Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate awareness, beliefs, and opinions on genetics in a group of Brazilian college students from several courses. The study used the focus group technique with the participation of 19 students, divided into four groups. Also, it used the isotopic reading technique to analyze the material. The results were divided in four themes: the basic knowledge of genetics, the “new genetics,” including molecular biology and testing, genetic manipulation, and genetics and the media. The participants showed reasonable knowledge on the subject, obtained from various sources, including the printed press, the internet, documentaries, and fictional TV shows. Ethical issues were discussed comprehensively and the groups showed awareness on the hazards brought by genetic reductionism and the need to have some type of regulation regarding genetic manipulation and testing. It is necessary to broaden the debate about the progress in genetics because some of them will affect a significant number of people. This debate should include the lay public, which has been actively participating in decisions involving research and the use of new technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Broadcasted in Brazil in 2001 and showed again in 2011 (Globo television—the most popular TV in the country)
References
Asai A, Ohnishi M, Nishigaki E, Sekimoto M, Fukuhara S, Fukui T (2004) Focus group interviews examining attitudes toward medical research among the Japanese: a qualitative study. Bioethics 18:448–470
Bates B (2005) Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study. Public Understand Sci 14:47–65
Botkin J, Smith K, Croyle R, Baty B, Wylie J, Dutson D et al (2003) Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing. Am J Med Genet 118A:201–209
Bowen D, Batuello K, Raats M (2005) Marketing genetic tests: empowerment or snake oil? Health Educ Behav 32:676–685
Brasil, Ministério da Saúde (2009) Brasil livre da rubéola: campanha nacional de vacinação para eliminação da rubéola [Brazil free from rubella: nacional vaccination campaign for rubella elimination], Brasil, 2008–Brasília: Ministério da Saúde. http://www.saude.gov.br/bvs. Accessed 13 Mar 2012
Brent RL (1986) The effects of embryonic and fetal exposure to X-ray, microwaves, and ultrasound. ClinPerinatol 13:615–648
Cardoso C (1997) Narrativa, Sentido, História (Narrative, Sense, History). Papirus, Campinas
Castro M, Cunha C, Moreira P, Fernández R, Garcias G, Martino-Röth M (2006) Frequência das malformações múltiplas em recém-nascidos na Cidade de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, e fatores sócio-demográficos associados. [Frequency of multiple malformations in newborns in the city of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and associated socio-demographic factors]. Cad Saúde Pública 22:1009–1015
CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Public health genomics. Available at www.cdc.gov/genomics/gtesting/index.htm. Accessed 2 Aug 2012
Condit C (1999) The meaning of the gene: public debates about human heredity. University of Wisconsin Press, Wiscosin
Condit C, Condit D (2001) Blueprints and recipes: gendered metaphors for genetic medicine. J Med Humanit 22:29–39
Cwikel J (1997) Comments on the psychosocial aspects of the international conference on radiation and health. Environ Health Perspect 105(Suppl 6):1607–1608
Dastgiri S, Stone D, Le-Ha C, Gilmour W (2002) Prevalence and secular trend of congenital anomalies in Glasgow, UK. Arch Dis Child 86:257–263
Delatycki M, Allen K, Nisselle A, Collins V, Metcalfe S, duSart D et al (2005) Use of community genetic screening to prevent HFE-associated hereditary haemochromatosis. Lancet 366:314–316
Duden B, Samerski S (2007) Pop genes: an investigation of the gene in popular parlance. In: Burri R, Dumit J (eds) Biomedicine as culture. Instrumental practices, technoscientific knowledge, and new modes of life. Routledge, New York, pp 167–189
Duncan R, Reiser B (2007) Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: students’ understandings of molecular genetics. J Res Sci Teach 44:938–959
Garcias G, Schüler-Faccini L (2004) The beliefs of mothers in southern Brazil regarding risk-factors associated with congenital abnormalities. Genet Mol Biol 27:147–153
Gibbs A (1997) Focus Groups. Social Research Update 19, available at http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2010
Green R, Roberts J, Cupples L, Relkin N, Whitehouse P, Brown T et al (2009) Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 361:245–254
Greimas AJ (1987) On meaning: selected writings in semiotic theory. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Herrera J, Aravena T, Cifuentes L (2001) Malformaciones congénitas en Chile: un problema emergente período 1995–1999 [Congenital malformations in Chile: an emerging problem in period 1995–1999]. Verméd Chile 29:895–904
Horovitz D, Ferraz V, Dain S, Marques-de-Faria A (2012) Genetic services and testing in Brazil. J Community Genet. doi:10.1007/s12687-012-0096-y
Ingram-Waters M (2009) Public fiction as knowledge production the case of the Raelians’ cloning. Public Understand Sci 18:292–308
Kerr A, Cunninghan-Burley S, Amos A (1998) Drawing the line: an analysis of lay people’s discussions about the new genetics. Public Understand Sci 7:113–133
Khoury M, Bowen M, Burke W, Coates R, Dowling N, Evans J (2011) Current priorities for public health practice in addressing the role of human genomics in improving population health. Am J Prev Med 40:486–493
Krueger R (2004) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Lanie A, Jayaratne T, Sheldon J, Kardia S, Anderson E, Feldbaum M et al (2004) Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. J Genet Couns 13:305–320
Lippa R (2002) Gender, nature, and nurture. Erlbaum, Mawah
Luhmann N (2000) The reality of the mass media. Standford University Press, Standford
Marteau T, Lerman C (2001) Genetic risk and behavioural change. BMJ 322:1056–1059
Massarani L, Moreira I (2005) Attitudes towards genetics: a case study among Brazilian high school students. Public Understand Sci 14:201–212
Meisenberg G (2009) Designer babies on tap? Medical students’ attitudes to pre-implantation genetic screening. Public Understand Sci 18:149–166
Mezzomo C, Garcias G, Sclowitz M, Brum C, Fontana T et al (2007) Uso de folato na gestação e fatores associados. [Use of folate in pregnancy and associated factors]. Cad Saúde Pública 23:2716–2726
Miranda A (2003) A Prática Pedagógica do Professor de Alunos com Deficiência Mental [The pedagogic practice of the teacher of mentally deficient students] [thesis] Piracicaba, Unimep
Nelkin D, Lindee S (1995) The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon. Freeman, New York
Petersen A, Bunton R (2002) The new genetics and the public’s health. Routledge, New York
Rose N (2006) The politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Rovira S (2008) Metaphors of DNA: a review of the popularization. J Sci Comm 7:1–8
Schäfer M (2009) From public understanding to public engagement: an empirical assessment of changes in science. Coverage Sci Comm 30:475–505
Vecina Neto G (2002) Resolução RDC nº. 344, de 13 de dezembro de 2002. http://www.anvisa.gov.br/legis/resol/index_2002_rdc.htm. Accessed 13 Mar 2012.
Venville G, Treagust D (1998) Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. J Res Sci Teach 35:1031–1055
Wang C, Bowen D, Kardia S (2005) Research and practice opportunities at the intersection of health education, health behavior, and genomics. Health Educ Behav 32:686–701
Weiner K (2009) The tenacity of the coronary candidate: how people with familial hypercholesterolaemia construct raised cholesterol and coronary heart disease. Health 13:407–427
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Correia, P.S., Vitiello, P., Cardoso, M.H.C.d.A. et al. Conceptions on genetics in a group of college students. J Community Genet 4, 115–123 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-012-0125-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-012-0125-x