Abstract
Alloy 718 samples under two initial microstructural conditions, viz., solution annealed to form only γ phase (ST) and aged to precipitate only δ particles (DELTA), were deformed in tension till fracture in the temperatures range from 200°C–700°C. From the comparison of the evolved microstructure of deformed and undeformed specimens that have been subjected to similar thermal history, deformation induced precipitation could be identified. Deformation in the range of 550°C to 650°C promoted the precipitation of γ′ and γ″ phases in both structures. In case of DELTA alloy, the γ′ precipitation was found to precede the γ′ phase precipitation while no such preference for precipitation could be identified in ST specimens. This difference in the precipitation behaviour and the sequence of precipitation has been explained on the basis of the relative concentration of solutes in the matrix of the starting microstructures of ST and DELTA specimens.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eiselstein H L, ASTM Special Technical Publication, 369 (1965) 62.
Paulonis D F, Oblak J M, and Duvall D S, Trans ASM, 62 (1969) 611.
Chaturvedi M C, and Han Y F, Metal Sci, 17 (1983) 145.
Sundararaman M, Mukhopadhyay P, and Banerjee S, Metall Trans, 23A (1992) 2015.
Sundararaman M, and Mukhopadhyay P, High Temperature Materials and Processes, 11 (1993) 351.
Sundararaman M, Mukhopadhyay P, and Banerjee S, Metal Trans, 19A (1988) 453.
Desvallees Y, Bouzidi M, Bois F, and Beaude N, in Superalloy 718, 625 and various derivatives, (ed) Loria E A, TMS (1994) 281.
Davis J R, Metallurgy processing and properties of superalloys, in ASM specialty Handbook: Heat Resistant Materials, ASM International, Ohio, (1997) 221.
Moll J H, Maniar G N, and Muzyak D R, Metall Trans, 2 (1971). 2153.
Andrieu E, Ang N, Molinis R, and Pineau A, in Superalloy 718,. 625 and various derivatives, (ed) Loria E A, TMS (1994) 695.
Armida O B, and Radavich J F, in Superalloy 718, 625 and various derivatives, (ed) Loria E A, TMS (1991) 325.
Cozar R, and Pineau A, Metall Trans, 4 (1973) 47.
Burger J L, Biederman R R, and Couts W H, in Superalloy 718-Metallurgy and Applications, (ed) Loria E A, TMS (1991) 325.
Kim I H, and Kwun S I, Materials Sci Forum, 534 (2007) 213.
Singh R P, Hyzak J M, Howson T E, and Biederman R R, in Superalloy 718-Metallurgy and Applications, (ed) Loria E A, TMS (1991) 205.
Rongbin L, Mei Y, Wenchang L, and Xianchang H, J. of Materials Eng Performance, 11 (2002) 504.
Sundararaman M, and Mukhopadhyay P, Defects and Diffusion Forum, 213 (2003) 61.
Liu W C, Xiao F R, Yao M, Yuan H, Chen Z L, Jiang Z Q, Wang, Li W H, Material Sci Letters, 17 (1998) 245.
Dong J, Xie X, Xu Z and Zhang S, in Superalloy 718, 625 and various derivatives, (ed) Loria E A, TMS (1994) 649.
Nalawade S A, Ph.D Dissertation, Mumbai University, India (2009).
Nalawade S A, Sundararaman M, Singh J B, Verma A and Kishore R, Materials Sci Eng, A 527 (2010) 2906.
Sims C T, Stoloff N S and Hagel W C, in Superalloys II, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1987) 182.
Murthy K L, Detemple K, Kanert O, and Hosson J T M D, Metall Materials Tran, 29A (1998) 153.
Cao W D, in Superalloy 718, 625 and various derivatives, (ed) Loria E A, TMS (2005) 165.
Kennedy R L, in Superalloy 718, 625, 706 and various derivatives, (ed) Loria E A, TMS (2005) 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nalawade, S., Sundararaman, M., Singh, J.B. et al. Comparison of deformation induced precipitation behaviour in Alloy 718 under two microstructural conditions. Trans Indian Inst Met 63, 35–41 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-010-0006-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-010-0006-0