Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An integrated partial least square and rough set approach for studying pilgrimage attitude towards cultural heritage of Odisha

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth of information and communication technology makes people neglect their cultural heritage due to various factors, and it leads to a lack of cultural heritage transformation from one generation to the next generation. It greatly impacts on pilgrimage attitude towards cultural heritage. Besides, the expansion of heritage places improves the economic worth of any nation. Further, pilgrimage attraction is a major concern, which in turn improves the business opportunities. In general, cultural heritage depends on the historical, aesthetic, and architectural value of a particular place. Apart from these factors, some other parameters are also associated with cultural heritage. Therefore, it is significant to understand the behavioral pattern of the pilgrimage and their likeliness. This paper makes a phenomenological approach to uncover subliminal values associated with the cultural heritage places of Odisha, India. The prime objective is to study the attitude of pilgrimage towards visiting cultural heritage places. The attitude of pilgrimage depends on different dimensions, such as historical, aesthetic, architectural, spiritual, environment, economic, and management. Looking into uncertainty and frequent changes in human behavior, we employ variance-based structural equation modeling using partial least square and rough set for analyzing the information system. Variance-based structural equation modeling using partial least square help us to identify the factors that are essential for the study, and then the rough set is used to generate the rules. It, in turn, study the attitude of pilgrimage towards cultural heritage place of Odisha.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://goo.gl/forms/E2H6YRq0ASPc7LXt2.

References

  • Acharjya DP (2014) Rough set on two universal sets and knowledge representation. In: Issac B, Israr N (eds) Case studies in intelligent computing: achievements and trends. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 79–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharjya DP, Das TK (2017) A framework for attribute selection in marketing using rough computing and formal concept analysis. IIMB Manag Rev 29(2):122–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharjya DP, Tripathy BK (2008) Rough sets on fuzzy approximation spaces and applications to distributed knowledge systems. Int J Artif Intell Soft Comput 1(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad Y (2006) The scope and definitions of heritage: from tangible to intangible. Int J Herit Stud 12(3):292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed NSS, Acharjya DP, Sanyal S (2017) A framework for phishing attack identification using rough set and formal concept analysis. Int J Commun Netw Distrib Syst 18(2):186–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anitha A, Acharjya DP (2015) Neural network and rough set hybrid scheme for prediction of missing associations. Int J Bioinform Res Appl 11(6):503–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Fornell C (1982) Theoretical concepts, measurements, and meaning. Second Gener Multivar Anal 2(2):5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisoyi N, Gupta H, Padhy NP, Chakrapani GJ (2019) Prediction of daily sediment discharge using a back propagation neural network training algorithm: a case study of the narmada river, india. Int J Sedim Res 34(2):125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modeling with amos, eqs, and lisrel: comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. Int J Test 1(1):55–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davig T, Hall AS (2019) Recession forecasting using bayesian classification. Int J Forecast 35(3):848–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17(2–3):191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklund P, Wray T, Goodall P, Lawson A (2012) Design, information organisation and the evaluation of the virtual museum of the pacific digital ecosystem. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 3(4):265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(3):382–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia I, Sebastia L, Onaindia E (2011) On the design of individual and group recommender systems for tourism. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):7683–7692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun Assoc Inform Syst 4(1):1–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholitabar S, Alipour H, Costa C (2018) An empirical investigation of architectural heritage management implications for tourism: the case of Portugal. Sustainability 10(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (1999) Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. Eur J Oper Res 117(1):63–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong M, An S, Akerkar R, Camacho D, Jung JJ (2019) Cross-cultural contextualisation for recommender systems. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01479-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang R, Feng W, Fan M, Guo Q, Sun J (2017) Learning multi-path cnn for mural deterioration detection. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0656-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kar AK (2016) Bio inspired computing—a review of algorithms and scope of applications. Expert Syst Appl 59:20–32

