Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interdisciplinary environmental education: elements of field identity and curriculum design

  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interdisciplinary environmental degree programs (environmental studies/science(s) and similar programs) in higher education in the U.S.A. are both diverse and dynamic in their curriculum designs. Though these characteristics afford flexibility and adaptability, they are also seen as weaknesses that can undermine programs’ perceived legitimacy both within and beyond their host institutions. The lack of a clear identity, definition of core competencies, and prescriptions for interdisciplinary pedagogy can create confusion among program stakeholders and skepticism among institutional administrators. To learn more about how interdisciplinary environmental curricula vary across the U.S.A., a national survey was conducted of program administrators to investigate their programs and identify their views of what an ideal curriculum would entail. The study demonstrates that consensus exists on field identity: an applied, interdisciplinary focus on the interface of coupled human-natural systems with a normative commitment to sustainability. The study also reveals that three ideal curricular models are espoused by these administrators: Systems Science, Policy and Governance, and Adaptive Management. Program attributes related to these models are also reported. We conclude the article with a brief description of how the three models are related to developing an interdisciplinary environmental workforce, describe the potential next steps for extending the study, and express our optimism that a consensus can be forged on core competencies guidelines and model-specific recommendations for curricular content related to three broad knowledge areas and two skill sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balsiger PW (2004) Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale. Futures 36(4):407–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry A, Born G, Wezkalnys G (2008) Logics of interdisciplinarity. Econ Soc 37(1):20–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek RH, Wendling RM, DiPerna P (2008) Environmental protection, the economy, and jobs: national and regional analyses. J Environ Manage 86:63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch OJH, King CA, Herbohn JL, Russell IW, Smith CS (2007) Getting the big picture in natural resource management—systems thinking as ‘method’ for scientists, policy makers and other stakeholders. Syst Res Behav Sci 24(2):217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand R, Karvonen A (2007) The ecosystem of expertise: complementary knowledges for sustainable development. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 3(1):21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark TW (2002) The policy process: a practical guide for natural resource professionals. Yale University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel J (2006) Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 2(2):14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Frodeman R, Thompson Klein J, Mitcham C (2009) The oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Godemann J (2008) Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation. Environ Educ Res 14(6):625–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann R (2009) Linking the components of a university program to the qualification profile of graduates: the case of a sustainability-oriented environmental science curriculum. J Res Sci Teach 46(5):537–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Reim H, Biber-Kleem S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye J, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Kemp E (2008) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes J, Clark R (2008) Enhancing the use of science in environmental policymaking and regulation. Environ Sci Policy 11(8):702–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Education for Sustainable Development Practice (2008) Report from the international commission on education for sustainable development practice. The Earth Institute at Columbia University. http://www.wfeo.org/documents/download/ICESDP%20Final%20Report%202008.pdf Accessed 1 September 2010

  • Jacobs JA, Frickel S (2009) Interdisciplinarity: a critical assessment. Annu Rev Sociology 35(1):43–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jǿrgensen U, Lauridsen EH (2005) Environmental professional competences: the role of communities of practice and spaces for reflexive learning. Green Manag Int 49:57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3(2):215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengwiler M (2006) Between charisma and heuristics: four styles of interdisciplinarity. Sci Public Policy 33(6):423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279(5350):491–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Brannigan J, Hall A (2005) Sustainability, systems thinking and professional practice. J Geogr High Educ 29(1):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, M, Cacciola K, Clermont S, Keniry J (2009) State of the campus environment: a national report card on environmental performance and sustainability in higher education. National Wildlife Federation, Reston VA http://www.nwf.org/Global-Warming/Campus-Solutions/Resources/Reports/State-of-the-Campus-Environment-Report/Read-the-State-of-the-Campus-Environment-Report.aspx Accessed 1 September 2010

  • National Science Foundation AC-ERE (2005) Complex environmental system: pathways to the future. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation AC-ERE (2009) Transitions and tipping points in complex environmental systems. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman P (2005) Can the magic of sustainability revive environmental professionalism? Green Manag Int 49:11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfirman SL, the AC-ERE (2003) Complex environmental systems: synthesis for earth, life, and society in the 21st century: a report summarizing a ten-year outlook in environmental research and education for the national science foundation. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C (2008) From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environ Sci Policy 11(1):46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polk M, Knutsson P (2008) Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development. Environ Educ Res 14(6):643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar H, Driessen P, Vermeulen W (2005) Policy competences of environmental sustainability professionals. Green Manag Int 49:25–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar H, Dieperink C, Driessen P (2006) Policy analysis for sustainable development: the toolbox for the environmental social scientist. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(1):34–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Labor (2010) Occupational outlook handbook, 2010–11 Edition. http://www.bls.gov/oco/ Accessed 1 September 2010

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Administration and Resource Management (1999) Workforce assessment project: executive summary and tasks 1–4 Final Reports. http://www.epa.gov/epahrist/workforce/wap.pdf Accessed 1 September 2010

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development (2007) Sustainability research strategy. http://www.epa.gov/Sustainability/pdfs/EPA-12057_SRS_R4-1.pdf Accessed 1 September 2010

  • van Kerkhoff L (2005) Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy 8(5):452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent S (2010a) Interdisciplinary environmental education on the nation's campuses: elements of field identity and curriculum design. National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent S (2010b) A search for identity: exploring core competencies for interdisciplinary environmental programs, Dissertation, Oklahoma State University

  • Vincent S, Focht W (2009) U.S. higher education environmental program managers' perspectives on curriculum design and core competencies: implications for sustainability as a guiding framework. Int J Sustain High Educ 10(2):164–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent S, Focht W (2010) In search of common ground: exploring identity and the possibility of core competencies for interdisciplinary environmental programs. Environ Pract 12(1):76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Walter AI (2009) A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems. Eur J Oper Res 197(1):360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirley Vincent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vincent, S., Focht, W. Interdisciplinary environmental education: elements of field identity and curriculum design. J Environ Stud Sci 1, 14–35 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0007-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0007-2

Keywords

Navigation