Abstract
The aim of the current quantitative research was to design and validate a scale assessing the English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers’ motivation and employing the scale to investigate the association between teachers’ motivation, job commitment, and work engagement. In order to design the scale, the collected data from a triangulated qualitative study by Pourtoussi et al. (Int J Instruct 11(4):175–190, 2018) were employed. The researchers designed the questionnaire based on five factors (teacher-related, administrative, student-related, non-human-related, and immediate environment) rated on a five-point Likert scale. The proposed model was tested via confirmatory factor analysis using the LISREL 8.50 statistical package. Afterwards, we probed the interrelationship between motivation, work engagement, and job commitment via structural equation modeling. The results demonstrated that EFL teachers’ motivation positively and significantly predicted work engagement and job commitment. Work engagement positively influenced job commitment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Cardelle-Elawar, M., de Acedo, Sanz., & Lizarraga, M. L. (2010). Looking at teacher identity through self-regulation. Psicothema, 22(2), 293–298.
Conklin, A. M., Dahling, J. J., & Garcia, P. A. (2013). Linking affective commitment, career self-efficacy, and outcome expectations: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Career Development, 40(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845311423534.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.135.
Fernet, C., Trépanier, S. G., Austin, S., & Levesque-Côté, J. (2016). Committed, inspiring, and healthy teachers: How do school environment and motivational factors facilitate optimal functioning at career start? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.019.
Ghanizadeh, A., & Ghonsooly, B. (2014). A tripartite model of EFL teachers’ attributions, burnout, and self-regulation: towards the prospects of effective teaching. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 13(2), 145–166.
Ghanizadeh, A., Al-Hoorie, A.H., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2020). Higher order thinking skills in the language classroom: A concise guide. Switzerland: Springer.
Kumazawa, M. (2013). Gaps too large: Four novice EFL teachers’ self-concept and motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.005.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z.
Mowday, R. T. R., Steers, R. R. M., & Porter, L. W. L. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vacational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.
Park, I. (2005). Teacher commitment and its effects on student achievement in American high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(5), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500146269.
Pourtoussi, Z., Ghanizadeh, A., & Mousavi, V. (2018). A qualitative in-depth analysis of the determinants and outcomes of EFL teachers’ motivation and demotivation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 175–190.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.
Royaei, N., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2016). The interface between motivational and emotional facets of organizational commitment among instructors at higher education. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 228–252. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2016.2139.
Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). What is engagement. Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, 15, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.12.
Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2004). Uwes utrecht work engagement scale preliminary manual. http://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/TestManuals/Test_manual_UWES_English.pdf.
Schiefele, U. (2017). Classroom management and mastery-oriented instruction as mediators of the effects of teacher motivation on student motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.004.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001.
Thomson, M. M., Turner, J. E., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2012). A typological approach to investigate the teaching career decision: Motivations and beliefs about teaching of prospective teacher candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zahra Pourtoussi collected the required data and wrote the first draft. Afsaneh Ghanizadeh supervised the study, conducted the statistical analysis, and revised the earlier draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent to Participate
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, although no institutional arrangements for the governance of ethics exist in the country in which the research was done.
Ethics Approval
Endeavor was made to observe the ethical issues required for a research study involving humans, including, privacy, anonymity, and confidentiality considerations. Nonetheless, no formal consent was applied.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: EFL teachers’ motivation scale (refined version)
Appendix: EFL teachers’ motivation scale (refined version)
Dear Participant,
I greatly appreciate your valuable time and efforts that you will spend in filling out this questionnaire. The researcher promises that all the information you share in this survey is going to be confidential and only used in the scientific purposes of the research.
Thank you.
Please indicate your answers to each item by choosing the appropriate rate on the five-point scale below. Your answers will be kept confidential. (1 = strongly agree, 2 = Agree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Disagree, 5 = strongly disagree).
No | Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | I have enough access to audiovisual materials (CDs, smart boards, etc.) in my classroom | |||||
2 | The supplementary materials (any book, photocopies, pictures, flashcards, etc.) are easily available | |||||
3 | The class has appropriate physical features which I can manipulate and change according to the class needs such as the design of chairs, light, temperature, etc. | |||||
4 | The relevant facilities (library, gym, movie lab, etc.) are available in order to teach according to the relevance of the lessons | |||||
5 | The cultural differences of my students are low and I can minimize them as much as possible | |||||
6 | Students are well motivated in the context of classroom while I am teaching | |||||
7 | Students’ behavior is appropriate and decent in the classroom | |||||
8 | Students respect each other as well as their teacher in the classroom | |||||
9 | Students have enough cooperation and scaffolding among each other | |||||
10 | I believe that I belong to the right profession | |||||
11 | My colleagues frankly discuss their negative and positive experiences after instruction | |||||
12 | Other teachers judge each other in the right way to construct effective learning and teaching environment | |||||
13 | Teachers work together and they try to build positive environment | |||||
14 | The supervisor has realistic expectations | |||||
15 | The load of observation sessions by the supervisor does not exceed my expectation | |||||
16 | I have a free hand in my classroom activities, teaching materials, and methodology | |||||
17 | The supervisor has a friendly and supportive behavior | |||||
18 | I receive appropriate payment which is in line with what I do | |||||
19 | I receive bonus for any outstanding performance | |||||
20 | I teach the classes with students with homogenous proficiency level | |||||
21 | The textbook is appropriate in terms of tasks, pictures, etc. | |||||
22 | Parents have high and unrealistic expectations from me | |||||
23 | The administrator expects more than my capacity | |||||
24 | The disruptive or defiant students can ruin the entire lesson | |||||
25 | I teach in a class with heterogeneous students in terms of their proficiency level | |||||
26 | The textbook does not match students’ needs and expectation | |||||
27 | The classroom does not have appropriate setting (e.g., the position of chairs is fixed, so I cannot make any changes in the class). | |||||
28 | Students are in competition with each other rather than in cooperation | |||||
29 | I cannot effectively respond to defiant students | |||||
30 | I am not paid enough and the amount of payment does not match my expectation | |||||
31 | The institute does not provide up to date audiovisual equipment for playing CDs and videos | |||||
32 | I can adjust my lessons to the proper level for individual students | |||||
33 | The administrator forces me to follow the strict rules in my classes in which there must be no deviation | |||||
34 | While preparing classes, I do not set pre-specified goals for myself | |||||
35 | I feel exhilarated after working closely with my students | |||||
36 | I feel students blame me for their learning difficulties | |||||
37 | Working with students all the day is a strain for me | |||||
38 | I like my profession because I can better prepare my students for life | |||||
39 | It is important to be a successful teacher to please school principal or institute supervisor | |||||
40 | It is important to be a successful teacher to satisfy myself professionally | |||||
41 | I am proud of working as a teacher | |||||
42 | I can control disruptive behavior in my class |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pourtousi, Z., Ghanizadeh, A. Teachers’ Motivation and Its Association with Job Commitment and Work Engagement. Psychol Stud 65, 455–466 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-020-00571-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-020-00571-x