Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Retrospective Study of Complications in Cranioplasty: 7-Year Period

  • Clinical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To discuss the intraoperative and postoperative complications of cranioplasty and management during a 7-year period.

Method

Retrospective study of 7-year period of 63 patients including both male and female.

Results

Highest experienced complications were seizures and dural tear, i.e., 6%, followed by EDH in 3% patients, hydrocephalus and pneumocephalus combined 3%, 1.6% CSF collection and flap necrosis each. All the complications were managed successfully.

Conclusion

Complications of cranioplasty can be managed by following sound surgical principles. Serious complications like meningitis, air embolism and death are rare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grant FC, Norcross NC (1939) Repair of cranial defects by cranioplasty. Ann Surg, 488–412.

  2. Sahoo NK, Rangan M, Tomar K, Bhat S (2017) Classification of residual cranial defects and selection of reconstruction materials. J Craniofac 28:1694–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Broughton E, Pobereskin L, Whitfield PC (2014) Seven years of cranioplasty in a regional neurosurgical centre. Br J Neurosurg 28:34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Clark SW, Bovenzi CD, Saigh M, Schwartz E, Kunkel ES, Efthimiadis-Budike AS, Jabbour P, Dalyai R, Rosenwasser RH, Tjoumakaris S (2015) Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases. J Neurosurg 123:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sahoo NK, Rangan M, Tomar K, Thakral A (2018) Complications of Cranioplasty. J Craniofac 29:1344–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Erdogen E, Duz B, Kocaoglu M, Izci Y, Sirin S, Timurkayank E (2003) The effect of cranioplasty on cerebral hemodynamics: evaluation with transcranial Doppler sonography. Neurol India 51:479–481.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, Honda T, Nakazawa H (2004) Sinking skin flap syndrome: a case of improved cerebral blood flow after cranioplasty. Ann Plast Surg 53:288–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sujit Kumar GS, Chacko AG, Rajshekhar V (2004) Unusual presentation of the “syndrome of the trephined”. Neurol India 52:504–505

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuo JR, Wang CC, Chio CC, Chang TJ (2004) Neurological improvement after cranioplasty analysis by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. J Clin Neurosci 11:486–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Muramatsu H, Nathan RD, Shimura T, Teramoto A (2000) Recovery of stroke hemiplegia through neurosurgical intervention in the chronic stage. Neuro Rehab 15:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muramatsu H, Takano T, Koike K (2007) Hemiplegia recovers after cranioplasty in stroke patients in the chronic stage. Int J Rehab Res 30:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakamoto S, Eguchi K, Kiura Y, Arita K, Kurisu K (2006) CT perfusion imaging in the syndrome of the sinking skin flap before and after cranioplasty. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108:583–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wachter D, Reineke K, Behm T, Rohde V (2013) cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: underestimated surgery-associated complications? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1293–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonis P, Frassanito P, Mangiola A, Nucci CG, Anile C, Pompucci A (2012) How complicated is filling a “hole”? J Neurotrauma 29:1071–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grant GA, Jolley M, Ellenbogen RG, Roberts TS, Gruss JR, Loeser JD (2004) Failure of autologous bone assisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg 100:163–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang W, Xiaofeng Y, Weiguo L, Gang S, Xuesheng Z, Fei C, Gu L (2007) Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg 8:526–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V (2003) Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long term follow up. J Craniofac Surg 14:144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bijlenga P, Zumufen D, Yilmaz H, Creisson E (2007) Orthostatic mesodiencephalic dysfunction after decompressive craniectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78:430–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gooch MR, Gin GE, Kenning TJ, German JW (2009) Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Foc 26:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beauchamp KM, Kaushak J, Moore EE, Bolles G, Rabb C, Seinfeld J, Szentirmai O, Sauaia A (2010) Cranioplasty after post injury decompressive craniotomy: is timing of the essence. J Trauma 69:270–274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ashayeri K, Jackson EM, Huang J, Brem H, Gordon CR (2016) Syndrome of the trephined: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 79:525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wachter D, Reineke K, Behm T, Rohde V (2016) Cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: underestimated surgery-associated complications. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1293–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Morina A, Kelmendi F, Morina Q, Dragusha S, Ahmeti F, Morina D, Gashi K (2012) Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts in abdominal wall experience with 75 cases in a post-war country Kosova. Surg NeurolInt 2:72

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chibbaro S, Di Rocco F, Mirone G, Fricia M, Makiese O, Emidio PD, Romano A, Vicault E, Menichelli A, Reiss A, Mateo J, Payen D, Guichard JP, George B, Bresson D (2011) Decompressive craniotomy and early cranioplasty for the management of severe head injury: a prospective multicenter study on 147 patients. World Neurosurg 75:558–562.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chang V, Hartzfeld P, Langlois M, Mahmood A, Seyfried D (2010) Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 112:1120–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chun HJ, Yi HJ (2011) Efficacy and safety of early cranioplasty, at least within 1 month. J Craniofac Surg 22:203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu Y, Hui G, Liu F, Wang Z, Tang Y, Gao S (2012) Survival and regeneration of deep freeze preserved autologous cranial bones after cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg 26:216–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ozaki W, Buchman SR (1998) Volume maintenance of onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton: micro-architecture versus embryologic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:291–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhury, S.K.R., Kumar, A. & Kumar, P. A Retrospective Study of Complications in Cranioplasty: 7-Year Period. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 20, 558–565 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01482-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01482-0

Keywords

Navigation