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • KC C, Karuppannan S, Sivam A (2019) Assessing the values of living heritage sites in kathmandu valley: a community perspective. J Cult Herit Manag Sustain Dev 9(1):93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keitumetse S (2009) The eco-tourism of cultural heritage management (ect-chm): linking heritage and environment in the Okavango delta regions of Botswana. Int J Herit Stud 15(2–3):223–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keitumetse SO (2011) Sustainable development and cultural heritage management in Botswana: towards sustainable communities. Sustain Dev 19(1):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotsopoulos KI, Chourdaki P, Tsolis D, Antoniadis R, Pavlidis G, Assimakopoulos N (2019) An authoring platform for developing smart apps which elevate cultural heritage experiences: a system dynamics approach in gamification. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01505-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar NTG (2017) An analytical study of Odisha’s heritage prospectus in tourism development. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 5(10):2130–2135

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi D, Kocher S (2013) Perception of sacredness at heritage religious sites. Environ Behav 45(7):912–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G (2010) Rough set theory based on two universal sets and its applications. Knowl Based Syst 23(2):110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long PT, Perdue RR, Allen L (1990) Rural resident tourism perceptions and attitudes by community level of tourism. J Travel Res 28(3):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal D (2005) Natural and cultural heritage. Int J Herit Stud 11(1):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maji S, Arora S (2019) Decision tree algorithms for prediction of heart disease. In: Fong S, Akashe S, Mahalle P (eds) Information and communication technology for competitive strategies (LNNS), vol 40. Springer, New York, pp 447–454

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer É, Grussenmeyer P, Perrin JP, Durand A, Drap P (2007) A web information system for the management and the dissemination of cultural heritage data. J Cult Herit 8(4):396–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munjeri D (2004) Tangible and intangible heritage: from difference to convergence. Mus Int 56(1–2):12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navrud S, Ready RC (2002) Valuing cultural heritage: applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ngamsomsuke W, Hwang T, Huang C (2011) Sustainable cultural heritage tourism indicators. Int Conf Soc Sci Humanity IPEDR 5:516–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11(5):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1993) Rough sets: present state and the future. Found Comput Decis Sci 18(3–4):157–166

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C (2013) Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathi R, Acharjya DP (2018) A framework for prediction using rough set and real coded genetic algorithm. Arab J Sci Eng 43(8):4215–4227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rössler M (2006) World heritage cultural landscapes: a unesco flagship programme 1992–2006. Landsc Res 31(4):333–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Kim H et al (2018) Value-based profiles of visitors to a world heritage site: the case of suwon hwaseong fortress (in South Korea). Sustainability 11(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby D (2003) Determining the value of cultural goods: how much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us? J Cult Econ 27(3–4):275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timothy DJ, Boyd SW (2006) Heritage tourism in the 21st century: valued traditions and new perspectives. J Herit Tour 1(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy BK, Acharjya DP, Cynthya V (2011) A framework for intelligent medical diagnosis using rough set with formal concept analysis. Int J Artif Intell Appl 2(2):45–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YS, Wu MC, Wang HY (2009) Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. Br J Educ Technol 40(1):92–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Cui Q, Ballantyne R, Packer J (2013) Effective environmental interpretation at chinese natural attractions: the need for an aesthetic approach. J Sustain Tour 21(1):117–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y (2008) Probabilistic rough set approximations. Int J Approx Reason 49(2):255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon Y, Gursoy D, Chen JS (2001) Validating a tourism development theory with structural equation modeling. Tour Manag 22(4):363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu CP, Chancellor HC, Cole ST (2011) Measuring residents attitudes toward sustainable tourism: a reexamination of the sustainable tourism attitude scale. J Travel Res 50(1):57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Wang FY (2003) Reduction and axiomization of covering generalized rough sets. Inf Sci 152:217–230

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, VIT, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India

    D. P. Acharjya

  2. VIT Business School, VIT, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India

    Biswajit Acharjya

Authors
  1. D. P. Acharjya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Biswajit Acharjya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. P. Acharjya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

D. P. Acharjya declares that he has no conflict of interest. Biswajit Acharjya declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acharjya, D.P., Acharjya, B. An integrated partial least square and rough set approach for studying pilgrimage attitude towards cultural heritage of Odisha. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 15, 1697–1713 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01687-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01687-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation