Skip to main content
Log in

On Capturing Rent from a Non-renewable Resource International Monopoly: Prices Versus Quantities

  • Published:
Dynamic Games and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we model the case of an international non-renewable resource monopolist as a dynamic game between a monopolist and n importing countries governments, and investigate whether a tariff on resource imports can be advantageous for consumers in importing countries. We analyse both the case of a price-setting monopolist and the case of a quantity-setting monopolist. We find that a tariff is advantageous for consumers, even when there is no commitment to the trade policy and importing countries do not coordinate their policies. Using a numerical example, we find that a tariff is more advantageous for the importing countries if the monopolist chooses the quantity instead of the price and that the optimal temporal path when the monopolist chooses the price is consistently below the optimal temporal path when the monopolist chooses the quantity for the entire period of exploitation of the resource. Nevertheless, the variation in total welfare between the two regimens is small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alepuz MD, Rubio SJ (2009) Foreign monopoly and self-enforcing tariff agreements under integrated markets: prices versus quantities. Investig Econ 33:39–68

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstrom TC (1982) On capturing oil rents with a national excise tax. Am Econ Rev 72:194–201

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brander JA, Djajic S (1983) Rent-extracting tariffs and the management of exhaustible resources. Can J Econ 16:288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brander JA, Spencer BJ (1984) Trade warfare: tariffs and cartels. J Int Econ 16:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chou SJ-H, Long NV (2009) Optimal tariffs on exhaustible resources in the presence of cartel behavior. Asia-Pac J Account Econ 16:239–254

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris C, Vickers J (1995) Innovation and natural resources: a dynamic game with uncertainty. Rand J Econ 26:418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karp L (1984) Optimality and consistency in a differential game with non-renewable resources. J Econ Dyn Control 8:73–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Karp L (1991) Monopsony power and the period of commitment in nonrenewable resource markets. In: Phlips L (ed) Commodity, futures and financial markets. Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karp L, Newbery DM (1991) Optimal tariffs on exhaustible resources. J Int Econ 30:285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karp L, Newbery DM (1992) Dynamically consistent oil import tariffs. Can J Econ 25:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katrak H (1977) Multi-national monopolies and commercial policy. Oxf Econ Pap 29:283–291

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kemp MC, Long NV (1980) Optimal tariffs on exhaustible resources. In: Kemp MC, Long NV (eds) Exhaustible resources, optimality, and trade. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis T, Lindsey R, Ware R (1986) Long-term bilateral monopoly: the case of an exhaustible resource. Rand J Econ 17(1):89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liski M, Tahvonen O (2004) Can carbon tax eat OPEC’s rents? J Environ Econ Manag 47:1–12

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Maskin E, Newbery D (1990) Disadvantageous oil tariffs and dynamic consistency. Am Econ Rev 80:143–156

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keutiben OK (2010) On capturing foreign oil rents. Typescript, Department of Economics, University of Montreal

  17. Olsen TE (1993) Perfect equilibrium timing of a backstop technology—limit pricing induced by trigger zones. J Econ Dyn Control 17:123–151

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Robson AJ (1983) OPEC versus the west: a robust equilibrium. J Environ Econ Manag 10:18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubio SJ (2005) Tariff agreements and non-renewable resource international monopolies: prices versus quantities. Working paper, Valencian Institute of Economic Researches

  20. Rubio SJ (2007) On capturing rent from a non-renewable resource international monopoly. A dynamic game approach. Working paper, BBVA Foundation

  21. Rubio SJ, Escriche L (2001) Strategic Pigouvian taxation, stock externalities and polluting non-renewable resources. J Public Econ 79:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Strand J (2011) Who gains and who loses by fossil-fuel taxes and caps: importers versus exporters. Typescript, Development Economics Group, World Bank

  23. Svedberg P (1979) Optimal tariff policy on imports from multinationals. Econ Rec 55:64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tahvonen O (1996) Trade with polluting nonrenewable resources. J Environ Econ Manag 30:1–17

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Wirl F (1994) Pigouvian taxation of energy for flow and stock externalities and strategic, noncompetitive energy pricing. J Environ Econ Manag 26:1–18

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wirl F (2011) Global warming: prices versus quantities from a strategic point of view. Typescript, Department of Business Administration, University of Vienna

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santiago J. Rubio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rubio, S.J. On Capturing Rent from a Non-renewable Resource International Monopoly: Prices Versus Quantities. Dyn Games Appl 1, 558–580 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-011-0035-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-011-0035-2

Keywords

Navigation