Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling-based performance evaluation of novel cascade cum trickling filter wastewater treatment system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimization of operational parameters of wastewater treatment system using the modeling technique may lead to enhance the system’s operational and treatment efficiency. The present research was carried out to investigate the treatment efficiency of conventional trickling filter (CTF) and cascade cum trickling filter (CCTF) for treatment of domestic wastewater. Both the systems (CTF and CCTF) were operated for a period of four months under temperature range of 21–48 °C. The maize cob (MC) and date palm fibre (DPF) were used as biofilm support media. Biological oxygen demand (BOD) reaction kinetic model was developed and evaluated for optimization of BOD removing efficiency of CTF and CCTF. The removing efficiency of CTF and CCTF has increased with increasing operational time from 12 to 48 h. The CCTF showed 3–25% higher efficiency in removing organic matter, nutrients and sulphates compared to CTF regardless the supporting media. Similarly, MC showed 3–8% higher removal efficiency of the tested parameters compared to the DPF as supporting media in both CTF and CCTF systems. The BOD reaction kinetic model estimated the optimal volumetric design BOD loading rates (Bvd) of 1.5–2.1 kg BOD/m3 day for designing efficient trickling filter systems. The CCTF with MC media was found efficient than other reactors due to highest BOD removal efficiency (91.8%) and good capacity to treat high BOD load (2.1 kg/m3.day). Hence, the CCTF system has higher potential for efficient removal of organic and inorganic contaminants from the wastewater in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbood DW, Mustafa AS, Joudah RA (2013) Modification of grey water treatment using combination of cascade aeration and biofiltration. J Environ Sci Eng B 2:473–481

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn YM, Wi J, Park JK, Higuchi S, Lee NH (2014) Effects of Pre-aeration on the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Environ Eng Res 19(1):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Amshawee S, Yunus MYBM, Vo DVN, Tran NH (2020) Biocarriers for biofilm immobilization in wastewater treatments: a review. Environ Chem Letters 18:1–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albertson OE, Okey RW, Pearce P, Parker DS (2001) Trickling Filter Mythology. J Environ Eng 127(1):83–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali I, Khan ZM, Sultan M, Mahmood MH, Farid HU, Ali M, Nasir A (2016) Experimental study on Maize Cob trickling filter-based wastewater treatment system: design, development, and performance evaluation. Pol J Environ Stud 25(6):2265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali I, Khan ZM, Peng C, Naz I, Sultan M, Ali M, Mahmood MH, Niaz Y (2017) Identification and elucidation of the designing and operational issues of trickling filter systems for wastewater treatment. Pol J Environ Stud 26(6):2431–2444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aly OHI, Daif SA (2015) Performance of Organic overloaded WWTP comprise primary followed by secondary attached growth biological treatment-case study. Corpus ID: 212480171

  • Andersson S (2009) Characterization of bacterial biofilms for wastewater treatment (Doctoral dissertation). Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonie RL (2018) Fixed biological surfaces-wastewater treatment: the rotating biological contactor. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation

  • Asadi A, Zinatizadeh AA, Van Loosdrecht M, Younesi H (2016) Nitrogen removal by ANAMMOX and simultaneous nitrification–denitrification (SND) processes in a novel single airlift bioreactor. Rsc Advan 6(78):74367–74371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam MMA, Khan ZM, Sultan M, Niaz Y, Mahmood MH, Shoaib M, Shakoor A, Ahmad M (2017) Performance evaluation of trickling filter-based wastewater treatment system utilizing cotton sticks as filter media. Pol J Environ Stud 26(5):1955–1962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai L, Wang C, Huang C, He L, Pei Y (2014) Reuse of drinking water treatment residuals as a substrate in constructed wetlands for sewage tertiary treatment. Ecolog Eng 70:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WH, Yang WB, Yuan CS, Yang JC, Zhao QL (2013) Influences of aeration and biological treatment on the fates of aromatic VOCs in wastewater treatment processes. Aerosol Air Qual Res 13(1):225–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doan H, Lohi A (2009) Intermittent aeration in biological treatment of wastewater. Am J Eng Appl Sci 2(2):260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong H, Qiang Z, Li T, Jin H, Chen W (2012) Effect of artificial aeration on the performance of vertical-flow constructed wetland treating heavily polluted river water. J Environ Sci 24(4):596–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Monayeri DS, Atta NN, El Mokadem S, Aboul-Fotoh AM (2007) Effect of organic loading rate and temperature on the performance of horizontal biofilters. In: Proceedings of eleventh international water technology conference, IWTC11, pp 671–682

  • Emiroglu ME, Baylar A (2003) Study of aeration performance of open channel chutes equipped with a flip bucket. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 27(3):189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteves BM, Rodrigues CS, Maldonado-Hódar FJ, Madeira LM (2019) Treatment of high-strength olive mill wastewater by combined Fenton-like oxidation and coagulation/flocculation. J Environ Chem Eng 7(4):103252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henze M, Loosdrecht M, CMv, Ekama G A, Brdjanovic D, (2008) Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modelling and design. IWA publishing, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joannis C, Delia ML, Riba JP (1998) Comparison of four methods for quantification of biofilms in biphasic cultures. Biotechnol Tech 12:777–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanwar RMA, Khan ZM, Farid HU (2019) Development and adoption of wastewater treatment system for peri-urban agriculture in Multan. Pakistan Water Sci Technol 80(8):1524–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan AA, Gaur RZ, Lew B, Mehrotra I, Kazmi AA (2010) Effect of aeration on the quality of effluent from UASB reactor treating sewage. J Environ Eng 137(6):464–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan ZM, Asif Kanwar RM, Farid HU, Sultan M, Arsalan M, Ahmad M, Shakoor A, Ahson Aslam MM (2019) Wastewater evaluation for Multan, Pakistan: characterization and agricultural reuse. Pol J Environ Stud 28(4):2638–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch A (1984) Turbidity measurements in microbiology. ASM News 50:473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornaros M, Lyberatos G (2006) Biological treatment of wastewaters from a dye manufacturing company using a trickling filter. J Hazard Mater 136(1):95–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krumins V, Line M, Wheaton F (2000) Fluid velocity distribution in nitrifying trickling filters: Mathematical model and NMR calibration. Water Res 34(8):2337–2345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kummar ACB, Andrade L, Gomes SD, Fazolo A, Hassan SDM, Machado F (2011) Tratamento de effluente de abatedouro de tilapia com adicao de manipueira na face anoxica. Engenharia Agricola 31:567–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Leick SA, Oliveira JGBD, Tavares KA, Lopes DD, Barana AC (2017) Effect of aeration and recirculation in the removal of nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand from sanitary sewage in a structured bed reactor. Engenharia Agrícola 37(6):1236–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leefmann T, Heim C, Lausmaa J, Sjövall P, Ionescu D, Reitner J (2011) Imaging mass spectrometry in the study of biofilm formation in a subsurface environment. In: Geophysical research abstracts, vol 13, EGU 2011-8415-1

  • Liu B, Jarvis I, Ren H, Quang CND, Terashima M, Yasui H (2016) Biofilm Modelling and Kinetics in a Trickling Filter Process. J Water Environ Technol 14(3):200–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manem JA, Rittmann BE (1990) Scaling procedure for biofilm processes. Water Sci Technol 22(1–2):329–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin I, Pidou M, Soares A, Judd S, Jefferson B (2011) Modelling the energy demands of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 32(9):921–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf & Eddy (2013) Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, and reuse. McGraw-Hill Science

  • Miller-Robbie L, Ramaswami A, Amerasinghe P (2017) Wastewater treatment and reuse in urban agriculture: exploring the food, energy, water, and health nexus in Hyderabad, India. Environ Res Letters 12(7):075005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naniek RJA, Laksmono R, Rosariawari F, Chandra E (2016) Domestic wastewater treatment miniplan of institution using a combination of “Conetray Cascade Aerator” technology and biofilter. In: MATEC web of conferences 58, EDP Sciences, p 04002

  • Naz I, Seher S, Perveen I, Saroj DP, Ahmed S (2015b) Physiological activities associated with biofilm growth in attached and suspended growth bioreactors under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Environ Technol 36(13):1657–1671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naz I, Saroj DP, Mumtaz S, Ali N, Ahmed S (2015a) Assessment of biological trickling filter systems with various packing materials for improved wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 36(4):424–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nourmohammadi D, Esmaeeli MB, Akbarian H, Ghasemian M (2013) Nitrogen removal in a full-scale domestic wastewater treatment plant with activated sludge and trickling filter. J Environ Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/504705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oon YL, Ong SA, Ho LN, Wong YS, Dahalan FA, Oon YS, Lehl HK, Thung WE, Nordin N (2017) Role of macrophyte and effect of supplementary aeration in up-flow constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell for simultaneous wastewater treatment and energy recovery. Biores Technol 224:265–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Sarkar U, Dasgupta D (2010) Dynamic simulation of secondary treatment processes using trickling filters in a sewage treatment works in Howrah, west Bengal. India Desal 253(1–3):135–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park H, Park HJ, Kim JA, Lee SH, Kim JH, Yoon J, Park TH (2011) Inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 biofilms by hyperthermia using superparamagnetic nanoparticles. J Microbiol Methods 84(1):41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen AR, Arvin E (1997) Toluene removal in a biofilm reactor for waste gas treatment. Water Sci Technol 36(1):69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasool T, Rehman A, Naz I, Ullah R, Ahmed S (2018) Efficiency of a locally designed pilot-scale trickling biofilter (TBF) system in natural environment for the treatment of domestic wastewater. Environ Technol 39(10):1295–1306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakuma T, Jinsiriwanit S, Hattori T, Deshusses MA (2008) Removal of ammonia from contaminated air in a biotrickling filter–denitrifying bioreactor combination system. Water Res 42(17):4507–4513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Séguret F, Racault Y, Sardin M (2000) Hydrodynamic behaviour of full scale trickling filters. Water Res 34(5):1551–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Dai X, Liu Y, Peng L, Ni BJ (2017) Sulfide removal and sulfur production in a membrane aerated biofilm reactor: model evaluation. Chem Eng J 309:454–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vayenas DV, Lyberatos G (1995) On the Design of Nitrifying Trickling Filters for Potable Water Treatment. Wat Res 29(5):1079–1084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velz CJ (1948) A Basic Law for the Performance of Biological Filter. Sewage Works J 20:607–617

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei D, Shi L, Yan T, Zhang G, Wang Y, Du B (2014) Aerobic granules formation and simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal treating high strength ammonia wastewater in sequencing batch reactor. Biores Technol 171:211–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wik T (2003) Trickling filters and biofilm reactor modelling. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2(2–4):193–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Lukowicz R, Merchant S, Valquier-Flynn H, Caballero J, Sandoval J, Okuom M, Huber C, Brooks TD, Wilson E, Clement B (2017) Quantitative and qualitative assessment methods for biofilm growth: a mini-review. Research and reviews. J Eng Technol 6(4). PMID: 30214915; PMCID: PMC6133255

  • Yamashita T, Yamamoto-Ikemoto R (2014) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from wastewater treatment plant effluent via bacterial sulfate reduction in an anoxic bioreactor packed with wood and iron. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(9):9835–9853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yücel M, Galand PE, Fagervold SK, Contreira-Pereira L, Le Bris N (2013) Sulfide production and consumption in degrading wood in the marine environment. Chemosphere 90(2):403–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Cheng Y, Yang C, Luo W, Zeng G, Lu L (2015) Performance of system consisting of vertical flow trickling filter and horizontal flow multi-soil-layering reactor for treatment of rural wastewater. Biores Technol 193:424–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Rothermel B (2014) Everything you need to know about trickling filters. Clear Waters 44(2):16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieliński M, Zielińska M, Dębowski M (2013) Application of microwave radiation to biofilm heating during wastewater treatment in trickling filters. Biores Technol 127:223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zitomer DH, Shrout JD (2000) High-sulfate, high-chemical oxygen demand wastewater treatment using aerated methanogenic fluidized beds. Water Environ Res 72(1):90–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan under research project titled: ‘Development and Adoption of Wastewater Treatment Technologies for Safe Re-Use of Municipal Wastewater and Associated Bio-Solids in Multan region’.

Author information

Author notes

  1. R. M. A. Kanwar, Z. M. Khan and H. U. Farid are contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan

    R. M. A. Kanwar, Z. M. Khan & H. U. Farid

Authors
  1. R. M. A. Kanwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Z. M. Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. U. Farid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. M. A. Kanwar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by Samareh Mirkia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanwar, R.M.A., Khan, Z.M. & Farid, H.U. Modeling-based performance evaluation of novel cascade cum trickling filter wastewater treatment system. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 5015–5028 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03455-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03455-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation