Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Style, Metacognition and Creativity as Predictors of the Foreign Language Achievement: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

  • Research in Progress
  • Published:
Psychological Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This current study sought to examine the role of creativity, metacognition and VAK learning style in foreign language achievement. To collect the data, a sample of 122 Iranian English as Foreign Language learners participated in this research. Participants completed Creativity Instrument by Abedi (Creat Res J 14(2):267–276, 2002), Metacognitive Awareness Inventory by Schraw and Dennison (Contemp Educ Psychol 19:460–475, 1994), and visual, aural, and kinesthetic (VAK) learning style initially designed by Chislett and Chapman (VAK Learning Styles Self-Assessment Questionnaire, 2005. http://www.businessballs.com) and modified and validated by the present study researchers using confirmatory factor analysis. Learners’ scores at the end of the term were aggregated as the measure of foreign language achievement. Its reliability was also checked and approved applying Cronbach’s α. According to the findings, all three independent variables positively and significantly predict students’ language achievement, creativity (14.63%); metacognition (29.78%); and VAK learning style (7.20%). Although each of them had a unique impact on foreign language achievement, metacognition outweighs creativity and VAK learning style as the predictor of foreign language achievement. Furthermore, there is a significant difference between genders on all the variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedi, J. (2002). A latent-variable modeling approach to assessing reliability and validity of a creativity instrument. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ai, X. (1999). Creativity and academic achievement: An investigation of gender differences. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S. (2004). A comparison of the relationship between creativity, learning style preference and achievement at GCSE and degree level in the context of design and technology project work. Paper presented at the DATA International Research Conference on Creativity and Innovation, Sunderland University, England.

  • Bratko, D., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Saks, Z. (2006). Personality and school performance: Incremental validity of self- and peer-ratings over intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1057–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzik, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality traits and academic examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chislett, V., & Chapman, A. (2005). VAK learning styles self-assessment questionnaire. Retrieved from http://www.businessballs.com.

  • Coutinho, S. A. (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. Educate, 7, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2001). Little c creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Liebling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 45–61). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dita, S. (2009). The metalinguistic awareness of Filipino bilingual children. Philippine ESL Journal, 3, 6–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003) Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrand, L. H. (1977). Social and individual frame factors in second language learning. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Ed.), Papers from the first Nordic conference on bilingualism (pp. 40–61). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everson, H. T., & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (2005). Teaching children to think (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of psychological inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortner, V. (1986). Generalization of creative productive-thinking training to LD students’ written expression. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genesee, F. (1976). The role of intelligence in second language learning. Language Learning, 26, 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghonsooly, B., & Shoqi, S. (2012). The effects of foreign language learning on creativity. English Language Teaching Journal, 5, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, J. W. (1982). Assessing student learning styles. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles and brain behaviour (pp. 1–18). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How differences in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Medwell, J., Wray, D., Wang, L., & Liu, X. (2016). Learning styles: A review of validity and usefulness. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4, 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lujan, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2005). First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meera, K. P., & Remya, P. (2010). Effect of extensive reading and creativity on achievement in English language. E-Journal of All India Association for Educational Research, 22, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naderi, H., Abdullah, R., Aizan, H. T., Sharir, J., & Kumar, V. (2009). Creativity, age and gender as predictors of academic achievement among undergraduate students. Journal of American Science, 5, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Othman, N., & Amiruddin, M. H. (2010). Different perspectives of learning styles from VARK model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 652–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottó, I. (1998). The relationship between individual differences in learner creativity and language learning success. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 763–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palaniappan, A. K. (2007). Academic achievement of groups formed based on creativity and intelligence. Paper presented at the 13th international conference on thinking, Norrköping.

  • Pishghadam, R., & Khajavy, G. H. H. (2013). Intelligence and metacognition as predictors of foreign language achievement: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishghadam, R., Khodadady, E., & Zabihi, R. (2011). Learner creativity in foreign language achievement. European Journal of Educational Studies, 3, 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raoofi, S., Chan, S. H., Mukundan, J., & Rashid, S. M. (2014). Metacognition and second/foreign language learning. English Language Teaching, 7, 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, C. (2004). A comparative study of creativity and cognitive problem-solving strategies of high-iq and average students. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A. & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y. H. (2009). Idea creation: The need to develop creativity in lifelong learning practices. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28, 705–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surjono, H. D. (2011). The design of adaptive E-learning system based on student’s learning styles. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 2, 2350–2353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutrisno, S. (2007). Students’ creativity and its relation to English learning achievement. Unpublished Thesis. Semarang State University, Brebes.

  • Tunmer, W. E., & Cole, P. (1985). Learning to read: A metalinguistic act. In C. S. Simon (Ed.), Communication skills and classroom success: Therapy methodologies for language learning disabled children (pp. 179–198). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaishnav, R. S., & Chirayu, K. C. (2013). Learning style and academic achievement of secondary school students. Voice of Research, 1, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2001). The assessment of metacognitive skillfulness. In F. Oser, & U. Baets (Eds.), 9th European conference on learning and instruction, abstract volume (pp. 278). Mainz, Aachen.

  • Zafar, Sh, & Meenakshi, K. (2012). Individual learner differences and second language acquisition: A review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3, 639–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapalska, A., & Brozik, D. (2006). Learning style and online education. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 23, 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. English Department, Torbat-e Heydarieh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e Heydarieh, Iran

    Hossein Khodabakhshzadeh, Mansooreh Hosseinnia & Shaghayegh Rahimian

Authors
  1. Hossein Khodabakhshzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mansooreh Hosseinnia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaghayegh Rahimian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Khodabakhshzadeh.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khodabakhshzadeh, H., Hosseinnia, M. & Rahimian, S. Learning Style, Metacognition and Creativity as Predictors of the Foreign Language Achievement: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Psychol Stud 62, 377–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-017-0427-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-017-0427-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation