tanaka, K.: An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic for Practical Applications. Springer, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, and Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers. World Scientific, Singapore (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Zimmermann, H.: Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications, 3rd edn. Kluwer, London (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Singh, C., Dhillion, B.S.: Engineering Reliability: New Techniques and Applications. Wiley, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Klir, G.J., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Application. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks to Mr. Manish Malik, Assistant Engineer, Mechanical, coal fired thermal power plant, dist. Panipat, Haryana, India for providing every possible help for this work. I would also like to thank Indian institute of technology, Roorkee, India, to provide the research facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilbagh Panchal.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

1.1 Nomenclature

FDSS

Fuzzy decision support system

λ i

Failure rate of components, i = 1, 2, 3 …. n

PN

Petrinet

τ i

Repair time of components, i = 1, 2, 3 …. n

FM

Fuzzy methodology

λ (α)

Interval for fuzzy failure rate

RCA

Root cause analysis

τ (α)

Interval for fuzzy repair time

FTA

Fault tree analysis

O d

Probability of non detection

FMEA

Failure mode effect analysis

s

Severity of failure

MF

Membership function

O f

Probability of occurrence of failure

TFN

Triangular fuzzy number

HPT

High pressure turbine

FRPN

Fuzzy risk priority number

LPT

Low pressure turbine

TMF

Triangular membership function

IPT

Intermediate pressure turbine

FMF

Fuzzy membership function

  

Degree of membership of element X in fuzzy set A

  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panchal, D., Kumar, D. Stochastic behaviour analysis of power generating unit in thermal power plant using fuzzy methodology. OPSEARCH 53, 16–40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-015-0219-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-015-0219-4

Keywords

Navigation