Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of the effects of tool and process parameters in hydrodynamic deep drawing assisted by radial pressure

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among the various techniques of sheet hydroforming, hydrodynamic deep drawing assisted by radial pressure (HDDRP) has showed good results to shape parts with uniform thickness distribution and high drawing ratio. In this paper, improving formability of the parts in HDDRP is taken into consideration and the effects of some geometrical parameters such as the die profile radius and the gap between the die and the blank holder, and some process parameters such as pressure path and friction coefficient are investigated on thickness distribution of cylindrical cups and punch force. The pressure path has a great effect on the formability. The results showed that increasing the maximum pressure reduces part thinning in the critical regions. Increasing the pressure above a certain value does not have a significant effect on the part forming, but it increases the punch force. The most appropriate pressure path for forming the part studied in this paper is 27 MPa. Furthermore, thinning of the part and maximum punch force decreases by decreasing the friction between the sheet and blank holder. Moreover, increasing the friction coefficient between the punch and sheet to a certain value (0.2) improves forming condition that results in decreasing thinning of the part. Increasing the friction coefficient more than this value does not have a significant effect on forming the part. Friction between the punch and the sheet does not affect the maximum punch force. The results also illustrated that by increasing the gap between the blank holder and the die to 1.2 mm which is more than the thickness of the sheet, thickness reduction of the part and maximum punch force decreases. Increasing the gap above this value does not have a significant effect on ease of sheet flow and improving part formability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang SH, Wang ZR, Xu Y, Wang ZT, Zhou LX (2004) Recent developments in sheet hydroforming technology. J Mater Process Technol 151:237–241

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rajenthirakumar D, Chandramohan G (2009) Effect of forming parameters in sheet hydro mechanical deep drawing process. J Manuf Eng 1:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lang L, Danckert J, Nielsen KB (2004) Investigation into hydrodynamic deep drawing assisted by radial pressure: Part I. Experimental observations of the forming process of aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol 148(1):119–131

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lang L, Danckert J, Nielsen KB (2005) Investigation into hydrodynamic deep drawing assisted by radial pressure: Part II. Numerical analysis of the drawing mechanism and the process parameters. J Mater Process Technol 166(1):150–161

    Google Scholar 

  5. El-Domiaty A, Shabara MA (1995) Improvement of deep drawability by radially pressurized fluid. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(5):739–749

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thiruvarudchelvan S (1995) A novel hydraulic-pressure augmented deep-drawing process for high draw ratios. J Mater Process Technol 54(1–4):355–361

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang DY, Kim JB, Lee DW (1995) Investigation into manufacturing of very long cups by hydromechanical deep drawing and ironing with controlled radial pressure. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 44(1):255–258

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tirosh J, Shirizly A, Ben-David D, Stanger S (2000) Hydro-rim deep-drawing processes of hardening and rate-sensitive materials. Int J Mech Sci 42(6):1049–1067

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao SD, Zhang ZY, Zhang Y, Yuan JH (2007) The study on forming principle in the process of hydro-mechanical reverse deep drawing with axial pushing force for cylindrical cups. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:300–303

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lang L, Danckert J, Nielsen KB (2004) Study on hydromechanical deep drawing with uniform pressure onto the blank. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(5):495–502

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang H, Gao L, Chen M (2011) Hydrodynamic deep drawing process assisted by radial pressure with inward flowing liquid. Int J Mech Sci 53(9):793–799

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lang L, Li T, Zhou X, Danckert J, Nielsen KB (2007) The effect of the key process parameters in the innovative hydroforming on the formed parts. J Mater Process Technol 187:304–308

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar RU (2012) Effect of blank radius on radial stresses in hydroforming deep drawing process. Int J Appl Res Mech Eng 2:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar RU, Reddy PR, SitaRamaraju AV (2012) Determination of blank holder pressure in hydroforming deep drawing process. Int J Mech Eng Robot Res 2:242–249

    Google Scholar 

  15. Modanloo V, Gorji A, Bakhshi-Jooybari M (2016) Effects of forming media on hydrodynamic deep drawing. J Mech Sci Technol 30(5):2237–2242

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gorji A, Alavi-Hashemi H, Bakhshi-jooybari M, Nourouzi S, Hosseinipour SJ (2011) Investigation of hydrodynamic deep drawing for conical–cylindrical cups. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(9–12):915–927

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu X, Xu Y, Yuan S (2008) Effects of loading paths on hydrodynamic deep drawing with independent radial hydraulic pressure of aluminum alloy based on numerical simulation. J Mater Sci Technol 24(3):395–399

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aue-U-Lan Y, Ngaile G, Altan T (2004) Optimizing tube hydroforming using process simulation and experimental verification. J Mater Process Technol 146:137–143

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brandes EA, Brook GB (1992) Smithells metals reference book. Butterworth-Heinemann, England

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Material Forming New Processes Research Center, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, 4714871167, Iran

    Masoomeh Salahshoor, Hamid Gorji & Mohammad Bakhshi-Jooybari

Authors
  1. Masoomeh Salahshoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamid Gorji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Bakhshi-Jooybari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid Gorji.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Fernando Antonio Forcellini.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salahshoor, M., Gorji, H. & Bakhshi-Jooybari, M. Analysis of the effects of tool and process parameters in hydrodynamic deep drawing assisted by radial pressure. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1648-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1648-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation