Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to a structure under 2-out-of-3:F modeling

  • Application Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lack of consistency in reliability modeling under human failure can lead to inconsistent conclusions. However, fuzzy logic allows an address to the ambiguity in reliability modeling. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the comprehensively used multi-criteria decision making methods. This paper reveals the application of fuzzy AHP in a structure consisting of a 2-out-of-3:F substructure under human failure. In reliability engineering, failure is a major concern for system design, planning and operations and it is imperative to focus more on system failures. The novelty of this paper is that the major failure rates of the system are selected and the weight of each failure rate is calculated after constructing a pair wise comparison matrix. The fuzzy reliability index is then evaluated with the help of the linguistic variables considered by experts in the form of performance ratings of different reliability indexes, and then the reliability is measured using multi-criteria decision making technique. The contribution of the paper is the ranking of failure rates which shows the relative importance of each failure rate and how it affects the overall system reliability to decide on a desirable action plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang, S., Watada, J.: Modelling redundancy allocation for a fuzzy random parallel–series system. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 232(2), 539–557 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ram, M., Chandna, R.: Fuzzy system availability analysis with different membership functions of system failure mode. Eng. Autom. Problems. 44–50 (2013)

  3. Chandna, R., Ram, M.: Fuzzy reliability modeling in the system failure rates merit context. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 5(3), 245–251 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu, H.C.: Fuzzy Bayesian system reliability assessment based on exponential distribution. Appl. Math. Model. 30(6), 509–530 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yadav, O.P., Singh, N., Chinnam, R.B., Goel, P.S.: A fuzzy logic based approach to reliability improvement estimation during product development. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 80(1), 63–74 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biondini, F., Bontempi, F., Malerba, P.G.: Fuzzy reliability analysis of concrete structures. Comput. Struct. 82(13), 1033–1052 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aliev, I.M., Kara, Z.: Fuzzy system reliability analysis using time dependent fuzzy set. Control Cybernet. 33(4), 653–662 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luo, R.C., Chen, T.M., Su, K.L.: Target tracking using a hierarchical grey-fuzzy motion decision-making method. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part A: Syst. Humans 31(3), 179–186 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chandna, R., Ansari, S.R.: Comparison of fuzzy and multi-criteria decision making approach to measure manufacturing flexibility. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 3(5), 1–9 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boucher, T.O., Gogus, O.: Reliability, validity, and imprecision in fuzzy multi criteria decision-making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part C: Appl. Rev. 32(3), 190–202 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Valahzaghard, M.K., Mozaffari, M.M., Valehzagharad, H.K., Memarzade, M.: Supplier Selection by using Fuzzy Delphi, Fuzzy AHP and SIR.VIKOR. Am. J. Sci. Res. 35, 24–45 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pan, N.F.: Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method. Autom. Constr 17(8), 958–965 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, S., Li, S., Zhou, J., Li, Q., Kang, L.: Reliability allocation for CNC machine based on improved fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. AISS: Adv. Inf. Sci. Serv. Sci. 4(1), 320–327 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chatterjee, S., Singh, J.B., Roy, A.: A structure-based software reliability allocation using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 46(3), 513–525 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yao, J.S., Su, J.S., Shih, T.S.: Fuzzy system reliability analysis using triangular fuzzy numbers based on statistical data. J. Inf. Sci. Eng. 24(5), 1521–1535 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, H.M., Fuh, C.F., Su, J.S.: Fuzzy parallel system reliability analysis based on level (λ, ρ) interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control 8(8), 5703–5713 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, S.M.: Analyzing fuzzy system reliability using vague set theory. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 1(1), 82–88 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gouriveau, R., Dragomir, O., Zerhouni, N: A fuzzy approach of online reliability modeling and estimation. In 34th European Safety Reliability and Data Association, ESReDA Seminar and 2nd Joint ESReDA/ESRA Seminar on Supporting Technologies for Advanced Maintenance Information Management, pp. 1–12 (2008).

  19. Dehghanian, P., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., Bagheri-Shouraki, S., Razi-Kazemi, A.A.: Critical component identification in reliability centered asset management of power distribution systems via fuzzy AHP. IEEE Syst. J. 6(4), 593–602 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Enea, M., Piazza, T.: Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 3(1), 39–62 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahendran, P., Moorthy, M.B.K., Saravanan, S.: A fuzzy AHP approach for selection of measuring instrument for engineering college selection. Appl. Math. Sci. 8(44), 2149–2161 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chung, C.C., Chiang, C.H.: The critical factors: an evaluation of schedule reliability in liner shipping. Int. J. Oper. Res. 8(4), 3–9 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guan, J., Wu, Y.: Repairable consecutive-k-out-of-n: F system with fuzzy states. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 157(1), 121–142 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ebrahimipur, V., Qurayshi, S.F., Shabani, A., Maleki-Shoja, B.: Reliability optimization of multi-state weighted k-out-of-n systems by fuzzy mathematical programming and genetic algorithm. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2(4), 312–318 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ram, M., Kumar, A.: Performance of a structure consisting a 2-out-of-3:F substructure under human failure. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(11), 8383–8394 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Buckley, J.J.: Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Set Syst. 17, 233–247 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chou, S.W., Chang, Y.C.: The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits. Decis. Support. Syst. 46(1), 149–157 (2008)

  28. Dhillon, B.S., Yang, N.: Stochastic analysis of standby systems with common-cause failures and human errors. Microelectron. Reliab. 32(12), 1699–1712 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trivedi, K.S.: Probability and statistics with reliability. Queueing and Computer Science Applications. Wiley, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ram, M., Singh, S.B.: Availability and cost analysis of a parallel redundant complex system with two types of failure under preemptive-resume repair discipline using Gumbel-Hougaard family copula in repair. Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng. 15(04), 341–365 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ram, M., Singh, S.B.: Analysis of a complex system with common cause failure and two types of repair facilities with different distributions in failure. Int. J. Reliab. Saf. 4(4), 381–392 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ram, M., Singh, S.B.: Availability, MTTF and cost analysis of complex system under preemptive-repeat repair discipline using Gumbel-Hougaard family copula. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 27(5), 576–595 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Verma, A.K., Ajit, S., Karanki, D.R.: Reliability and safety engineering, 1st edn. Springer Publishers, London (2010). 978-1-84996-231-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Ram, M.: On system reliability approaches: a brief survey. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 4(2), 101–117 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ram, M., Manglik, M.: Stochastic behaviour analysis of a Markov model under multi-state failures. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 5(4), 686–699 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ram, M., Kumar, A.: Paper mill plant performance evaluation with power supply in standby mode. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 32(4), 400–414 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ram, M., Kumar, A.: Performability analysis of a system under 1-out-of-2: G scheme with perfect reworking. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 37(3), 1029–1038 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar, A., Varshney, A., Ram, M.: Sensitivity analysis for casting process under stochastic modelling. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput 6(3), 419–432 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Guesgen, H.W., Albrecht, J.: Imprecise reasoning in geographic information systems. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 113(1), 121–131 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mangey Ram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandna, R., Ram, M. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to a structure under 2-out-of-3:F modeling. OPSEARCH 53, 693–704 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-016-0255-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-016-0255-8

Keywords

Navigation