Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cooperation for Innovation in the European Union: Outlook and Evidences Using CIS for 15 European Countries

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cooperation for innovation is understood as an essential element in the innovation process of European firms. The aim is to compare how the different sources of information (external and internal) and cooperation for innovation are used in manufacturing and services in Europe using Community Innovation Survey (CIS) data for 15 European countries. The empirical study uses a sample of firms included in the CIS (2008), which covers 15 European countries and applies multivarious data analysis techniques to extract results. The results of this research suggest that firms use simultaneously different sources of information for cooperation, revealing different patterns of cooperation according to the activity sector in Europe. This paper brings some important insights about cooperation for innovation and suggests some patterns in Europe useful to design public policies, due de similar behavior of some countries grouped according with geography, development status or other economic features. Thus, this article seeks to frame the subject based on a literature review that raises a set of study hypotheses and presents an empirical study applied to cooperation for innovation in Europe using the CIS for 15 European countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvanitis, S. (2012). How do different motives for R&D cooperation affect firm performance? An analysis based on Swiss micro data. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22(5), 981–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, S., & Bolli, T. (2013). A comparison of national and international innovation cooperation in five European countries. Review of Industrial Organization, 43(3), 163–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschhoff, B., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Empirical evidence on the success of R&D cooperation—happy together? Review of Industrial Organization, 33(1), 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atallah, G. (2002). Vertical R&D spillovers, cooperation, market structure, and innovation. Economics of Innovattion and New Technology, 11, 179–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (1995). An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance—a contingency approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(4), 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2013). Cooperating with external partners: the importance of diversity for innovation performance. Working Paper No. 331, UZH Business Working Paper Series, University of Zurick, available on http://www.business.uzh.ch/forschung/wps.html

  • Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33, 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W., & Peters, J. (2000). University knowledge and innovation activities. In P. Saviotti, & B. Nooteboom (Eds.), Technology and knowledge: from the firm to innovation systems (pp. 80–117). Northampton: Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8), 1237–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2006). Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies. Review of Industrial Organization, 28, 401–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). Co-opetitive relationships in business networks - to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 20(5), 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger, A., Neyer, A.-K., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. (2010). Community-based innovation contests: where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., Evangelista, R., & Savona, M. (2006). Innovation and economic performance in services: a firm-level analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 435–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L., Costa, T., & Caiado, J. (2013). Determinants of innovation in a small open economy: a multidimensional perspective. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(3), 583–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, N., Carvalho, L., & Nunes, S. (2015). A methodology to measure innovation in European Union through the National Innovation System. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 6(2), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. J. (2008). Reconceptualizing the competition-cooperation relationship: a transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 288–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W., & Prencipe, A. (2008). Networks of innovation and modularity: a dynamic perspective. International Journal of Technology Management, 42(4), 414–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of cooperation: managing alliances, networks, and joint ventures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S., & Kim, G. M. (2003). Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier’s standpoint. Research Policy, 32(4), 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca, L. M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and crossfunctional collaboration: examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41(3), 614–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, K., & Duysters, G. (2007). Networking as a means to strategy change: the case of open innovation in mobile telephony. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 510–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (1999). Services and the search for relevant innovation indicators: a review of national and international surveys. Science and Public Policy, 26, 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drejer, I., & Jorgensen, B. H. (2005). The dynamic creation of knowledge: analysing public-private collaborations. Technovation, 25(2), 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, R. (2000). Sectoral patterns of technological change in services. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 9, 183–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria, P., Lima, F., & Santos, R. (2010). Cooperation in innovation activities: the importance of partners. Research Policy, 39(8), 1082–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. M., & Varga, A. (2002). Technological innovation and interfirm cooperation: an exploratory analysis using survey data from manufacturing firms in the metropolitan region of Vienna. International Journal of Technology and Management, 24(7/8), 724–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freel, M. S., & Harrison, R. T. (2006). Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: evidence from ‘Northern Britain’. Regional Studies, 40(4), 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M. (2010). Does R&D-cooperation behavior differ between regions? Industry and Innovation, 10(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D. R., He, J. Y., & Madhavan, R. (2006). Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: an empirical examination. Journal of Management, 32(4), 507–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.) Prentice-Hall, International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannelize, J. (2013). Co-innovation through multiple social identity processes: the story of a South African co-op owned business. European Business Review, 25(1), 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein, H. (2003). Innovation modes in the Swiss service sector: a cluster analysis based on firm-level data. Research Policy, 32, 845–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Zarco, A. I., Martínez-Ruiz, M. P., & Izquierdo-Yusta, A. (2011). The impact of market orientation dimensions on client cooperation in the development of new service innovations. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2008). Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 295–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschatzky, K. (1999). Innovation networks of industry and business-related services relations between innovation intensity of firms and regional inter-firm cooperation. European Planning Studies, 7(6), Special Issue: Innovation Networks, Collective Learning, and Industrial Policy in Regions of Europe, 737–757.

  • Lado, A., Boyd, N., & Hanlon, S. (1997). Competition, cooperation and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 110–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K., Collins, P. D., & Hull, F. M. (1999). Flexibility and standardization: test of a contingency model of product design-manufacturing integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(3), 248–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 349–369). London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsili, O., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Technology and the dynamics of industrial structure: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 791–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32, 1481–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, M. J., & Santamaria, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6–7), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, M. (1998). Efficiency of innovation systems in the transition countries. Economic Systems, 22, 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, C. P., Sarkar, S., & Carvalho, L. (2008). Innovation in services—how different from manufacturing? The Service Industries Journal, 28(10), 1339–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. B. (1972). The organisation of industry. Economic Journal, 82, 883–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siedschlag, L., Zhang, X., & Cahill, B. (2012). The effects of the internationalisation of firms on innovation and productivity. Papers/Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), available on http://www.esri.ie/UserFiles/publications/WP363/WP363.pdf

  • Silva, M. J., & Leitão, J. (2009). Cooperation in innovation practices among firms in Portugal: do external partners stimulate innovative advances? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 7(4), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srholec, M. (2014). Cooperation and innovative performance of firms: panel data evidence from the Czech Republic, Norway and the UK. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(1), 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srholec, M. (2015). Understanding the diversity of cooperation on innovation across countries: multilevel evidence from Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(1–2), 159–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31, 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigo, A., & Vence, X. (2012). Scope and patterns of innovation cooperation in Spanish service enterprises. Research Policy, 41(3), 602–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, L. C., Hirunyawipada, T., & Paswan, A. K. (2008). Cross-functional integration and new product success: an empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing, 72, 132–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1976). The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5, 212–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuola, O., & Hameri, A. P. (2006). Mutually benefiting joint innovation process between industry and big-science. Technovation, 26(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2002). Developing innovative competences: the role of institutional frameworks. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 497–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2014). Enhancing Europe’s competitiveness fostering innovation-driven entrepreneurship in Europe. Insight Report, January 2014.

  • Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is pleased to acknowledge financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (grant UID/ECO/04007/2013) and FEDER/COMPETE (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007659).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences and Management, Universidade Aberta and CEFAGE-Universidade de Évora, Rua Braamcamp, n° 90, piso 5, 1250-052, Lisbon, Portugal

    Luísa Carvalho

  2. Management and Economics Department, University of Beira Interior, Pólo IV, 6200-209, Covilhã, Portugal

    Maria José Madeira

  3. University of Beira Interior, Rua 1.° de Maio, Vivenda 3, 6230-339, Fundão, Portugal

    João Carvalho

  4. University of Beira Interior, Rua Formosa, N.°66, bloco B, 3.°B, 6300-837, Guarda, Portugal

    Dulcineia Catarina Moura

  5. University of Beira Interior, Av.ª Caminhos de Santiago, N 76, Santiago, 3500-063, Viseu, Portugal

    Filipe P. Duarte

Authors
  1. Luísa Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria José Madeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. João Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dulcineia Catarina Moura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Filipe P. Duarte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luísa Carvalho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carvalho, L., Madeira, M.J., Carvalho, J. et al. Cooperation for Innovation in the European Union: Outlook and Evidences Using CIS for 15 European Countries. J Knowl Econ 9, 506–525 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0520-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0520-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation