Abstract
Service-level agreement (SLA) violations may lead to losses and user dissatisfaction. Despite the fact that a service guarantee can increase the satisfaction level of users, indemnities may not be commensurate with the importance of a service to a user. While predefined penalties may be insufficient to compensate for the losses of one user, another user may not suffer loss from the SLA violation. With an insurance plan, an insurer can reach an agreement with users on the premium and loss coverage volume; insurance can therefore be considered a solution for providing indemnity which is appropriate to the importance of service. An insurer cannot protect users against these losses, which are caused by a single root event, in the same way as it protects them against the losses caused by independent events. In this paper, a novel approach is proposed for providing insurance coverage for such root events by limiting insurance provisions to the users with the highest priority. A criterion is presented for priority assignment to users, and an algorithm is then proposed for providing insurance according to this priority. A game-theoretic analysis is also provided to assess acceptability of the outcome of the proposed algorithm to rational users and insurers. The results of numerical experiments demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach for improving the utility of the service.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aceto G, Botta A, de Donato W, Pescapè A (2013) Cloud monitoring: a survey. Comput Netw 57:2093–2115. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2013.04.001
Allon G, Federgruen A (2009) Competition in service industries with segmented markets. Manag Sci 55:619–634. doi:10.2139/ssrn.907322
Atif Y (2002) Building trust in e-commerce. IEEE Internet Comput 6:18–24. doi:10.1109/4236.978365
Barto, Anandan P (1985) Pattern-recognizing stochastic learning automata. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 15:360–375. doi:10.1109/tsmc.1985.6313371
Baset S (2012) Cloud SLAs: present and future. ACM SIGOPS Oper Syst Rev 46:57. doi:10.1145/2331576.2331586
Benartzi S, Thaler R (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Q J Econ 110:73–92. doi:10.2307/2118511
Bhattacharya A, Choudhury S (2015) Service insurance: a new approach in cloud brokerage. In: Chaki R, Saeed K, Choudhury S, Chaki N (eds) Applied computation and security systems. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 305. Springer, New Delhi
Bowen J, Chen S (2001) The relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. Int J Contemp Hospitality Manag 13:213–217. doi:10.1108/09596110110395893
Catteddu D (2010) Cloud computing: benefits, risks and recommendations for information security. Web Appl Secur. Springer, Heidelberg
Dong W, Shah H, Wong F (1996) A rational approach to pricing of catastrophe insurance. J Risk Uncertain 12:201–218. doi:10.1007/bf00055794
Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM (1988) Decision making under ambiguity: a note. In: Munier BR (ed) Risk, decision and rationality. Theory and decision library (Series B: Mathematical and Statistical Methods), vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht
Emeakaroha V, Netto M, Calheiros R et al (2012) Towards autonomic detection of SLA violations in cloud infrastructures. Future Gener Comput Syst 28:1017–1029. doi:10.1016/j.future.2011.08.018
Garg S, Toosi A, Gopalaiyengar S, Buyya R (2014) SLA-based virtual machine management for heterogeneous workloads in a cloud datacenter. J Netw Comput Appl 45:108–120. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2014.07.030
Grönroos C (2007) Service management and marketing: customer management in service competition. Wiley, Hoboken
Hani A, Paputungan I, Hassan M (2015) Renegotiation in service level agreement management for a cloud-based system. CSUR 47:1–21. doi:10.1145/2716319
Hogarth R, Kunreuther H (1992) Pricing insurance and warranties: ambiguity and correlated risks. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Theory 17:35–60. doi:10.1007/bf00941956
Javadi B, Abawajy J, Buyya R (2012) Failure-aware resource provisioning for hybrid cloud infrastructure. J Parallel Distrib Comput 72:1318–1331. doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2012.06.012
Linlin W, Buyya R (2012) Service level agreement (SLA) in utility computing systems. In: Performance and dependability in service computing: concepts, techniques and research directions. IGI Global, USA
Luo M, Zhang L, Lei F (2010) An insurance model for guaranteeing service assurance, integrity and QOS in cloud computing. In: IEEE international conference on web services (ICWS). IEEE, Florida, USA, pp 584–591
McDougall G, Levesque T (2000) Customer satisfaction with services: putting perceived value into the equation. J Serv Mark 14:392–410. doi:10.1108/08876040010340937
Naldi M (2014) Balancing leasing and insurance costs to achieve total risk coverage in cloud storage multi-homing. In: Altmann J, Vanmechelen K, Rana O (eds) Economics of grids, clouds, systems, and services. GECON 2014. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8914. Springer, Cham
Narendra K, Thathachar M (2012) Learning automata: an introduction. Courier Corporation, USA
Nisan N, Schapira M, Valiant G, Zohar A (2011) Best-response mechanisms. In: The second symposium on innovations in computer science (ICS), Beijing, China, pp 155–165
Oommen B, Hashem M (2010) Modeling a student’s behavior in a tutorial-like system using learning automata. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 40:481–492. doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2009.2027220
Serrano D, Bouchenak S, Kouki Y et al (2013) Towards QOS-oriented SLA guarantees for online cloud services. In: 13th IEEE/ACM international symposium on cluster, cloud and grid computing (CCGrid). IEEE, Delft, Netherlands, pp 50–57
Shao J, Wei H, Wang Q, Mei H (2010) A runtime model based monitoring approach for cloud. In: IEEE 3rd international conference on cloud computing. IEEE, Florida, USA, pp 313–320
Simon H (1982) Models of bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge
Siyal M, Barkat B (2002) A novel trust service provider for internet based commerce applications. Internet Res 12:55–65. doi:10.1108/10662240210415826
Sureshchandar G, Rajendran C, Anantharaman R (2002) The relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction—a factor specific approach. J Serv Mark 16:363–379. doi:10.1108/08876040210433248
Wu L, Kumar Garg S, Buyya R (2012) SLA-based admission control for a software-as-a-service provider in cloud computing environments. J Comput Syst Sci 78:1280–1299. doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2011.12.014
Xiong L, Liu L (2002) Building trust in decentralized peer-to-peer electronic communities. In: Fifth international conference on electronic commerce research (ICECR-5), Montreal, Canada
Zweifel P, Eisen R (2012) Insurance economics. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted after three revisions by Prof. Dr. Schoder.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morshedlou, H., Meybodi, M.R. Insurance for Improving User Satisfaction Level. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60, 513–524 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0492-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0492-2