Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preterm Birth Prevention: How Well Are We Really Doing? A Review of the Latest Literature

  • Review Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preterm birth is a global concern resulting in prematurity which is the leading cause of newborn death and long-term squeal in the survivors. In this review, we will summarize the data available to this date in regard to the causes, available interventions, and contemporary research for future applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379:2162–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hownson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE, editors. March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the children, WHO. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.

  3. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008;371:261–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parkinson JR, Hyde MJ, Gale C, et al. Preterm birth and the metabolic syndrome in adult life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;131:2012–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerkhof GF, Breukhoven PE, Leunissen RW, et al. Does preterm birth influence cardiovascular risk in early adulthood? J Pediatr. 2012;161:390–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steer P. The epidemiology of preterm labour. BJB. 2005;112:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:529–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iams JD. Clinical practice. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:254–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steer P. The epidemiology of preterm labour: why have advances not equated to reduce incidence? BJOG. 2006;113:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Lacritz EM. Epidemiology of late and moderate preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;3:120–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beinder E. Impact of iatrogenic preterm birth on newborn morbidity. Z Geburtshife Neonatol. 2011;215:133–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reddy UM, Ko CW, Raju TN, et al. Delivery indications at late-preterm gestations and infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2009;124:234–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beck S, Wodjdyla D, Say L, et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:31–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siddalinqappa H, Murthy MRN, Kulkarni P, N C A. Prevalence and factors influencing perinatal mortality in rural Mysore, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2796–699.

  15. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Rep. Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S2.

  16. Howson CP, Kinney MV, McDougall L, et al. Born to soon: preterm birth matters. Reprod Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawn JE, Kinney MV, Belizan JM, et al. Born too soon: accelerating actions for prevention and care of 15 million newborns born to soon. Reprod Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. LiST. The lives saved tool. An evidenced-based tool for estimating intervention impact. http://www.jhsph.edu/dept/ih/IIP/list/index.html.

  19. Richmond R. You’ve come a long way baby: women and the tobacco epidemic. Addiction. 2003;98:553–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lumley J, Chamberlain C, Dowswell T, et al. Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD001055.

  21. Coleman T, Chamberlain C, Davey MA, et al. Pharmacological interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD010078.

  22. Requejo J, Merialdi M, Althabe F, et al. Born too soon: care during pregnancy and childbirth to reduce preterm deliveries and improve health outcomes of the preterm baby. Reprod Health. 2013;10(Suppl 1):S4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smaill F, Vazquez JC. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 2:CD000490.

  24. Brocklehurst P, Gordon A, Heatley E, et al. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2013;1:CD000262.

  25. Michalowicz BS, Hodges JS, DiAngelis AJ, et al. Treatment of periodontal disease and the risk of preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1885–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacob PS, Nath S. Periodontitis among poor rural Indian mothers increases the risk of low birth weight babies: a hospital-based case control study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014;44:85–93.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fromerd JM, Jones L, Flenady V, et al. Prenatal administration of progesterone for preventing preterm birth in women considered to be at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD004947.

  28. Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:18–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Aquedelo A, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2:124.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Serra V, Perales A, Mesequer J, et al. Increased doses of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a randomized controlled double-blind multicenter trial. BJOG. 2013;120:50–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aboulghar MM, Aboulghar MA, Amin YM, et al. The use of vaginal natural progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25:133–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Maher MA, Abdelaziz A, Ellaithy M, et al. Prevention of preterm birth: a randomized trial of vaginal compared with intramuscular progesterone. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;2:215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Roberts D, et al. Cervical stich (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD008991.

  34. Bergella V, Mackeen AD. Cervical length screening with ultrasound-indicated cerclage compared with history-indicated cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:148–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:181–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Conde-Aqudelo A, Romero R, Nicolaides K, et al. Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:42e1–18.

  37. Goya M, Pratcorona L, Merced C, et al. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1800–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Abdel-Aleem MA. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD007873.

  39. Liem S, Schuit E, Hegeman M, et al. Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1341–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Alfirevic Z, Owen J, Carreras Moratonas E, et al. Vaginal progesterone, cerclage or cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in asymptomatic singleton pregnant women with a history of preterm birth and a sonographic short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:146–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Berghella V. Universal cervical length screening for prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;10:653–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee, Berghella V. Progesterone and preterm birth prevention: translating clinical trials data into clinical practice. Am J Obstet Genecol. 2012;206:376–86.

  43. Berghella V, Baxter JK, Hendrix MW. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Databases Syst Rev. 2013;1:CD007235.

  44. Simhan HN, Caritis SN. Prevention of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:744–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hubinont C, Debeieve F. Prevention of preterm labour: 2011 update on tocolysis. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:941057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kimber-Trojnar Z, Leszczynska-Gorzelak B, Marciniak B, et al. Tocolytic therapy in threatened preterm labor. Ginekol Op. 2010;81:120–4.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hass DM, Caldwell DM, Kirkpatrick P, et al. Tocolytic therapy for preterm delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;345:e6226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Van Vilet EO, Boormans EM, de Lange TS, et al. Preterm labor: current pharmacotherapy options for tocolysis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;6:787–97.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jørgensen JS, Weile LK, Lamont RF. Preterm labor: current tocolytic options for the treatment of preterm labor. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15:585–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mackeen AD, Seibel-Seamon J, Muhammad J, et al. Tocolytics for preterm premature rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD007062.

  51. Kenyon SL, Taylor DJ, Tarnow-Mordi W, ORACLE Collaborative Group. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE 1 randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;357:979–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones DR, et al. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with preterm rupture of membranes: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE I trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1310–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kenyon S, Boulvain M, Neilson JP. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Databases Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD001058.

  54. Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones DR, et al. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE II trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1319–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Avraham S, Seidman DS. The multiple birth epidemic: revisited. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62:386–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bhattacharya S, Kamath MS. Reducing multiple births in assisted reproductive technology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:191–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Ozturk O, et al. Number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD003416.

  58. Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Fuchs KM, Young OM, et al. Non spontaneous late preterm birth: etiology and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:456.e1–6.

  59. Morais M, Mehta C, Murphy K, et al. How often are late preterm births the result of non-evidence based practices: analysis from a retrospective cohort study at two tertiary referral centres in a nationalized healthcare system. BJOG. 2013;12:1508–14.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Power ML, Henderson Z, Behler JE, et al. Attitudes and practices regarding late preterm birth among American obstetricians-gynecologists. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013;22:167–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Chang HH, Larson J, Blencowe H, et al. Preventing preterm birth: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet. 2013;9862:223–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Burnum KE, Hirota Y, Baker ES, et al. Uterine deletion of Trp53 compromises antioxidant responses in the mouse decidua. Endocrinology. 2012;153:4568–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Cha J, Bartos A, Eqashira M, et al. Combinatory approaches prevent preterm birth profoundly exacerbated by gene–environment interactions. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:4063–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. McElroy JJ, Gutman CE, Shaffer CM, et al. Maternal coding variants in complement receptor 1 and spontaneous idiopathic preterm birth. Hum Genet. 2013;132:935–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kim J, Stirling KJ, Cooper ME, et al. Sequence variants in oxytocin pathway genes and preterm birth: a candidate gene association study. BMC Med Genet. 2013;14:77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Karjalainen MK, Huusko JM, Ulvila J, et al. A potential novel spontaneous preterm birth gene, AR, identified by linkage and association analysis of X chromosomal markers. PLoS One. 2012;12:e51378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liss Maternitry Hospital, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Sarit Avraham & Fouad Azem

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Daniel Seidman (Senior Physician)

  3. The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Sarit Avraham, Fouad Azem & Daniel Seidman (Senior Physician)

Authors
  1. Sarit Avraham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fouad Azem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Seidman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Seidman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avraham, S., Azem, F. & Seidman, D. Preterm Birth Prevention: How Well Are We Really Doing? A Review of the Latest Literature. J Obstet Gynecol India 64, 158–164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0571-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0571-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation