Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-period additive efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis with non-positive and undesirable data

  • Theoretical Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models make an assumption of non-negativity in the inputs and outputs data of the decision making units (DMUs) under analysis. In this paper, we present a non-radial measure of efficiency of DMUs by establishing a multi-period additive DEA model taking into consideration both desirable and undesirable inputs and outputs with positive and non-positive values. The proposed efficiency model possesses the requisite features of translation invariance and unit independence, obligatory when dealing with negative values in the data set. Furthermore, this paper contributes with the proposal of a multi-period additive super-efficiency DEA model to discriminate the performance of efficient decision making units. Finally, we present an efficiency evaluation 37 countries worldwide on economic parameters to demonstrate the applicability and efficacy of the proposed models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The complete data file is provided by Prof. Josef Jablonsky.

References

  1. Ali, A.I., Seiford, L.M.: Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Oper. Res. Lett. 10, 403–405 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen, P., Petersen, N.C.: A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 39(10), 1261–1264 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 30, 1078–1092 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Briec, W., Kerstens, K.: Multi-horizon Markowitz portfolio performance appraisals: a general approach. Omega 37, 50–62 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429–444 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., Stutz, J.: Foundations of data envepoment analysis for Pareto–Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J. Econ. 30, 91–107 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Y.: Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 161, 545–551 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Du, J., Liang, L., Zhu, J.: A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: a comment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 204, 694–697 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Emrouznejad, A., Yang, G.L.: A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 61, 4–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Esmaeilzadeh, A., Hadi-Vencheh, A.: A super-efficiency model for measuring aggregative efficiency of multi-period production systems. Measurement 46(10), 3988–3993 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S.: Modelling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 157, 242–245 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo, I.L., Lee, H.S., Lee, D.: An integrated model for slack-based measure of super-efficiency in additive DEA. Omega 67, 160–167 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, T.H., Pan, S.C., Wu, P.C.: Country performance evaluation: the DEA model approach. Soc. Indic. Res. 118, 835–849 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jablonsky, J.: Efficiency analysis in multi-period systems: an application to performance evaluation in Czech higher education. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24, 283–296 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koopmans, T.C.: Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans, T.C. (ed.) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, pp. 33–97. Wiley, Cowles Commission, New York (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Korhonen, P.J., Luptacik, M.: Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: an extension of data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154(2), 437–446 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin, R., Chen, Z., Hu, Q., Li, Z.: Multi-period fund performance evaluation: a dynamic network DEA approach with diversification and the directional distance function. OR Spectr. 39, 821–860 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, W.B., Meng, W., Li, X.X., Zhang, D.Q.: DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Ann. Oper. Res. 173, 117–194 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, W.B., Meng, W., Sharp, J.: A modified slacks based measure model for data envelopment analysis with natural negative outputs and inputs. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58, 1672–1677 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, W., Zhou, Z., Ma, C.X., Liu, D., Shen, W.: Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Omega 56, 74–87 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lovell, C.A.K., Pastor, J.T., Turner, J.A.: Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: a comparison of European and non-European countries. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 87, 507–518 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahdiloo, M., Noorizadeh, A., Saen, R.F., Tavana, M.: A game theoretic approach to modeling undesirable outputs and efficiency decomposition in data envelopment analysis. Appl. Math. Comput. 244, 479–492 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pastor, J.T.: Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: a generalization. Ann. Oper. Res. 66, 93–102 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pastor, J.T., Aparicio, J.: Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 221, 245–268 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Portela, S., Simpson, G., Thanassoulis, E.: Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55, 1111–1121 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J.: Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 37, 174–187 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J.: Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 142(1), 16–20 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Skevas, T., Lansink, A.O., Stefanou, S.E.: Measuring technical efficiency in the presence of pesticide spillovers and production uncertainty: the case of Dutch arable farm. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(2), 550–559 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tone, K.: A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130, 498–509 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wei, W., Xia, H.-S.: Undesirable output based evaluation of airports productivity. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 34(1), 138–146 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wojcik, V., Dyckhoff, H., Gutgesell, S.: The desirable input of undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 259(1–2), 461–484 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou, Z., Liu, W.: DEA models with undesirable inputs, intermediates, and outputs. In: Zhu, J. (ed.) Data Envelopment Analysis: A Handbook of Models and Methods, pp. 415–446. Springer, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu, J.: Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets. Kluwer, Boston (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is thankful to CSIR (1061440740), India, for financial grant to pursue this research. The authors are thankful to Prof. Josef Jablonsky, Czech Republic, for providing the complete 4 year data used in Sect. 4. The authors are thankful to the esteemed referees for their valuable inputs and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pooja Bansal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bansal, P., Mehra, A. Multi-period additive efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis with non-positive and undesirable data. OPSEARCH 55, 642–661 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-018-0343-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-018-0343-z

Keywords

Navigation