Abstract
This article discusses the temporalities of development and local politics in the context of the Yusufeli Dam project in Artvin, Turkey. Once finished, the project will lead to the submergence of the Yusufeli town center and 19 villages, the relocation of at least 20,000 people and the destruction of all agricultural land. The threat of destruction and eviction has in the past led to the mobilization of the residents of Yusufeli to establish alliances with international NGOs which successfully prevented the start of the project for more than a decade. More recently however, the earlier activist energy in the town gradually fizzled out to give way to the rise of bargaining with the state as the dominant form of political action. To be able to understand this shift from collective opposition to negotiation, I propose to study the spatio-temporal changes and sensibilities that dam planning, finance and construction elicit and become entangled with. If development materializes partly through the desires and emotional attachments of its target populations, I argue, then material and moral engagements of the local residents with past, present and future condition their political responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Çoruh River is located in northeast Turkey, originating from the northwest of the Erzurum-Kars Plateau to empty into the Black Sea near Batumi, Georgia. Approximately 91 % of the river basin’s drainage area lies on the Turkish side of the border. Anecdotal information shared with me by state bureaucrats and hydrologists indicates that until its demise in 1991 the USSR had successfully prevented the implementation of the development plan for geo-strategic reasons. For more on the political implications of the Çoruh River’s transboundary nature and its impact on the Turkish-Georgian relations, see Klaphake and Scheumann (2011).
An opinion poll conducted by the Yusufeli Municipality in 2013, despite serious methodological flaws, indicates that the town’s residents are currently divided in terms of their views on whether the project should start or not. Whereas 51 % think that the construction should go on, 49 % are against it.
For an article on the Southeastern Development Project in Turkey that explicitly takes its cue from James Scott and his notion of authoritarian high modernism, see (Çarkoğlu and Eder 2005).
For a very useful article in which a group of activists and NGO workers recount their own experience with the ECAs in the context of their campaign against the Ilısu Dam project in Turkey, see (Eberlein et al. 2010). It should be noted that Zeliha and the residents of Yusufeli closely collaborated with the authors of this article in their struggle against the Yusufeli Dam project. For another article on the Ilısu Dam project that, similar to this one, observes a connection between the decline of activism in Hasankeyf and the shift from an international to national regime of planning and finance, see (Ilhan forthcoming).
References
Abram S, Weszkalnys G (2011) Introduction: anthropologies of planning-temporality, imagination, and ethnography. Focaal—J Glob Hist Anthropol 61:3–18
Adaman, F, Akbulut B, Arsel M (forthcoming) Türkiye’de Kalkınmacılığı Yeniden Okumak: HES’ler ve Dönüşen Devlet-Toplum-Doğa İlişkileri. In: Aksu, C, Erensü, S, Evren E (eds) Sudan Sebepler: Türkiye’de Su ve Enerji Politikaları, İletişim Yayınları: Istanbul
Akpınar A, Kömürcü Mİ, Kankal M (2011) Development of hydropower energy in Turkey: the case of Çoruh river basin. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1201–1209
Altınbilek D (2002) The Role of dams in development. Int J Water Resour 18(1):9–24
Arsel M (2005) Reflexive Developmentalism? Toward an Environmental Critique of Modernization. In: Adaman F, Arsel M (eds) Environmentalism in Turkey: between democracy and development?. Ashgate, Aldershot
Auyero J (2011) Patients of the state: an ethnographic account of poor people’s waiting. Lat Am Res Rev 46(1):5–29
Auyero J, Swistun DB (2009) Flammable: environmental suffering in an Argentine Shantytown. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Baskan A (2011) Liberalization of Turkey’s hydroelectiricty sector. In: Kibaroglu A, Scheumann W, Kramer A (eds) Turkey’s water policy: National Frameworks and International Cooperation. Springer, Heidelberg
Baxstrom R (2011) Even governmentality begins as an image: institutional planning in Kuala Lumpur. Focaal—J Glob Hist Anthropol 61:61–72
Çarkoğlu A, Eder M (2005) Development alla Turca: the southeastern anatolia development project (GAP). In: Adaman F, Arsel M (eds) Environmentalism in Turkey: between democracy and development?. Ashgate, Aldershot
Eberlein C et al (2010) The Ilısu Dam in Turkey and the role of export credit agencies and NGO networks. Water Altern 3(2):291–312
Erensü S (2013) Abundance and scarcity amidst the crisis of ‘modern water’: The changing water-energy nexus in Turkey. In: Harris L, Goldin JA, Sneddon C (eds) Contemporary water governance in the global South: scarcity, marketization and participation. Routledge, Oxford
Fujikura R, Nakayama M (2009) Lessons learned from the World Commission on Dams. Int Environ Agreem: Polit, Law Econ 9:173–190
Guyer J (2007) Prophecy and the near future: thoughts on macroeconomic, evangelical, and punctuated time. Am Ethnol 34(3):409–421
Harms E (2013) Eviction time in the new Saigon: temporalities of displacement in the rubble of development. Cult Anthropol 28(2):344–368
Harris L (2009) States at the limit: tracing evolving state-society relations in the borderlands of southeastern Turkey. EJTS Eur J Turkish Stud 10 (online)
Harris L, Goldin JA, Sneddon C (2013) Contemporary water governance in the global South: scarcity, marketization and participation. Routledge, Oxford
Ilhan, A (forthcoming), Bir Baraj Karşıtı Hareketten Çok Daha Fazlası: Ilısu Vakası. In: Aksu, C, Erensü, S, Evren E (eds) Sudan Sebepler: Türkiye’de Su ve Enerji Politikaları, İletişim Yayınları, Istanbul
Islar M (2012a) Struggles for recognition: privatization of water use rights of Turkish rivers. Local Env: Int J Jus Sustain 17(3):317–329
Islar M (2012b) Privatized hydropower development in Turkey: a case of water grabbing? Water Altern 5(2):376–391
Keyder Ç (1987) State and class in Turkey: a study in capitalist development. Verso, London
Keyder Ç, Yenal Z (2013) Bildiğimiz Tarımın Sonu: Küresel İktidar ve Köylülük. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul
Kibaroğlu A, Scheumann W, Kramer A (2011) Trajectories of Turkey’s Water Policy. In: Kibaroglu A, Scheumann W, Kramer A (eds) Turkey’s water policy: national frameworks and international cooperation. Springer, Heidelberg
Klaphake A, Scheumann W (2011) Coruh River Basin: Hydropower Development and Transboundary Cooperation. In: Kibaroglu A, Scheumann W, Kramer A (eds) Turkey’s water policy: national frameworks and international cooperation. Springer, Heidelberg
Kolars J (1986) The hydro-imperative of Turkey’s search for energy. Middle East J 40(1):53–67
Kolars J, Mitchell WA (1991) The Euphrates river and the Southeast Anatolia development project. Southern Illinois University Press, Illinois
Laszczkowski M (2011) Building the future: construction, temporality, and politics in Astana. Focaal—J Glob Hist Anthropol 60:77–92
Leslie J (2005) Deep water: the epic struggle over dams, displaced people, and the environment. Picador, Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, London
McCully P (2001) Silenced rivers: the ecology and politics of large dams, Enlarged and Updated edn. Zed, London
Murray TL (2005) Beyond “the State” and failed schemes. Am Anthropol 107(3):383–394
Nestmann LV (1960) Hydro-electric schemes in Turkey. Geography 45(3):220–223
Nixon R (2010) Unimagined communities: developmental refugees, mega dams and monumental modernity. New Form 69:62–80
Routledge P (2003) Voices of the damned: discursive resistance amidst erasure in the Narmada Valley, India. Polit Geogr 22:243–270
Secor AJ (2007) Between longing and despair: state, space and subjectivity in Turkey. Environ Plan D Soc Space 25(1):33–52
Scott J (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven
Weiss E (2011) The interrupted sacrifice: hegemony and Moral Crisis among Israeli conscientious objectors. Am Ethnol 38(3):576–588
Acknowledgments
The project on which this publication is based was supported with funds from the Federal Ministry for Education and Research, Germany (funding code 01UG0713). I am responsible for the content of this publication. I am grateful to the editors of this special issue who kindly invited me to the conference on big dams at the Zentrum Moderner Orient in summer 2012 where I presented a very early version of this article. I would also like to thank Theo Barry-Born, Sagi Rotfogel, Teresa Schloegl and Silvia Schroecker and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable help and recommendations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evren, E. The rise and decline of an anti-dam campaign: Yusufeli Dam project and the temporal politics of development. Water Hist 6, 405–419 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12685-014-0120-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12685-014-0120-8