Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Bacillus subtilis Strain CKT1 as Inoculum on Growth of Tomato Seedlings Under Net House Conditions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is steadily increasing in agriculture and offers an attractive way to replace chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and supplements. The authors have isolated and characterized different PGPRs from the rhizosphere soils/roots of tomato with multiple plant growth promoting activities. Subsequently, to investigate the effects of PGPR isolates on the growth of tomato, a pot culture experiment was conducted under net house. Most of the isolates resulted in a significant increase in shoot length, root length and dry matter production of shoot and root of tomato seedlings. Among eleven isolates, N11 exhibited concomitant production of all plant growth promoting activities viz., phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, indole-acetic acid production including hydrogen cyanide production. Remarkable increase was observed in seed germination (36.08 %), shoot length (5.22 %), root length (21.12 %), shoot dry weight (63.50 %) and root dry weight (54.08 %), nitrogen (18.75 %), potassium (57.69 %) and phosphorus (22.22 %). Morphological, biochemical and 16S rRNA gene analysis identified strain N11 as Bacillus subtilis strain CKT1. The present study, therefore, suggests that the use of single strain inoculum of CKT1 with multiple plant growth promoting activities offers a recent concept to address multiple mode of action by combined use of multi-strain inoculum of PGPR with each having specific capability and function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kloepper JW, Lifshitz R, Zablotowicz RM (1989) Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trends Biotechnol 7:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Herman MAB, Nault BA, Smart CD (2008) Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on bell pepper production and green peach aphid infestations in New York. Crop Prot 27:996–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashrafuzzaman M, Akhtar HF, Ismail Razi M, Hoque M, Anamul ZI, Shahidullah MS (2009) Efficiency of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for the enhancement of rice growth. Afr J Biotechnol 8(7):1247–1252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kloepper JW, Rodriguez Ubana R, Zehnder GW, Murphy JF, Sikora E, Fernadez C (1999) Plant root bacterial interactions in biological control of soil borne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Australas Plant Pathol 28(1):21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubeikovsky AN, Mordeekhora EA, Kochetkov VV, Polikarpova FY, Boronin AM (1993) Growth promotion of blackcurrant softwood cuttings by recombinant strain Pseudomonas fluorescens BSP53a synthesizing an increased amount of indole-3-acetic acid. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1277–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (1998) Plant growth-regulating substances in the rhizosphere: microbial production and functions. Adv Agron 62:45–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raaska L, Viikari L, Mattila-Sandholm T (1993) Detection of siderophores in growing cultures of Pseudomonas sp. J Ind Microbiol 11:181–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schinder U, Blumer C, Troxler J, Defago G, Haas D (1994) Overproduction of the antibiotics 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol and pyoluteorin in Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHAO. In: Ryder, Stephens and Bowen (eds) Improving plant productivity with rhizosphere bacteria, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, p 120

  9. Glick BR, Jacobson CB, Schwarze MMK, Pasternak JJ (1994) 1-Aminocyclopropane1- carboxylate deaminase mutants of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas putida GR 12-2 do not stimulate canola root elongation. Can J Microbiol 40:911–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pikovskaya RI (1948) Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with the vital activity of some microbial species. Microbiology 7:362–370

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shishido MC, Breuil P, Christopher C (1999) Endophytic colonization of spruce by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 29:191–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sundra Rao WVB, Sinha MK (1963) Phosphate dissolving microorganisms in the soil and rhizosphere. Indian J Agric Sci 33:272–278

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bernhard S, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon SA, Paleg LG (1957) Quantitative measurement of indole acetic acid. Physiol Plant 10:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Warnock DW (1989) Methods with antifungal drugs. In: Evans EGV, Richardson MD (eds) Medical mycology—a pratical approach. IEL Press, Oxford, pp 235–259

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vincent JM (1947) Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature 150:850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baker S (1987) Microbial cyanide production in the rhizosphere in relation to potato yield reduction and Pseudomonas sp. mediated plant growth stimulation. Soil Biol Biochem 19:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdul Babi AA, Anderson JD (1973) Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci 13:630–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneathm PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST (1994) Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th edn. Williams and Williams, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  20. Higgins D, Thompson J, Gibson T, Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Page RDM (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357–358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehta P, Chauhan A, Mahajan R, Mahajan PK, Shirkot CK (2010) Strain of Bacillus circulans isolated from apple rhizosphere showing plant growth promoting potential. Curr Sci 98:538–542

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar P, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK (2012) Bacillus strains isolated from rhizosphere showed plant growth promoting and antagonistic activity against phytopathogens. Microbiol Res 167:493–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodriguez H, Fraga R, Gonzalez T, Bashan Y (2006) Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving plant—growth promoting bacteria. Plant Soil 287:15–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pankaj T, Sa T (2008) Pseudomonas corrugate (NRRLB-30409) mutants increased phosphate solubilization, organic acid production, plant growth at lower temperature. Curr Micobiol 56:140–144

    Google Scholar 

  26. Anith KN, Tilak KVBR, Manmohandas TP (1999) Analysis of mutation affecting antifungal property of a fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. during cotton-rhizoctonia interaction. Indian Phytopathol 52:366–369

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khalid A, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2004) Screening of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J Appl Microbiol 96:473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown AE, Hamilton JTG (1993) Indole-3-ethanol produced by Zygorrhynchus moelleri, and indole-3-acetic acid analogue with antifungal activity. Mycol Res 96:71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kundu BS, Gera R, Sharma N, Bhatia A, Sharma R (2002) Host specificity of phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Indian J Microbiol 42:19–21

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shirkot CK, Sharma N (2005) Growth promotion of apple seedlings by plant growth promoting rhizobacterium (B. megaterium). Acta Hortic 696:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  31. Blumer C, Hass D (2000) Mechanism, regulation and ecological role of bacterial cyanide biosynthesis. Archae Microbiol 173:170–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Selvakumar G, Kundu S, Gupta Anand D, Shouche Yogesh S, Gupta Hari S (2008) Isolation and characterization of nonrhizobial plant growth promoting bacteria from nodules of Kudzu (Pueraria thunbergiana) and their effect on wheat seedling growth. Curr Microbiol 56:134–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar D, Shivay YS, Dhar S, Kumar C, Prasad R (2013) Rhizospheric flora and the influence of agronomic practices on them—a review. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 83(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alstrom S, Burns RG (1989) Cyanide production by rhizobacteria as a possible mechanism of plant growth inhibition. Biol Fertil Soils 7:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jagadeesh KS, Krishnaraj PU, Kulkarni JH (2006) Suppression of deleterious bacteria by rhizobacteria and subsequent improvement of germination and growth of tomato seedlings. Curr Sci 91:1458–1459

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. K. Shirkot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walia, A., Mehta, P., Chauhan, A. et al. Effect of Bacillus subtilis Strain CKT1 as Inoculum on Growth of Tomato Seedlings Under Net House Conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 84, 145–155 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0189-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0189-3

Keywords

Navigation