Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vermicomposting amended with microalgal biomass and biochar produce phytopathogen-resistant seedbeds for vegetables

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vermicomposting is used to treat and recycle organic waste to be utilized in agriculture. This project aimed to improve the product of vermicomposting by adding biochar and microalgal biomass to the process. Experiment to vermicompost (60 days) mixed organic waste was carried out preparing 16 different treatments. The best treatment appeared to be the earthworm Eisenia fetida, 6% biochar, and the biomass of the microalgae Navicula sp. amended to the process. The product was mature vermicompost with pH 7, cation exchange capacity 70 cmolc kg−1, and the C:N ratio 9.5. All products were used as seedbeds and tested for the plant growth promotion of the vegetables Solanum lycopersicum, Capsicum annuum, and Solanum melongena. The best vermicomposting product increased plant growth, reduced the disease incidence of the leaves, and improved the disease resistance of the seeds the plants produced. Plant vigor index was highest in the best treatment varying between 4600 and 5000 depending on the plant species. For comparison, the lowest values were under 1000. Disease resistance was low for the best treatment (5%–15%) compared to the high values over 60%. The seeds ripened in the experimental plants had acquired resistance against the experimentally inoculated phytopathogen Pythium sp., known to commonly destroy seeds. In the best treatment, more than 90% of the seeds germinated while in all other treatments less than 56% germinated. In conclusion, the vermicomposting using the earthworm Eisenia fetida, 6% biochar, and the biomass of the microalgae Navicula sp. produced seedbed substate that improved the growth of vegetables and suppressed phytopathogens. The seedbed can be used in sustainable agriculture to reduce the use of fertilizers and chemicals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pellejero G, Rodriguez K, Ashchkar G, Vela E, Garcia-Delgado C, Jimenez-Ballesta R (2020) Onion waste recycling by vermicomposting: nutrients recovery and agronomical assessment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:3289–3296

  2. Karmegam N, Jayakumar M, Govarthanan M et al (2021) Precomposting and green manure amendment for effective vermitransformation of hazardous coir industrial waste into enriched vermicompost. Bioresour Technol 319:124136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mupambwa HA, Mnkeni PNS (2018) Optimizing the vermicomposting of organic wastes amended with inorganic materials for production of nutrient-rich organic fertilizers: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:10577–10595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alshehrei F, Ameen F (2021) Vermicomposting: a management tool to mitigate solid waste. Saudi J Biol Sci 28(6):3284–3293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhi-Wei S, Tao S, Wen-Jing D, Jing W (2019) Investigation of rice straw and kitchen waste degradation through vermicomposting. J Environ Manage 243:269–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad A, Aslam Z, Bellitürk K, Iqbal N et al (2021) Vermicomposting methods from different wastes: an environment friendly, economically viable and socially acceptable approach for crop nutrition: a review. Int J Food Sci Agric 5(1):58–68. https://doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2021.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gong X, Cai L, Li S et al (2018) Bamboo biochar amendment improves the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida and the quality of green waste vermicompost. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 156:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao Y, Tian Y, Wu Q et al (2021) Vermicomposting of livestock manure as affected by carbon-rich additives (straw, biochar and nanocarbon): a comprehensive evaluation of earthworm performance, microbial activities, metabolic functions and vermicompost quality. Bioresour Technol 320:124404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Budroni M, Mannazzu I, Zara S et al (2020) Composition and functional profiling of the microbiota in the casts of Eisenia fetida during vermicomposting of brewers’ spent grains. Biotechnol Rep 25:e00439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ievinsh G, Andersone-Ozola U, Zeipicna S (2020) Comparison of the effects of compost and vermicompost soil amendments in organic production of four herb species. Biol Agric Hortic 36:267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pietikäinen J, Kiikkilä O, Fritze H (2000) Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effect on the microbial community of the underlying humus. Oikos 89:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Teodoro M, Trakal L, Gallagher BN et al (2020) Application of co-composted biochar significantly improved plant-growth relevant physical/chemical properties of a metal contaminated soil. Chemosphere 242:125255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagemann N, Joseph S, Schmidt H-P et al (2017) Organic coating on biochar explains its nutrient retention and stimulation of soil fertility. Nat Commun 8:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rachidi F, Benhima R, Kasmi Y et al (2021) Evaluation of microalgae polysaccharides as biostimulants of tomato plant defense using metabolomics and biochemical approaches. Sci Rep 11:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yatoo AM, Ali MN, Baba ZA, Hassan B (2021) Sustainable management of diseases and pests in crops by vermicompost and vermicompost tea A review. Agron Sustain Dev 41:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ameen F, Al-Homaidan AA (2021) Compost inoculated with fungi from a mangrove habitat improved the growth and disease defense of vegetable plants. Sustainability 13:124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ertani A, Francioso O, Tinti A et al (2018) Evaluation of seaweed extracts from Laminaria and Ascophyllum nodosum spp. as biostimulants in Zea mays L. using a combination of chemical, biochemical and morphological approaches. Front Plant Sci 9:428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manjunath M, Prasanna R, Nain L et al (2010) Biocontrol potential of cyanobacterial metabolites against damping off disease caused by Pythium aphanidermatum in solanaceous vegetables. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 43:666–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tomas CR (1997) Identifying marine phytoplankton. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-693018-4.X5000-9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hussain F, Shah SZ, Ahmad H et al (2021) Microalgae an ecofriendly and sustainable wastewater treatment option: biomass application in biofuel and bio-fertilizer production. A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 137:110603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonçalves AL (2021) The use of microalgae and cyanobacteria in the improvement of agricultural practices: a review on their biofertilising, biostimulating and biopesticide roles. Appl Sci 11:871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiaiese P, Corrado G, Colla G et al (2018) Renewable sources of plant biostimulation: microalgae as a sustainable means to improve crop performance. Front Plant Sci 9:1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Coppens J, Grunert O, Van Den Hende S et al (2016) The use of microalgae as a high-value organic slow-release fertilizer results in tomatoes with increased carotenoid and sugar levels. J Appl Phycol 28:2367–2377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bumandalai O, Tserennadmid R (2019) Effect of Chlorella vulgaris as a biofertilizer on germination of tomato and cucumber seeds. Int J Aquat Biol 7:95–99

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mutale-Joan C, Redouane B, Najib E et al (2020) Screening of microalgae liquid extracts for their bio stimulant properties on plant growth, nutrient uptake and metabolite profile of Solanum lycopersicum L. Sci Rep 10:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jindo K, Audette Y, Higashikawa FS et al (2020) Role of biochar in promoting circular economy in the agriculture sector. Part 1: a review of the biochar roles in soil N, P and K cycles. Chem Biol Technol Agric 7:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Waqas M, Shahzad R, Hamayun M et al (2018) Biochar amendment changes jasmonic acid levels in two rice varieties and alters their resistance to herbivory. PLoS One 13:e0191296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaiswal AK, Alkan N, Elad Y et al (2020) Molecular insights into biochar-mediated plant growth promotion and systemic resistance in tomato against Fusarium crown and root rot disease. Sci Rep 10:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ubalde J, Payan E, Sort X, Rosas J, Gómez N, Sánchez M, Arbestain M (2014) Application of biochar amendments to Mediterranean soils: effects on vine growth and grape quality. Conference: Geophysical Research Abstracts, vol. 16

  30. Amooaghaie R, Golmohammadi S (2017) Effect of vermicompost on growth, essential oil, and health of Thymus Vulgaris. Compost Sci Util 25:166–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jayakumar M, Sivakami T, Ambika D, Karmegam N (2011) Effect of turkey litter (Meleagris gallopavo L.) vermicompost on growth and yield characteristics of paddy, Oryza sativa (ADT-37). Afr J Biotechnol 10:15295–15304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang F, Wang X, Song N (2021) Biochar and vermicompost improve the soil properties and the yield and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in plastic shed soil continuously cropped for different years. Agric Ecosyst Environ 315:107425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chukwujindu MAI, Egun AC, Emuh FN, Isirimah NO (2006) Compost maturity evaluation and its significance to agriculture. Pak J Biol Sci 9:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  34. Siles-Castellano AB, López MJ, Jurado MM et al (2020) Industrial composting of low carbon/nitrogen ratio mixtures of agri-food waste and impact on compost quality. Bioresour Technol 316:123946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Were SA, Narla R, Mutitu EW et al (2021) Mechanisms of biochar and vermicompost in suppression of root rot fungal disease of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Afr J Biol Sci 3:65–86

    Google Scholar 

  36. Das S, Wadud A, Khokon MAR (2021) Evaluation of the effect of different concentrations of organic amendments and botanical extracts on the mortality and hatching of Meloidogyne javanica. Saudi J Biol Sci 28(7):3759–3767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Carr EA, Nelson EB (2014) Disease-suppressive vermicompost induces a shift in germination mode of Pythium aphanidermatum zoosporangia. Plant Dis 98:361–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Charoenrak P, Chamswarng C, Intanoo W, Keawprasert N (2019) The effects of vermicompost mixed with Trichoderma asperellum on the growth and pythium root rot of lettuces. Int J GEOMATE 17:215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yuvaraj A, Thangaraj R, Karmegam N, Ravindran B, Chang S (2021) Activation of biochar through exoenzymes prompted by earthworms for vermibiochar production: a viable resource recovery option for heavy metal contaminated soils and water. Chemosphere 278:130458

  40. Yuvaraj A, Govarthanan M, Karmegam N et al (2021) Metallothionein dependent-detoxification of heavy metals in the agricultural field soil of industrial area: earthworm as field experimental model system. Chemosphere 267:129240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Karwal M, Kaushik A (2020) Co-composting and vermicomposting of coal fly-ash with press mud: changes in nutrients, micro-nutrients and enzyme activities. Environ Technol Innov 18:100708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific research at Umm Al-Qura University, Grant/ Award Number: 19-SCI-1–03-0017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Jumum College University, Umm Al-Qura University, P.O Box 7388, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia

    Fatimah Alshehrei

  2. Department of Biology, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia

    Nouf M. Al-Enazi

  3. Department of Botany & Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia

    Fuad Ameen

Authors
  1. Fatimah Alshehrei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nouf M. Al-Enazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fuad Ameen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting, or revising the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript and are accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuad Ameen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshehrei, F., Al-Enazi, N.M. & Ameen, F. Vermicomposting amended with microalgal biomass and biochar produce phytopathogen-resistant seedbeds for vegetables. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01770-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01770-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation