Skip to main content
Log in

Gasoline pre-treated feedstock for the production of biodiesel with improved physicochemical properties

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study demonstrates that the gasoline can be used as a co-solvent towards the modification of feedstock such as waste cooking oil for the synthesis of biodiesel via transesterification reaction, where the gasoline is removed from the reaction solution after the treatment. Parametric studies including varying the amount of co-solvent with respect to the feedstock, methanol/oil molar ratio, catalyst amount, reaction temperature, time, and stirring speed have been conducted to optimize the experiment. Our results show that biodiesel with a yield of ~ 99.4% is achieved at optimized conditions viz. 10% v/v co-solvent with respect to the feedstock, 0.6 wt% catalyst concentration, 6:1 molar-ratio, 50 °C temperature, 40 min reaction time, and 350 rpm stirring speed, while it is ~ 82.3% without the addition of co-solvent in the reaction solution under the same conditions. The thermodynamic parameters such as frequency factor, activation-energy, enthalpy, and entropy of the system have been estimated to be 1.3 × 104 min−1, 34.04 kJ mol−1, 31.48 kJ mol−1, and − 0.17 kJ mol−1 k−1, respectively. Further, various properties of the biodiesel produced with and without the feedstock modification have also been quantitatively measured and the developed approach favoured the feedstock modification towards improving the biodiesel yield and its physicochemical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Yes.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Krishnamoorthy V, Dhanasekaran R, Rana D, Saravanan S, Rajesh Kumar B (2018) A comparative assessment of ternary blends of three bio-alcohols with waste cooking oil and diesel for optimum emissions and performance in a CI engine using response surface methodology. Energy Convers Manage 156:337–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akoh CC, Chang S, Lee G, Shaw J (2007) An enzymatic approach to biodiesel production. J Agric Food Chem 55:8995–9005. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf071724y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atabani AE, Silitonga AS, Ong HC, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Badruddin IA, Fayaz H (2013) Non-edible vegetable oils: a critical evaluation of oil extraction, fatty acid compositions, biodiesel production, characteristics, engine performance and emissions production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:211–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muppaneni T, Reddy HK, Ponnusamy S, Patil PD, Sun Y, Dailey P, Deng S (2013) Optimization of biodiesel production from palm oil under supercritical ethanol conditions using hexane as co-solvent: a response surface methodology approach. Fuel 107:630–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Puneet V, Sharma MP (2016) Review of process parameters for biodiesel production from different feedstocks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 262:1063–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar A, Sharma S (2011) Potential non-edible oil resources as biodiesel feedstock: an Indian perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1791–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Godson E, Vinoth E (2015) Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Int J Students’ Res Technol Manag 3:448–450. https://doi.org/10.18510/ijsrtm.2015.383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kulkarni MG, Dalai AK, Tobar M, Núñez GA, Taherkhani M, Sadrameli SM (2006) Waste cooking oil an economical source for biodiesel: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:2901–2913. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0510526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. da Silva Araújo FD, Araújo IC, Costa ICG, de Moura CVR, Araújo CMH, ECE, (2014) Study of degumming process and evaluation of oxidative stability of methyl and ethyl biodiesel of Jatropha curcas L. oil from three different Brazilian states. Renew Ener 71:495–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yatish KV, Lalithamba HS, Suresh R, Arun SB, Vinay KP (2016) Optimization of scum oil biodiesel production by using response surface methodology. Process Safe Environ Protect 102:667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yatish KV, Prakash RM, Ningaraju C, Sakar M, GeethaBalakrishna R, Lalithamba HS (2020) Terminalia chebula as a novel green source for the synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and as feedstock for biodiesel production and its application on diesel engine. Energy, 119165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119165

  12. Verma P, Sharma MP, Dwivedi G (2016) Impact of alcohol on biodiesel production and properties. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56:319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rashid U, Anwa F (2008) Production of biodiesel through optimized alkaline-catalysed transesterification of rapeseed oil. Fuel 87:265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leung DYC, Guo Y (2006) Transesterification of neat and used frying oil: optimization for biodiesel production. Fuel ProcesTechnol 87:883–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Niculescu R, Clenci A, Iorga-Siman V (2019) Review on the use of diesel–biodiesel–alcohol blends in compression ignition engines. Energies 12:1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12071194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee DW, Park YM, Lee KY (2009) Heterogeneous base catalysts for transesterification in biodiesel synthesis. Catal Surv Asia 13:63–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10563-009-9068-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guan G, Kusakabe K, Sakurai N, Moriyama K (2009) Transesterification of vegetable oil to biodiesel fuel using acid catalysts in the presence of dimethyl ether. Fuel 88:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh V, MeenaYadav YC, Sharma, (2017) Effect of co-solvent on biodiesel production using calcium aluminium oxide as a reusable catalyst and waste vegetable oil. Fuel 20:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guan G, Sakurai N, Kusakabe K (2009) Synthesis of biodiesel from sunflower oil at room temperature in the presence of various co-solvents. Chem Eng J 46:302–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ataya F, Dube MA, Ternan M (2006) Single-phase and two-phase base-catalyzed transesterification of canola oil to fatty acid methyl esters at ambient conditions. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:5411–5417. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie060152o

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guoqing G, Nozomi S, Katsuki K (2009) Synthesis of biodiesel from sunflower oil at room temperature in the presence of various co-solvents. Chem Eng J 146:302–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohd Y, Moin A (2015) Biodiesel production using hexane as co-solvent. J biofuel 6:88–91. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4763.2015.00013.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thanh TL, Okitsu K, Sadanga Y, Takenaka N, Maeda Y, Bandow H (2013) A new co-solvent method for the green production of biodiesel fuel-optimization and practical application. Fuel 103:742–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed IE, Hamdy H, Latif I, Zhixia H, ManzooreElahi MS (2020) Combustion, emission, and phase stability features of a diesel engine fueled by Jatropha/ethanol blends and n-butanol as co-solvent. Inter J Green Energ 17:793–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2020.1798770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aso AH, Hayder AA, Joseph DS (2020) Using ethanol for continuous biodiesel production with trace catalyst and CO2 co-solvent. Fuel Process Technol 203:106377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Majid M, Babak A, Mahmoud M, Ahmadreza A (2020) Study of the transesterification of waste cooking oil for the production of biodiesel in a microreactor pilot: The effect of acetone as the co-solvent. Fuel 273:117736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ikbal BL, Tuhin D, Piyali B, Bappi P, Rajat G, Sushovan C (2020) Transesterification of soybean oil at room temperature using biowaste as catalyst; an experimental investigation on the effect of co-solvent on biodiesel yield. Renew Ener 162:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Martin H, Aleš V, Jáchym M (2020) Butanol as a co-solvent for transesterification of rapeseed oil by methanol under homogeneous and heterogeneous catalyst. Fuel 277:118239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maeda Y, Thanh LT, Imamura K, Izutani K, Okitsu K, Boi LV (2010) New technology for the production of biodiesel fuel. Green Chem 13:1124–1128. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1GC15049A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Luu PD, Takenaka N, Van Luu B, Pham LN, Imamura K, Maeda Y (2014) Co-solvent method produce biodiesel form waste cooking oil with small pilot plant. Energy Procedia 61:2822–2832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohadesi M, Aghel B, Maleki M, Ansari A (2020) Study of the transesterification of waste cooking oil for the production of biodiesel in a microreactor pilot: the effect of acetone as the co-solvent. Fuel 273:117736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Aghel B, Mohadesi M, Sahraei S (2018) Effect of different cosolvents on transesterification of waste cooking oil in a microreactor. Chemi Enginee Technol 41:598–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201700025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Canaksi M, Ozsezen AN, Alptekin E (2013) Impact of alcohol-gasoline fuel blends on exhaust emission on an SI engine. Renew Ener 52:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pikunas A, Pukalskas S, Grabys J (2003) Influence of composition of gasoline-ethanol blends on parameters of internal combustion engines. J KONES Inter Combus Engin 10:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  35. Varol Y, Oner C, Oztop HF, Altun S (2014) Comparison of methanol, ethanol, or n-butanol blending with unleaded gasoline on exhaust emissions of an SI engine. Ener Sourc Part A Recov Utiliza Environl Effec 36:938–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2011.572141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Iliev S (2015) A comparison of ethanol and methanol blending with gasoline using a 1-D engine model. Proce Engine 100:1013–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harsha Hebbar HR, Math MC, Yatish KV (2018) Optimization and kinetic study of CaO nano-particles catalyzed biodiesel production from Bombax ceiba oil. Energy 143:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Suraj CK, Anand K, Sundararajan T (2017) Investigation of biodiesel production methods by altering free fatty acid content in vegetable oils. Biofuel 11:587–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2017.1378993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pugazhendhi A, Alagumalai A, Mathimani T, Atabani AE (2020) Optimization, kinetic and thermodynamic studies on sustainable biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: An Indian perspective. Fuel 273:117725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Krishnamurthy KN, Sridhara SN, Ananda Kumar CS (2020) Optimization and kinetic study of biodiesel production from Hydnocarpus wightiana oil and dairy waste scum using snail shell CaO nano catalyst. Renew Ener 146:280–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang H, Zhou Q, Chang F, Pan H, Liu XF, Li H, Yang S (2015) Production and fuel properties of biodiesel from Firmiana platanifolia L.f. as a potential non-food oil source. Indus Crop Produ 76:768–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Abbaszaadeh A, Ghobadian B, Omidkhah MR, Najafi G (2012) Current biodiesel production technologies: a comparative review. Energy Convers Manage 63:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.02.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nichaonn C, Vittaya P (2017) Response surface methodology for biodiesel production using calcium methoxide catalyst assisted with tetrahydrofuran as cosolvent. J. Chemis ID 4190818. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4190818

  44. Fadhil AB, Abdulahad WS (2014) Transesterification of mustard (Brassica nigra) seedoil with ethanol: purification of the crude ethyl ester with activated carbon produced from de-oiled cake. Energy Convers Manage 77:495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Takase M, Zhang M, Feng W, Chen Y, Zhao T, Cobbina SJ (2014) Application of zirconia modified with KOH as heterogeneous solid base catalyst to new non-edible oil for biodiesel. Energy Convers Manage 80:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pena R, Romero R, Martínez SL, Ramos MJ, Martínez A, Martínez A (2009) Transesterification of castor oil: effect of catalyst and co-solvent. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:1186–1189. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie8005929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Alhassan Y, Kumar N, Bugaje IM, Pali HS, Kathkar P (2014) Co-solvents transesterification of cotton seed oil into biodiesel: effects of reaction conditions on quality of fatty acids methyl esters. Energy Convers Manage 84:640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Madhu D, Arora R, Sahani S, Singh V, Sharma YC (2017) Synthesis of high-quality biodiesel using feedstock and catalyst derived from fish wastes. J Agric Food Chem 65:2100–2109. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mbah GO, Onyiah MI, Amulu NF (2013) Effects of process parameters on biodiesel production from used soy oil. Int J Eng Res Sci Tech 2:46–60

    Google Scholar 

  50. Leung DYC, Wu X, Leung MKH (2010) A review on biodiesel production using catalysed transesterification. Appl Energy 87:1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Birla A, Singh B, Upadhyay SN, Sharma YC (2012) Kinetics studies of synthesis of biodiesel from waste frying oil using a heterogeneous catalyst derived from snail shell. Bioresour Technol 106:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mohammed-Dabo IA, Ahmad MS, Hamza A, Muazu K, Aliyu A (2012) Co-solvent transesterification of Jatrophacurcas seed oil. J Pet Technol Altern Fuels 3(4):42–51. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPTAF11.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Alhassan Y, Kumar N, Bugaje IM, Pali HS, Kathkar P (2014) Co-solvents transesterification of cotton seed oil into biodiesel: effects of reaction conditions on quality of fatty acids methyl esters. Ener Convers Manage 84:640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Casas A, Fernández CM, Ramos MJ, Pérez Á, Rodríguez JF (2010) Optimization of the reaction parameters for fast pseudo single-phase transesterification of sunflower oil. Fuel 89:650–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shalini S, Sushmita B, Sharma YC (2018) Study of ‘co-solvent effect’ on production of biodiesel from Schleichera Oleosa oil using a mixed metal oxide as a potential catalyst. J Taiw Inst Chemi Engine 86:42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Roschat W, Siritanon T, Kaewpuang T, Yoosuk B, Promarak V (2016) Economical and green biodiesel production process using river snail shells-derived heterogeneous catalyst and cosolvent method. Bioresour Technol 209:343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Encinar JM, Pardal A, Sánchez N (2015) An improvement to the transesterification process by the use of co-solvents to produce biodiesel. Fuel 166:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shwetharani R, Geetha Balakrishna R (2016) Efficient algal lipid extraction via photocatalysis and its conversion to biofuel. Appl Ener 168:364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. He BB, Van Gerpen JH, Thompson JC (2006) Sulfur content in selected oils and fats and their corresponding methyl esters. Appl Engine Agricul 25(2):223–226

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors sincerely acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology, (DST/SEED/SUTRA/2020/71(G)) and DST-Nanomission (SR/NM/NT-1073/2016(G)), Govt. of India for funding support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: C. Ningaraju, K. V. Yatish, M. Sakar; methodology: C. Ningaraju, K. V. Yatish; formal analysis and investigation: C. Ningaraju, K. V. Yatish, R. Mithun Prakash; writing–original draft preparation: C. Ningaraju, K. V. Yatish; writing–review and editing: M. Sakar, R. Geetha Balakrishna; funding acquisition: M. Sakar, R. Geetha Balakrishna; resources: R. Geetha Balakrishna; supervision: M. Sakar, R. Geetha Balakrishna.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. Sakar or R. Geetha Balakrishna.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed for the publication of this work.

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2046 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ningaraju, C., Yatish, K.V., Prakash, R.M. et al. Gasoline pre-treated feedstock for the production of biodiesel with improved physicochemical properties. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 8351–8360 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01992-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01992-y

Keywords

Navigation