Skip to main content
Log in

Insurance for Improving User Satisfaction Level

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Service-level agreement (SLA) violations may lead to losses and user dissatisfaction. Despite the fact that a service guarantee can increase the satisfaction level of users, indemnities may not be commensurate with the importance of a service to a user. While predefined penalties may be insufficient to compensate for the losses of one user, another user may not suffer loss from the SLA violation. With an insurance plan, an insurer can reach an agreement with users on the premium and loss coverage volume; insurance can therefore be considered a solution for providing indemnity which is appropriate to the importance of service. An insurer cannot protect users against these losses, which are caused by a single root event, in the same way as it protects them against the losses caused by independent events. In this paper, a novel approach is proposed for providing insurance coverage for such root events by limiting insurance provisions to the users with the highest priority. A criterion is presented for priority assignment to users, and an algorithm is then proposed for providing insurance according to this priority. A game-theoretic analysis is also provided to assess acceptability of the outcome of the proposed algorithm to rational users and insurers. The results of numerical experiments demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach for improving the utility of the service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aceto G, Botta A, de Donato W, Pescapè A (2013) Cloud monitoring: a survey. Comput Netw 57:2093–2115. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2013.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allon G, Federgruen A (2009) Competition in service industries with segmented markets. Manag Sci 55:619–634. doi:10.2139/ssrn.907322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atif Y (2002) Building trust in e-commerce. IEEE Internet Comput 6:18–24. doi:10.1109/4236.978365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barto, Anandan P (1985) Pattern-recognizing stochastic learning automata. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 15:360–375. doi:10.1109/tsmc.1985.6313371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baset S (2012) Cloud SLAs: present and future. ACM SIGOPS Oper Syst Rev 46:57. doi:10.1145/2331576.2331586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi S, Thaler R (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Q J Econ 110:73–92. doi:10.2307/2118511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A, Choudhury S (2015) Service insurance: a new approach in cloud brokerage. In: Chaki R, Saeed K, Choudhury S, Chaki N (eds) Applied computation and security systems. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 305. Springer, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen J, Chen S (2001) The relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. Int J Contemp Hospitality Manag 13:213–217. doi:10.1108/09596110110395893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catteddu D (2010) Cloud computing: benefits, risks and recommendations for information security. Web Appl Secur. Springer, Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dong W, Shah H, Wong F (1996) A rational approach to pricing of catastrophe insurance. J Risk Uncertain 12:201–218. doi:10.1007/bf00055794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM (1988) Decision making under ambiguity: a note. In: Munier BR (ed) Risk, decision and rationality. Theory and decision library (Series B: Mathematical and Statistical Methods), vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Emeakaroha V, Netto M, Calheiros R et al (2012) Towards autonomic detection of SLA violations in cloud infrastructures. Future Gener Comput Syst 28:1017–1029. doi:10.1016/j.future.2011.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg S, Toosi A, Gopalaiyengar S, Buyya R (2014) SLA-based virtual machine management for heterogeneous workloads in a cloud datacenter. J Netw Comput Appl 45:108–120. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2014.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos C (2007) Service management and marketing: customer management in service competition. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Hani A, Paputungan I, Hassan M (2015) Renegotiation in service level agreement management for a cloud-based system. CSUR 47:1–21. doi:10.1145/2716319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth R, Kunreuther H (1992) Pricing insurance and warranties: ambiguity and correlated risks. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Theory 17:35–60. doi:10.1007/bf00941956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javadi B, Abawajy J, Buyya R (2012) Failure-aware resource provisioning for hybrid cloud infrastructure. J Parallel Distrib Comput 72:1318–1331. doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2012.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linlin W, Buyya R (2012) Service level agreement (SLA) in utility computing systems. In: Performance and dependability in service computing: concepts, techniques and research directions. IGI Global, USA

  • Luo M, Zhang L, Lei F (2010) An insurance model for guaranteeing service assurance, integrity and QOS in cloud computing. In: IEEE international conference on web services (ICWS). IEEE, Florida, USA, pp 584–591

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall G, Levesque T (2000) Customer satisfaction with services: putting perceived value into the equation. J Serv Mark 14:392–410. doi:10.1108/08876040010340937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naldi M (2014) Balancing leasing and insurance costs to achieve total risk coverage in cloud storage multi-homing. In: Altmann J, Vanmechelen K, Rana O (eds) Economics of grids, clouds, systems, and services. GECON 2014. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8914. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendra K, Thathachar M (2012) Learning automata: an introduction. Courier Corporation, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisan N, Schapira M, Valiant G, Zohar A (2011) Best-response mechanisms. In: The second symposium on innovations in computer science (ICS), Beijing, China, pp 155–165

  • Oommen B, Hashem M (2010) Modeling a student’s behavior in a tutorial-like system using learning automata. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 40:481–492. doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2009.2027220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano D, Bouchenak S, Kouki Y et al (2013) Towards QOS-oriented SLA guarantees for online cloud services. In: 13th IEEE/ACM international symposium on cluster, cloud and grid computing (CCGrid). IEEE, Delft, Netherlands, pp 50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao J, Wei H, Wang Q, Mei H (2010) A runtime model based monitoring approach for cloud. In: IEEE 3rd international conference on cloud computing. IEEE, Florida, USA, pp 313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1982) Models of bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Siyal M, Barkat B (2002) A novel trust service provider for internet based commerce applications. Internet Res 12:55–65. doi:10.1108/10662240210415826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sureshchandar G, Rajendran C, Anantharaman R (2002) The relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction—a factor specific approach. J Serv Mark 16:363–379. doi:10.1108/08876040210433248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Kumar Garg S, Buyya R (2012) SLA-based admission control for a software-as-a-service provider in cloud computing environments. J Comput Syst Sci 78:1280–1299. doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2011.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong L, Liu L (2002) Building trust in decentralized peer-to-peer electronic communities. In: Fifth international conference on electronic commerce research (ICECR-5), Montreal, Canada

  • Zweifel P, Eisen R (2012) Insurance economics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Morshedlou.

Additional information

Accepted after three revisions by Prof. Dr. Schoder.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 171 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morshedlou, H., Meybodi, M.R. Insurance for Improving User Satisfaction Level. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60, 513–524 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0492-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0492-2

Keywords

Navigation