Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Study on Factors Affecting the Manual Material Handling Capacity of Indian Male Construction Workers

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction is one of the most hazardous industries involving high manual labour where health and safety risks are plentiful. This study focuses on evaluating the factors affecting the material lifting capacity of Indian male construction workers. A statistical experiment was conducted on selected male construction workers, and ANOVA technique was used to analyse the influence of parameters (like age, body mass index (BMI), material lifting height and lifting frequency) on maximum allowable weight limit (MAWL). From the analysis, maximum allowable weight limit (MAWL) and minimum lifting weight were determined for every worker based on his age and BMI corresponding to three different lift frequencies and lifting heights. The results indicate that for all BMI categories, the MAWL increases with the increase in the age of workers to a certain extent, but it decreases as the age increases. Using the maximum and minimum lifting weight values obtained, it will be easy to assign manual lifting tasks for workers without compromising their health at the same time ensuring optimum utilization of their efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abadi, A.S.S., Mazlomi, A., Saraji, G.N., Zeraati, H., Hadian, M.R., Jafari, A.H., 2015. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran. Electron. physician. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14661/2015.1365

  2. H.M. Al-Humaidi, F.H. Tan, Construction safety in Kuwait. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alavinia, S.M., Van Den Berg, T.I.J., Van Duivenbooden, C., Elders, L.A.M., Burdorf, A., 2009. Impact of work-related factors, lifestyle, and work ability on sickness absence among Dutch construction workers. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Heal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1340

  4. Arndt, V., Rothenbacher, D., Daniel, U., Zschenderlein, B., Schuberth, S., Brenner, H., 2005. Construction work and risk of occupational disability: a 10 year follow up of 14,474 male workers. Occup. Environ. Med. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.018135

  5. Boschman, J.S., Frings-Dresen, M.H.W., Van Der Molen, H.F., 2015. Use of ergonomic measures related to musculoskeletal complaints among construction workers: a 2-year follow-up study. Saf. Health Work. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.12.003

  6. Cal/OSHA Consultation Service- Research and Education Unit -Division of Occupational Safety and Health, 2007. Ergonomic guidelines for manual material handling. Natl. Inst. Occup. Saf. Heal

  7. Ciriello, V.M., Snook, S.H., Hashemi, L., Cotnam, J., 1999. Distributions of manual materials handling task parameters. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00005-0

  8. Dale, A.M., Jaegers, L., Buchholz, B., Welch, L., Evanoff, B.A., 2012. Using process evaluation to determine effectiveness of participatory ergonomics training interventions in construction, in: Work. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0684-3824

  9. K. Devi, Status of female workers in construction industry in india: a review. IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 14, 27–30 (2013). https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-1442730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eaves, S., Gyi, D.E., Gibb, A.G.F., 2016. Building healthy construction workers: Their views on health, wellbeing and better workplace design. Appl. Ergon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.004

  11. D. Fang, C. Wu, H. Wu, Impact of the supervisor on worker safety behavior in construction projects. J. Manag. Eng. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Genaidy, A.M., Asfour, S.S., Mital, A., Waly, S.M., 1990. Psychophysical models for manual lifting tasks. Appl. Ergon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(90)90200-H

  13. Gurav, R.B., Kartikeyan, S., Wayal, R., Joshi, S.D., 2005. Assessment of health profile of daily wage labourers. Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med.

  14. Harari, Y., Riemer, R., Bechar, A., 2018. Factors determining workers’ pace while conducting continuous sequential lifting, carrying, and lowering tasks. Appl. Ergon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.09.003

  15. S. Kanchana, P. Sivaprakash, S. Joseph, Studies on labour safety in construction sites. World J. Sci (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/590810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kramer, D.M., Bigelow, P.L., Carlan, N., Wells, R.P., Garritano, E., Vi, P., Plawinski, M., 2010. Searching for needles in a haystack: Identifying innovations to prevent MSDs in the construction sector. Appl. Ergon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.003

  17. Kulkarni, G., 2009. Construction industry: More needs to be done. Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5278.32455

  18. K.W. Li, C.L. Lee, Postural analysis of four jobs on two building construction sites: an experience of using the OWAS method in Taiwan. J. Occup. Health. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.41.183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, K.W., Yu, R. feng, Gao, Y., Maikala, R. V., Tsai, H.H., 2009. Physiological and perceptual responses in male Chinese workers performing combined manual materials handling tasks. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.08.004

  20. Maiti, R., Ray, G.G., 2004. Determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift by adult Indian female workers. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2004.06.003

  21. MJ, E., EU, A., NM, P., 2017. Impact of workplace environment on health workers. Occup. Med. Heal. Aff. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6879.1000301

  22. Mohammadi, A., Tavakolan, M., Khosravi, Y., 2018. Factors influencing safety performance on construction projects: a review. Saf. Sci. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.017

  23. Mohseni, P.H., Farshad, A.A., Mirkazemi, R., Orak, R.J., 2015. Assessment of the living and workplace health and safety conditions of site-resident construction workers in Tehran, Iran. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1096061

  24. Nirmala, C.J., Prasad, S.D., 2019. Occupational hazards and public health concerns of migrant construction workers: an epidemiological study in southern India. Int. J. Community Med. Public Heal. 6, 818. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20190214

  25. S. Safari, J. Akbari, M. Kazemi, M.A. Mououdi, B. Mahaki, Personnel’s health surveillance at work: Effect of age, body mass index, and shift work on mental workload and work ability index. J. Environ. Public Health. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/289498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S.P. Schneider, Musculoskeletal injuries in construction: a review of the literature. Occup. Environ. Hyg Appl. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/104732201753214161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh, J., Kalra, P., Walia, R.S., 2012. Study of maximum acceptable weight of lift for Indian male industrial workers. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol.

  28. Snook, S.H., 1978. The ergonomics society the society’s lecture 1978. The design of manual handling tasks. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137808931804

  29. Stattin, M., Järvholm, B., 2005. Occupation, work environment, and disability pension: a prospective study of construction workers. Scand. J. Public Health. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14034940410019208

  30. Taimela, S., Läärä, E., Malmivaara, A., Tiekso, J., Sintonen, H., Justén, S., Aro, T., 2007. Self-reported health problems and sickness absence in different age groups predominantly engaged in physical work. Occup. Environ. Med. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2006.027789

  31. Tam, N. Van, Huong, N.L., Ngoc, N.B., 2018. Factors affecting labour productivity of construction worker on construction site: a case of Hanoi. J. Sci. Technol. Civ. Eng.—Nuce. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31814/stce.nuce2018-12(5)-13

  32. J. Theurel, K. Desbrosses, T. Roux, A. Savescu, Physiological consequences of using an upper limb exoskeleton during manual handling tasks. Ergon. Appl (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. G. Tiwary, P.K. Gangopadhyay, A review on the occupational health and social security of unorganized workers in the construction industry. Occup. Environ. Med Indian J (2011). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5278.83003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. N. Ulutasdemir, M. Kilic, Ö. Zeki, F. Begendi, Effects of occupational health and safety on healthy lifestyle behaviors of workers employed in a private company in Turkey. Glob. Heal. Ann. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J.H.F. van Heerden, I. Musonda, C.S. Okoro, Health and safety implementation motivators in the South African construction industry. Cogent Eng. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1446253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. T.R. Waters, V. Putz-Anderson, A. Garg, L.J. Fine, Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Y. Yu, X. Yang, H. Li, X. Luo, H. Guo, Q. Fang, Joint-level vision-based ergonomic assessment tool for construction workers. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001647

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamilnadu, India

    Prasanna Venkatesan Ramani

  2. Larsen and Toubro Construction, Chennai, 600089, Tamilnadu, India

    Shubha Bhapkar

Authors
  1. Prasanna Venkatesan Ramani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shubha Bhapkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasanna Venkatesan Ramani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramani, P.V., Bhapkar, S. A Study on Factors Affecting the Manual Material Handling Capacity of Indian Male Construction Workers. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 102, 389–402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-021-00519-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-021-00519-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation