Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards High Impact Smart Cities: a Universal Architecture Based on Connected Intelligence Spaces

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smart cities constitute a new urban paradigm and a hegemonic phenomenon in contemporary city development. The concept envisages a data-enhanced future and efficiency gains made possible by automation and innovation in city activities and utilities. However, the way smart cities are created brings about two weaknesses. First, there is strong compartmentation of solutions and systems, which are developing in vertical markets for energy, transport, governance, safety, etc., silos with little interoperability and sharing of resources. Second, there is a low impact, some increase in efficiency, some reduction in costs, time gained, some decrease in CO2 emissions. There is an important knowledge gap about developing cross-sector, high-impact smart city systems. This paper deals with these challenges and investigates a different direction in smart city design and efficiency. We focus on ‘Connected Intelligence Spaces’ created in smart city ecosystems, which (a) have physical, social, and digital dimensions; (b) work as systems of innovation enabling synergies between human, machine, and collective intelligence; and (c) improve efficiency and performance by innovating rather than optimizing city routines. The research hypothesis we assess is about a universal architecture of high impact smart city projects, due to underlying connected intelligence spaces and cyber-physical-social systems of innovation. We assess this hypothesis with empirical evidence from case studies related to smart city projects dealing with safety (Vision-Zero), transportation (MaaS), and energy (positive energy districts). We highlight the main elements of operation and how high efficiency is achieved across these verticals. We identify commonalities, common innovation functions, and associations between functions, allowing us to define a common architecture enabling innovation and high performance across smart city ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data and material for the case studies comply with field standard.

References

  • Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & De-Pablos-Heredero, C. (2015). Information reuse in smart cities’ ecosystems. El profesional de la información, 24(6), 838–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsterdam Smart City. Projects. http://amsterdamsmartcity.com/projects

  • Appio, F. P., Lima, M., & Paroutis, S. (2019). Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, N. (2020). Update MaaS program.https://www.mobiliteitsplatform.nl/artikel/update-maas-programma?utm_source=verkeerinbeeld.nl&utm_medium=redirect&utm_campaign=mobplatform%202020&s=09

  • Batty, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence and smart cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(1), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belin, M. Å. (2012). Public road safety policy change and its implementation-Vision Zero a road safety policy innovation. Inst för folkhälsovetenskap/Dept of Public Health Sciences.

  • Belin, M. Å., Tillgren, P., & Vedung, E. (2012). Vision Zero–a road safety policy innovation. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 19(2), 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belissent, J. (2010). Getting clever about smart cities: New opportunities require new business models. Forrester for Ventor Strategy Professionals.

  • Bell, R. (2020). Sorry Smart Cities – You Completely Missed the Point. https://rb.gy/7i3axv

  • Bettencourt, L. M., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 104(17), 7301–7306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. M., Lobo, J., Strumsky, D., & West, G. B. (2010). Urban scaling and its deviations: Revealing the structure of wealth, innovation and crime across cities. PLoS One, 5(11), e13541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. (2017). Decision Making. Open access book.

  • Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of economic geography, 6(3), 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness, related variety and economic geography. In: Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Butler, L., Yigitcanlar, T., & Paz, A. (2020). how can smart mobility innovations alleviate transportation disadvantage? Assembling a conceptual framework through a systematic review. Applied Sciences, 10, 6306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A. (1989). Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caragliu, A., & Del Bo, C. F. (2019). Smart innovative cities: The impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 373–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramizaru, A., & Uihlein, A. (2020). Energy communities: an overview of energy and social innovation. European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 1(1), 41–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2019). Conclusion: Smart Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems. In Smart Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems (pp. 51–54). Springer, Cham.

  • Cheyne, C., & Imran, M. (2016). Shared transport. Energy Research and Social Science, 18, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City and County of San Francisco. (2015). Vision Zero San Francisco. Two-Year Action Strategy. Eliminating traffic deaths by 2024. http://visionzerosf.org/

  • City of Chicago. (2016). Vision Zero Action Chicago. Initiative to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries by 2026. http://visionzerochicago.org/

  • City of New York. (2014). New York Vision Zero Action Plan. http://www.nyc.gov/html/visionzero/pdf/nyc-vision-zero-action-plan.pdf

  • Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1999). The Associational Economy: Firms, regions, and innovation. OUP Catalogue.

  • Curtin, J., McInerney, C., & Gallachóir, B. Ó. (2017). Financial incentives to mobilise local citizens as investors in low-carbon technologies: A systematic literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 534–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, M. (2011). The embedded intelligence of smart cities. Intelligent Buildings International., 3(3), 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2015). Smart Cities: How rapid advances in technology are reshaping our economy and society, Version 1.0, https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tr/Documents/public-sector/deloitte-nl-ps-smart-cities-report.pdf

  • Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B.-A. (1993). Comparing the Danish and Swedish systems of innovation. In R. Nelson & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), National Systems of Innovations: A comparative analysis (pp. 265–298). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeler, C. & Dell, G. (eds) (2013). Best Practices in Urban ITS. Collection of Projects. Version 1.0. Urban ITS Expert Group”. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/its/road/action_plan/doc/2013-urban-its-expert_group-best-practice-collection.pdf

  • Elvik, R. (1999). Can injury prevention efforts go too far?: Reflections on some possible implications of Vision Zero for road accident fatalities. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31(3), 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, A., Hernandez-Mendez, A., Rehm, S. V., & Matthes, F. (2018). An Agile Framework for Modeling Smart City Business Ecosystems. In ICEIS (2) (pp. 39–50).

  • Finnan, S. (2020). Could Mobility-as-a-Service Come to Dublin? https://dublininquirer.com/2020/08/05/could-mobility-as-a-service-come-to-dublin

  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost & Sullivan. (2019). Smart Cities. https://ww2.frost.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SmartCities.pdf

  • Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. Joule, 1(3), 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2016). A comprehensive view of the 21st century city: Smartness as technologies and innovation in urban contexts. In Smarter as the new urban agenda (pp. 1–19). Springer, Cham.

  • Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Pronello, C., & Salanova Grau, J. (2018). Multi-stakeholder collaboration in urban transport. Transport, 33, 1079–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (2008). Organizational routines and performance feedback. Handbook of organizational routines, 187–204.

  • Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (Ed.). (1984). R&D Patents and Productivity. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, O., Otter, T., & Skiera, B. (2020). Estimating network effects in two-sided markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(1), 12–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IoT Analytics. (2020). Smart City Use Cases and Technology Report 2020. https://iot-analytics.com/product/smart-city-use-case-adoption-report-2020/

  • Ishida, T., & Isbister, K. (2000). Digital cities: Technologies, experiences, and future perspectives. Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B. (1986) ‘Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ American Economic Revue, No 76, 984–1001.

  • Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Revue, No, 79, 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaruzelski, B., Loehr, J., & Holman, R. (2013). Navigating the digital future. PwC Strategyand Global Innovation, 1000, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A. M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., Alonso González, M. J., & Narayan, J. (2017). Mobility as a service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning, 2(2), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. (2008). Intelligent cities and globalisation of innovation networks. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. (2006). The architecture of intelligent cities. Intelligent Environments, 6, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. (2016). Smart environments and smart growth: connecting innovation strategies and digital growth strategies. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 7(3), 240–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. (2018). Internet Platforms, Disruptive Innovation and Smart Growth. 20th Scientific Conference of the Hellenic Regional Association. Regions at a Turning Point. Athens, 4–5 June 2018.

  • Komninos, N. (2020). Smart Cities and Connected Intelligence: Platforms. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N., & Kakderi, C. (2019). Smart Cities in the Post-algorithmic Era: Integrating technologies, platforms and governance. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N., & Panori, A. (2019). The creation of city smartness: architectures of intelligence in smart cities and smart ecosystems. In Smart Cities in the Post-algorithmic Era. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Komninos, N., & Tsarchopoulos, P. (2013). Toward intelligent Thessaloniki: From an agglomeration of apps to smart districts. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N., Bratsas, C., Kakderi, C., & Tsarchopoulos, P. (2015). Smart city ontologies: Improving the effectiveness of smart city applications. Journal of Smart Cities, 1(1), 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Panori, A., Tsarchopoulos, P. (2019a) Smart city planning from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology 26(2), 3-20.

  • Komninos, N., Panori, A., and Kakderi, C. (2019b). Smart cities beyond algorithmic logic: digital platforms, user engagement and data science. In Smart Cities in the Post-algorithmic Era. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Landabaso, M. (1997). The promotion of innovation in regional policy: proposals for a regional innovation strategy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 9(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landabaso, M., Oughton, C., & Morgan, K. (1999). Learning regions in Europe: theory, policy and practice through the RIS experience (pp. 79–110). Systems and policies for the global learning economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple-helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of urban technology, 18(2), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Nicolás, C., & Meroño-Cerdán, Á. L. (2011). Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. International journal of information management, 31(6), 502–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., Laubacher, R., & Dellarocas, C. (2009). Harnessing crowds: Mapping the genome of collective intelligence.

  • Matyas, M., & Kamargianni, M. (2019). The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool. Transportation, 46, 1951–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2019). Governing Missions in the European Union. European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merit, T., Kertu, A., David, D., Peter, R., & Magdalena, R. (2017). Towards smart zero CO2 cities across Europe. Deliverable 8.2.: Replication toolkit v.1. http://smartencity.eu/media/smartencity_d8.2_replication_toolkit_.pdf

  • Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In P. Stoneman (ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Mitchell, W. J. (2007). Intelligent cities. UOC papers, 5, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, L., Bolici, R., & Deakin, M. (2017). The first two decades of smart-city research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Rosenberg, N. (Eds.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winters, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Only Zero Carbon (n.a.). http://www.onlyzerocarbon.org/definition.html

  • Panori, A., Kakderi, C., Komninos, N., Fellnhofer, K., Reid, A., & Mora, L. (2020). Smart systems of innovation for smart places: Challenges in deploying digital platforms for co-creation and data-intelligence. Land Use Policy, 104631.

  • Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovation Systems. STI Review, No. 14, Paris: OECD.

  • Perez, A. (2020). A No-Crash Course in Vision Zero Data. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1190&context=trec_seminar

  • Picon, A. (2015). Smart cities: a spatialised intelligence. John Wiley and Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polly, B., Kutscher, C., Macumber, D., Schott, M., Pless, S., Livingood, B., & Van Geet, O. (2016). From zero energy buildings to zero energy districts. Proceedings of the 2016 American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 21–26.

  • Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2004). Two-sided markets: an overview. Institut d’Economie Industrielle working paper.

  • Rodrigues, N., & Costa, P. (2020). Urban experimentation and smart cities: a Foucauldian and autonomist approach. Territory, Politics, Governance. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1777896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Rueda, D., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Khreis, H., & Frumkin, H. (2020). Autonomous vehicles and public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 41, 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saheb, Y., Shnapp, S., & Paci, D. (2019). From nearly-zero energy buildings to net-zero energy districts. European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salim, I. M., and Sulaiman, M. B. (2011). Organizational learning, innovation & performance: a study of Malaysian small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(12).

  • SCC Europe Staff. (2018). How smart car sharing companies are impacting city infrastructure. https://eu.smartcitiescouncil.com/article/how-smart-car-sharing-companies-are-impacting-city-infrastructure

  • Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In The future internet assembly (31–446). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

  • Simme, J. (2004). Innovation Networks and Learning Regions. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sougkakis, V., Lymperopoulos, K., Nikolopoulos, N., Margaritis, N., Giourka, P., & Angelakoglou, K. (2020). An investigation on the feasibility of near-zero and positive energy communities in the Greek context. Smart Cities, 3(2), 362–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stimpson, J. P., Wilson, F. A., Araz, O. M., & Pagan, J. A. (2014). Share of mass transit miles traveled and reduced motor vehicle fatalities in major cities of the United States. Journal of urban health, 91(6), 1136–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streitz, N. (2017). Reconciling humans and technology: The role of ambient intelligence. In: European Conference on Ambient Intelligence (pp. 1–16). Springer, Cham.

  • Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. M. (2009). The Fourth Paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery (Vol. 1). T. Hey (Ed.). Redmond, WA: Microsoft research.

  • The Office of Traffic Safety. (2016). Edmonton road safety strategy 2016 – 2020. https://www.edmonton.ca/transportation/VisionZero_EdmontonRoadSafetyStrategy_2016-2020.pdf

  • Tsampoulatidis, I., Ververidis, D., Tsarchopoulos, P., Nikolopoulos, S., Kompatsiaris, I., & Komninos, N. (2013). ImproveMyCity: an open source platform for direct citizen-government communication. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia, 839–842.

  • United Nations. (2019). The UN High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development, under the auspicies of the General Assembly (SDG Summit). 24–25 September 2019, UNHQ, New York. Summary of the President of the General Assembly. New York City, NY: United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/25200SDG_Summary.pdf

  • Urban Europe (n.a). Positive Energy Districts (PED). https://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/ped/

  • Vermesan, O., & Friess, P. (Eds.). (2013). Internet of things: converging technologies for smart environments and integrated ecosystems. River publishers.

  • Von Hippel, E. (2006). Democratizing innovation. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (2016). Free innovation (p. 240). The MIT Press.

  • Weber, M., & Zarko, I. P. (2019). A Regulatory View on Smart City Services. Sensors. Jan(19)2: 415.

  • Weinstock, M., & Gharleghi, M. (2013). Intelligent cities and the taxonomy of cognitive scales. Architectural Design, 83(4), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, G. B. (2017). Scale: the universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitelegg, J., & Gary Haq, G. (2006). Vision Zero: Adopting a target of zero for road traffic fatalities and serious injuries. Stockholm Environment Institute.

  • Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & Andersson, M. (2018). Industrial diversification in Europe: The differentiated role of relatedness. Economic Geography, 94(5), 514–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K. J., Boland, R. J., & Berente, N. (2010). The next wave of digital innovation: Opportunities and challenges: A report on the research workshop 'Digital Challenges in Innovation Research'. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1622170 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1622170

  • Zollo, M., Reuer, J. J., & Singh, H. (2002). Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 13(6), 701–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zygiaris, S. (2013). Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. Journal of the knowledge economy, 4(2), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zygiaris, S. (2017). Innovation chain intelligence (ICI). International Journal of Management, 4(2), 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. URENIO Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Nicos Komninos, Christina Kakderi, Anastasia Panori & Elena Sefertzi

  2. Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, UK

    Luca Mora

  3. Tallin University of Technology, Smart City Center of Excellence, Tallin, Estonia

    Luca Mora

Authors
  1. Nicos Komninos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina Kakderi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luca Mora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anastasia Panori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elena Sefertzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicos Komninos.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Design Thinking: Challenges and Opportunities

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Mora, L. et al. Towards High Impact Smart Cities: a Universal Architecture Based on Connected Intelligence Spaces. J Knowl Econ 13, 1169–1197 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00767-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00767-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation