Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars

  • Original Scientific Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

This in vitro study evaluated the efficacy of three different obturation techniques with regards to quality of two filling pastes—Ca(OH)2/iodoform syringe paste and zinc oxide eugenol paste in primary molars.

Methods

Root canals of 45 extracted primary molars were prepared and randomly divided into three groups of 15 teeth each. Group A—canals were filled with Ca(OH)2/iodoform syringe paste, Group B—zinc oxide eugenol paste with handheld lentulo spiral and Group C—zinc oxide eugenol paste with rotary lentulo spiral. The quality of filled root canals was evaluated with conventional radiography in antero-posterior and lateral dimensions.

Results

There were significant differences between all groups in the presence of voids (p = 0.03) and length of filling (p = 0.002). Half of the sampled teeth in handheld lentulo spiral group had voids in the filled canals, while 80% of the teeth filled with Ca(OH)2/iodoform syringe resulted in overfilling of the paste.

Conclusions

All three delivery methods for the obturation of primary molars' root canals showed inherent limitations in terms of voids and quality of filling. Voids are inevitable and were present in all the techniques. Overfilling was more frequently seen with the syringe method, while the lentulo spiral technique, both handheld and rotary, showed a better quality of filling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anbu R, Nandini S, Velmurugan N. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study. Int Endod J. 2010;43:64–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asokan S, Sooriaprakas C, Raghu V, et al. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study. J Dent Child. 2012;79(2):46–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aylard SR, Johnson R. Assessment of filling techniques for primary teeth. Paediatr Dent. 1987;9:195–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcelos R, Santos MP, Primo LG, et al. ZOE paste pulpectomies outcome in primary teeth: a systematic review. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35:241–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barja-Fidalgo F, Moutinho-Ribeiro M, Oliveira MAA, et al. A systematic review of root canal filling materials for deciduous teeth: is there an alternative for Zinc oxide—Eugenol? ISRN Dent 2011:367318.

  • Barr ES, Flaitz CM, Hicks JM. A retrospective radiographic evaluation of primary molar pulpectomies. Paediatr Dent. 1991;13(1):4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Paediatr Dent. 2006;28(1):39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18:57–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T. An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Paediatr Dent. 1993;15:254–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dultra F, Barroso JM, Carrasco LD, et al. Evaluation of apical microleakage of teeth sealed with four different root canal sealers. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14:341–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Esterla C, Neto IM, Lopes HP, et al. Root canal filling with calcium hydroxide using different techniques. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(1):53–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuks AB, Eidelmen E, Pauker N. Root fillings with Endoflas in primary teeth: a retrospective study. J Clin Paediatr Dent. 2002;27(1):41–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover R, Mehra M, Pandit IK, et al. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(2):104–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guelmann M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in vitro study. J Clin Paediatr Dent. 2004;28:323–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hany M. Pulpectomy procedure in primary molar teeth. Eur J General Dent. 2014;3(1):3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schertzer L, et al. An in vitro evaluation of sealer placement methods. Int Endod J. 1997;30(3):181–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mani SA, Chawla HS, Tewari A, et al. Evaluation of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 2000;67:142–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of Different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography. Paediatr Dent. 2013;35:236–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2004;14:417–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nurko C, Ranly DM, García-Godoy F, et al. Resorption of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth: a case report. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:517–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RG, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, et al. Two-year outcome study of zinc oxide-eugenol root canal treatment for vital primary teeth. J Can Den Assoc. 1993;59:528–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Mctigue DJ, et al. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 2005. p. 375–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramar K, Mungara J. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent. 2010;28:25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuben J, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. The evaluation of root canal morphology of the mandibular first molar in an Indian population using a spiral-computed tomography scan: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2008;34:212–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rood HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, et al. UK clinical guidelines in paediatric dentistry: pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16(Suppl 1):S15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadrian R, Coll JA. A long-term follow-up on the retention rate of zinc oxide eugenol filler after primary tooth pulpectomy. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15:249–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salama FS, Anderson RW, Hanes MC, et al. Anatomy of primary incisor and molar root canals. Paediatr Dent. 1992;14:117–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • San S, Okte Z. Success rate of Sealapex in root canal treatment for primary teeth: 3-year follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:e93–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson A, Stancill R, Madison S. Intracanal placement of Ca(OH)2: a comparison of techniques. J Endod. 1992;18:367–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Chaudhary S, Manuja N, et al. Evaluation of different root canal obturation methods in primary teeth using cone beam computerized tomography. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39(5):462–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smutkeeree A, Phajongviriyatorn P, Komoltri C, et al. Calcium hydroxide medication in primary molars using different preparations and placement techniques: an in vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(4):313–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subba Reddy W, Shakunthala B. Comparative assessment of three obturating techniques in primary molars: an in vivo study. Endodont. 1997;9:13–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres CP, Apicella MJ, Yancich PP, et al. Intracanal placement of calcium hydroxide: a comparison of techniques, revisited. J Endod. 2004;30:225–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trairatvorakul C, Chunlasikaiwan S. Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars: a clinical study. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30:303–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ugur I, Hikmet A, Tamer T. Leakage evaluation of three different root canal obturation techniques using electrochemical evaluation and dye penetration evaluation methods. Aust Endod J. 2007;33:18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vashista K, Sandhu M, Sachdev V. Comparative evaluation of obturating techniques in primary teeth: an in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8(3):176–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Walia T. Pulpectomy in hyperemic pulp and accelerated root resorption in primary teeth: a review with associated case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(3):255–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Walia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author 1 declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author 2 declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author 3 declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author 4 declares that she has no conflict of interest

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walia, T., Ghanbari, A.H., Mathew, S. et al. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 18, 17–23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-016-0258-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-016-0258-4

Keywords

Navigation