Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Habitat Loss, the Dynamics of Biodiversity, and a Perspective on Conservation

  • Synopsis
  • Published:
AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Anderson, R.M., and R.M. May. 1991. Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: A review. Oikos 71: 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A., O. Ovaskainen, and I. Hanski. In press. Size and genetic composition of the colonizing propagules in a butterfly metapopulation. Oikos.

  • Brooks, T.M., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. da Fonseca, A.B. Rylands, W.R. Konstant, P. Flick, J. Pilgrim, et al. 2002. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 16: 909–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart, S., M. Walpole, B. Collen, A. van Strien, J.P.W. Scharlemann, R.E.A. Almond, J.E.M. Baillie, B. Bomhard, et al. 2010. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent decline. Science 328: 1164–1168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J.T. 1956. The modification of mid-latitude grasslands and forests by man. In Man’s role in changing the face of the earth, ed. W.L. Thomas, 721–736. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. 1997. Countryside biogeography and the provision of ecosystem services. In Nature and human society: The quest for a sustainable world, ed. P. Raven, 104–113. Washington: National Research Council, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, R., and C. Rosenzweig. 2010. Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 19627–19632.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellegren, H., P. Savolainen, and B. Rosen. 1996. The genetical history of an isolated population of the endangered grey wolf Canis lupus: A study of nuclear and mitochondrial polymorphisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 351: 1661–1669.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. 1997. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 603–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 487–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T., and L.E. Alexander. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham, R., J.D. Ballou, and D.A. Briscoe. 2002. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K.J., S.F. Jackson, A. Nagy, L. Cantú-Salazar, and M. Johnson. 2008. Protected areas in Europe. Principles and practice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1134: 97–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M.E., and M.E. Soulé. 1986. Minimum viable populations: Process of species extinction. In Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity, ed. M.E. Soulé, 19–34. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom, M.J., and T.E. Preuninger. 2001. Inbreeding depression is not diminished in isolated subpopulations of Clarkia concinna concinna (Onagraceae). Evolutionary Ecology 15: 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groom, M.J., G.K. Meffe, and C.R. Carroll. 2006. Principles of conservation biology. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurd, D.B., T.D. Nudds, and D.H. Rivard. 2001. Conservation of mammals in eastern North American wildlife reserves: How small is too small? Conservation Biology 15: 1355–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyllenberg, M., K. Parvinen, and U. Dieckmann. 2002. Evolutionary suicide and evolution of dispersal in structured metapopulations. Journal of Mathematical Biology 45: 79–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haikola, S., W. Fortelius, R.B. O′Hara, M. Kuussaari, N. Wahlberg, I.J. Saccheri, M.C. Singer, and I. Hanski. 2001. Inbreeding depression and the maintenance of genetic load in Melitaea cinxia metapopulations. Conservation Genetics 2: 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. 2005. The shrinking world: Ecological consequences of habitat loss. Oldendorf/Luhe: International Ecology Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I., and O. Ovaskainen. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404: 755–758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I., and O. Ovaskainen. 2002. Extinction debt at extinction threshold. Conservation Biology 16: 666–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I., and O.E. Gaggiotti (eds.). 2004. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L.F. 1984. The fragmented forest. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, P.W. 1995. Gene flow and genetic restoration—The Florida panther as a case study. Conservation Biology 9: 996–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino, M., and I. Hanski. 2001. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. American Naturalist 157: 495–511.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, N.E., and E.S. Zavaleta. 2009. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 142: 14–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, K., and M. Lynch. 2001. Metapopulation extinction caused by mutation accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 2928–2933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M.D. 2000. Gap analysis: Concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecology 15: 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kermack, W.O., and A.G. McKendrick. 1927. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 155: 700–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455–1460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. American Naturalist 142: 911–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1994. Risk of population extinction from fixation of new deleterious mutations. Evolution 48: 1460–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1998. Anthropogenic, ecological and genetic factors in extinction and conservation. Researches on Population Ecology 40: 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Buerger. 1995. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. American Naturalist 146: 489–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H., and E.O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, T., B. Stille, and R. Shine. 1996. Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders Vipera berus. Biological Conservation 75: 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, J.P., A.C. Martensen, M. Dixo, L.C. Bernacci, M.C. Ribeiro, A.M.G. Teixeira, and R. Pardini. 2009. Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region. Biological Conservation 142: 1166–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, M., M.C. Singer, W. Fortelius, K. Schöps, and I. Hanski. 2001. Experimental confirmation that inbreeding depression increases extinction risk in butterfly populations. American Naturalist 157: 237–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Opdam, P., J. Verboom, and R. Pouwels. 2003. Landscape cohesion: An index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecology 18: 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardini, R., A.D. Bueno, T.A. Gardner, P.I. Prado, and J.P. Metzger. 2010. Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: Regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes. Plos One 5: e13666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primmer, E., and H. Karppinen. 2010. Professional judgment in non-industrial private forestry: Forester attitudes and social norms influencing biodiversity conservation. Forest Policy and Economics 12: 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prugh, L.R., K.E. Hodges, A.R.E. Sinclair, and J.S. Brashares. 2008. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 20770–20775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, A., A. Schulman, and T. Kontula (eds.). 2008. Assessment of threatened habitat types in Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Suomen Ympäristökeskus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A.S.L., S.J. Andelman, et al. 2004. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roger, E., S.W. Laffan, and D. Ramp. 2011. Road impacts a tipping point for wildlife populations in threatened landscapes. Population Ecology 53: 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronce, O., and I. Olivieri. 2004. Life history evolution in metapopulations. In Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations, ed. I. Hanski, and O.E. Gaggiotti, 227–257. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri, I.J., M. Kuussaari, M. Kankare, P. Vikman, W. Fortelius, and I. Hanski. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, T. 2006. Occurrence of deformed fish and their fitness-related traits in Kirikuchi charr, Salvelinus leucomaenis japonicus, the southernmost population of the genus Salvelinus. Zoological Science 23: 593–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.M., F.W. Davis, R.G. McGhie, R.G. Wright, C. Groves, and J. Estes. 2001. Nature reserves: Do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity? Ecological Applications 11: 999–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E., J.A. Estes, J. Berger, and C.M. Del Rio. 2003. Ecological effectiveness: Conservation goals for interactive species. Conservation Biology 17: 1238–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., R.M. May, C.L. Lehman, and M.A. Nowak. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westemeier, R.L., J.D. Brawn, S.A. Simpson, T.L. Esker, R.W. Jansen, J.W. Walk, E.L. Kershner, J.L. Bouzat, et al. 1998. Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science 282: 1695–1698.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, M.C., and N.H. Barton. 1997. The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics 146: 427–441.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WWF report. 2001. Insight into Europe’s forest protection. Gland, Switzerland: WWF.

  • Virkkala, R., K.T. Korhonen, R. Haapanen, and K. Aapala. 2000. Metsien ja soiden suojelutilanne metsä- ja suokasvillisuusvyöhykkeittäin valtakunnan metsien 8. inventoinnin perusteella. Helsinki, Finland: Suomen Ympäristökeskus, Metsäntutkimuslaitos.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Renata Pardini for advice on the occurrence of small mammals in the Brazilian Atlantic forest region, Sami Ojanen for preparing the figures, and Anni Arponen, Mar Cabeza, Heini Kujala, Russ Lande, Joona Lehtomäki, Laura Meller, Reed Noss, Otso Ovaskainen, Renata Pardini, and Eeva Primmer for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, PL 65, 00014, Helsinki, Finland

    Ilkka Hanski

Authors
  1. Ilkka Hanski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilkka Hanski.

Additional information

A synopsis by the Crafoord Laureate in Biosciences 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanski, I. Habitat Loss, the Dynamics of Biodiversity, and a Perspective on Conservation. AMBIO 40, 248–255 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0147-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0147-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation