Abstract
This research examined the relationships of social network sites (SNS) intensity, parasocial interaction (PSI), and the propensity to imitate idols or celebrities. Conceptual model that depicts the indirect effect of the measured PSI on the relationship of SNS usage and the tendency to imitate idols was tested. 194 undergraduate students were recruited to complete the Celebrity-Persona Parasocial Interaction Scales, the modified Facebook Intensity Scale, and a set of five items that reflect on the inclination to imitate idols. Results revealed the significant indirect effect of the measured PSI, supporting that SNS intensity facilitate parasocial experience, which in turn, induce the tendency to impersonate idols. Findings supported one of the theorems of the uncertainty reduction theory, which posited the facilitative effect of perceived intimacy on similarity. Theorem that posited the importance of engagement level in inducing similarity was negated by the obtained results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Abroms, L. C., & Craig Lefebvre, R. (2009). Obama’s wired campaign: Lessons for public health communication. Journal of Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730903033000
Adams-Price, C., & Greene, A. L. (1990). Secondary attachments and adolescent self-concept. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288191
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., & Pantic, I. (2015). Internet use, Facebook intrusion, and depression: Results of a cross-sectional study. European Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.04.002
Bocarnea, M. C., & Brown, W. J. (2007). Celebrity-persona identification scale. In R. A. Reynolds, R. Woods, & J. D. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 302–305). Idea Group Reference.
Boon, S. D., & Lomore, C. D. (2001). Admirer–celebrity relationships among young adults: Explaining perceptions of celebrity influence on identity. Human Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00788.x
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Burnett, A., & Beto, R. R. (2000). Reading romance novels: An application of parasocial relationship theory. North Dakota Journal of Speech & Theatre, 13, 28–39.
Cho, M., Schweickart, T., & Haase, A. (2014). Public engagement with nonprofit organizations on Facebook. Public Relations Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.01.008
Cohen, E. L., & Tyler, W. J. (2016). Examining perceived distance and personal authenticity as mediators of the effects of ghost-tweeting on parasocial interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0657
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
Cohen, J. (2006). Audience identification with media characters. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 183–197). Erlbaum.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Frederick, E. L., Lim, C. H., Clavio, G., & Walsh, P. (2012). Why we follow: An examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.5.4.481
Frost, R. L., & Rickwood, D. J. (2017). A systematic review of the mental health outcomes associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.001
Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Tolan, G. A., & Marrington, J. (2013). Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online? Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Kassing, J. W., & Sanderson, J. (2010). Fan-athlete interaction and Twitter tweeting through the Giro: A case study. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 113–128.
Kim, H., Ko, E., & Kim, J. (2015). SNS users’ para-social relationships with celebrities: Social media effects on purchase intentions. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2015.1043690
Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291–313). Erlbaum.
Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer-brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003
Ledbetter, A. M., & Redd, S. M. (2016). Celebrity credibility on social media: A conditional process analysis of online self-disclosure attitude as a moderator of posting frequency and parasocial interaction. Western Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1187286
Levy, M. (1979). Watching television news as parasocial interaction. Journal of Broadcasting. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838157909363919
Liebers, N., & Schramm, H. (2019). Parasocial interactions and relationships with media characters—An inventory of 60 years of research. Communication Research Trends, 38(2), 4–31.
Marshall, P. D. (2010). The promotion and presentation of the self: Celebrity as marker of presentational media. Celebrity Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392390903519057
Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539
Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). Posting, commenting, and tagging: Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.024
Park, J. H., & Lennon, S. J. (2004). Television apparel shopping: Impulse buying and parasocial interaction. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0402200304
Pennington, N., Hall, J. A., & Hutchinson, A. (2016). To tweet or not to tweet: Explaining fan-celebrity interactionon Twitter. Iowa Journal of Communication, 48(1/2), 55–75.
Perse, E. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016001003
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
Rasmussen, L. (2018). Parasocial interaction in the digital age: An examination of relationship building and the effectiveness of YouTube celebrities. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 280–294.
Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
Stever, G. S., & Lawson, K. (2013). Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: Implications for the study of parasocial interaction. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 339–354.
Thorson, K. S., & Rodgers, S. (2006). Relationships between blogs as eWOM and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Advertising. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2006.10722117
Tian, Q., & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903296051
Tsai, W. H. S., & Men, L. R. (2017a). Social CEOs: The effects of CEOs’ communication styles and parasocial interaction on social networking sites. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816643922
Tsai, W. H. S., & Men, L. R. (2017b). Consumer engagement with brands on social network sites: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the USA. Journal of Marketing Communications. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2014.942678
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Ethical Approval
Ethics approval was granted by Taylor’s University Human Ethics Committee; HEC 2019/025.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable. This research sought for implied consent.
Consent for Publication
Both authors are aware of this submission.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ke Yen, K., Soon Li, L. Social Network Sites Usage and Idol Emulation: Indirect Effect of Parasocial Interaction. Psychol Stud 66, 463–470 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-021-00630-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-021-00630-x