Skip to main content
Log in

Dose-Dependent Teratology in Humans: Clinical Implications for Prevention

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the inception of clinical teratology, the vast majority of scientific work has focused on identification of drugs and environmental agents causing malformations in humans as a dichotomous variable (i.e. yes or no), as well as the relative and absolute risks of such occurrences. Generally, the dose dependency of such events has not been investigated. With the establishment of large pregnancy databases, dose-dependence relationships are being uncovered for increasing numbers of medications, including valproic acid, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, lamotrigine, topiramate, and lithium. In this review we discuss newly recognized dose-dependent human teratogens and the implications to counseling and clinical management of pregnant women. The option of limiting the dose below a teratogenic threshold for women who may need these drugs may be important in managing such pregnancies. Similarly, in women that were exposed before they realized they had conceived, this new knowledge may lead to significant improvement in risk assessment. A common denominator of all studies calculating dose-dependent teratogenicity in humans is their use of total daily drug dose. None of these studies have standardized their calculations for women’s body weight. It is quite possible that the teratogenic dose threshold may be below the clinically effective dose levels for specific women, and hence such information needs to be considered and applied individually. With large administrative databases now reporting on drug safety in pregnancy, more accurate data will likely emerge on dose dependency of human teratogens, and these will likely increase the accuracy of risk assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen LS, Friedman JM, Jefferson JW, et al. A reevaluation of risk of in utero exposure to lithium. JAMA. 1994;271:146–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yacobi S, Ornoy A. Is lithium a real teratogen? What can we conclude from the prospective versus retrospective studies? A review. Isr J Psych Rel Dis. 2008;45:95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Patorno E, Huybrechts KF, Bateman BT, et al. Lithium use in pregnancy and the risk of cardiac malformations. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2245–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smithberg M, Dixit PK. Teratogenic effects of lithium in mice. Teratology. 1982;26:239–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, et al. EURAP study group. Dose-dependent risk of malformations with antiepileptic drugs: an analysis of data from the EURAP epilepsy and pregnancy registry. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:609–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, et al. Dose-dependent teratogenicity of valproate in mono- and polytherapy: an observational study. Neurology. 2015;85(10):866–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vajda FJ, Hitchcock A, Graham J, et al. Foetal malformations and seizure control: 52 months data of the Australian Pregnancy Registry. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:645–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mawer G, Clayton-Smith J, Coyle H, et al. Outcome of pregnancy in women attending an outpatient epilepsy clinic: adverse features associated with higher doses of sodium valproate. Seizures. 2002;11:512–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weston J, Bromley R, Jackson CF, et al. Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD010224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diav-Citrin O, Shechtman S, Bar-Oz B, et al. Pregnancy outcome after in utero exposure to valproate: evidence of dose relationship in teratogenic effect. CNS Drugs. 2008;22:325–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas SV, Jose M, Divakaran S, et al. Malformation risk of antiepileptic drug exposure during pregnancy in women with epilepsy: results from a pregnancy registry in South India. Epilepsia. 2017;58:274–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bromley RL, Mawer GE, Briggs M, et al. The prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders in children prenatally exposed to antiepileptic drugs. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:637–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vajda FJ, O’Brien TJ, Lander CM, et al. The teratogenicity of the newer antiepileptic drugs—an update. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;130:234–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hernandez-Diaz S, Huybrechts KF, Desai RJ, et al. Topiramate use early in pregnancy and the risk of oral clefts: a pregnancy cohort study. Neurology. 2018;90(4):e342–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morrow J, Russell A, Guthrie E, et al. Malformation risk of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy: a prospective study from the UK epilepsy and pregnancy register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2006;77:193–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Menegola E, Broccia ML, Nau H, et al. Teratogenic effects of sodium valproate in mice and rats at midgestation and at term. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 1996;16:97–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elshama SS, Osman HE, El-Kenawy A-M. Teratogenic effect of carbamazepine use during pregnancy in the mice. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2015;28:201–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SH, Lee IC, Baek HS, et al. Dose-response effects of diphenylhydantoin on pregnant dams and embryo-fetal development in rats. Birth Defects Res B. 2012;95:337–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Manent JB, Jorquera I, Franco V, et al. Antiepileptic drugs and brain maturation: fetal exposure to lamotrigine generates cortical malformations in rats. Epilepsy Res. 2008;78:131–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brent RL. Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of diagnostic radiation exposures during and before pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:4–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brent RL. Counseling patients exposed to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2006;20:198–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brent RL. Protection of the gametes, embryo/fetus from prenatal radiation exposure. Health Phys. 2015;108:242–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Reinou S, Groen S, Jin Y, et al. Fear of the unknown: ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy. Am J Obst Gynecol. 2012;203:456–62.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan YC, Nulman I, Koren G. Dose-dependent risk of malformations with antiepileptic drugs: an analysis of data from the EURAP epilepsy and pregnancy registry. Ther Drug Monit. 2015;37:557–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vajda FJ, O’Brien TJ, Graham JE, et al. Dose dependence of fetal malformations associated with valproate. Neurology. 2013;81:999–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gideon Koren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

GK, AO and MB declare no conflict of interests associated with this research. No funding was received for the conduct or publication of the research presented in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koren, G., Berkovitch, M. & Ornoy, A. Dose-Dependent Teratology in Humans: Clinical Implications for Prevention. Pediatr Drugs 20, 331–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-018-0294-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-018-0294-0

Navigation