Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic Management Towards Competitive Advantage—Patterns of Internationalization in the Finnish and Swedish Sawmill Industries

  • Forest Policy, Economics and Social Research (A Toppinen, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Forestry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The two Nordic European Union countries, Finland and Sweden, have common features and similarities based on their rich forest resources and sizable sawmill industry with internationalization mainly through exports. We compared the Finnish and Swedish sawmill industries and market developments since 1990 and discussed the most eminent country and firm-level differences. In this context, we conducted an academic literature review on strategic approaches of sawmill industries in these countries and mapped the drivers of competitiveness that we could identify from the studies published between years 1990 and 2019.

Recent Findings

In our study, drivers of competitiveness were identified to stem dominantly from the firm-level strategic decisions and use of internal resources and capabilities, whereas the factors related to the external environment were found to be less prominent. From a methodological perspective, the use of qualitative methods has become more common towards the present date, while the use of mixed approaches is very rare.

Summary

Research on sawmill industry strategies is quite versatile, but more comparative studies are needed to increase understanding of the developments and state of complex sawmill business that is influenced by a myriad of internal and also external factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Lähtinen K, Toppinen A. Financial performance in Finnish large- and medium-sized sawmills: the effects of value added creation and cost efficiency seeking. J For Econ. 2008;14(4):289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  2. • Räty T, Toppinen A, Roos A, Nyrud AQ, Riala M. Environmental policy in the Nordic wood product industry: insights into firms’ strategies and communication. Bus Strateg Environ. 2016;25:10–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1853This study presents an in-depth analysis of the strategic role of environmental management in the Nordic wood industry and further raises important considerations to firms’ environmental communication.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Database. Italy: Rome; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mattila O, Hämäläinen K, Häyrinen L, Berghäll S. Strategic business networks in the Finnish wood products industry: a case of two small and medium-sized enterprises. Silva Fenn. 2016;50(3):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Makkonen M. Renewing the sawmill industry: studies on innovation, customer value and digitalization. Dissertationes Forestales 269. Department of Forest Sciences Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry University of Helsinki; 2019. 65 p.

  6. Hietala J, Hänninen R, Toppinen A. Finnish and Swedish sawnwood exports to the UK market in the EMU regime. For Sci. 2013;59(4):379–89. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.10-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mutanen A, Viitanen J. Suomen sahateollisuuden kansainvälinen kustannuskilpailukyky 2000luvulla. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja. 2015;2/2015:69–85. https://doi.org/10.14214/ma.6530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lähtinen K. Linking resource-based view with business economics of woodworking industry: earlier findings and future insights. Silva Fenn. 2007;41(1):312. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF).

  10. Statistics of Sweden (SCB).

  11. World Bank. Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/.

  12. Roos A, Woxblom L, McCluskey D. The influence of architects and structural engineers on timber in construction – perceptions and roles. Silva Fenn. 2010;44(5):871–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tykkä S, McCluskey D, Nord T, Ollonqvist P, Hugosson M, Roos A, et al. Development of timber framed firms in the construction sector - is EU policy one source of their innovation? Forest Policy Econ. 2010;12(3):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hurmekoski E, Hetemäki L, Linden M. Factors affecting sawnwood consumption in Europe. Forest Policy Econ. 2015;50:236–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Finnish Board of Customs. Uljas – Statistical Database.

  16. Swedish Forest Industries Federation.

  17. Toppinen A, Toivonen R, Valkeapää A, Rämö A-K. Consumer perceptions of environmental and social sustainability of wood products in the Finnish market. Scand J For Res. 2013;28(8):775–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.824021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen E, Panwar R, Volsky R. In: Hansen E, Panwar R, Vlosky R, editors. Understanding and managing change in the global forest sector. 2nd ed. Eugene: Shelton Turnball; 2013.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ansoff I. Strategies for diversification. Harv Bus Rev. 1957;35(5):113–24.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barney JB. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag. 1991;17(1):99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Galbreath J. Which resources matter the most to firm success? An exploratory study of resource-based theory? Technovation. 2005;25(9):979–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Porter ME. The role of location in competition. J Econ Bus. 1994;1(1):35–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Porter ME. Competitive strategy. New York: The Free Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Porter ME. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strateg Manag J. 1991;12(52):95–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bonsi R, Gnyawali DR, Hammett AL. Achieving sustained competitive advantage in the forest products firm: the importance of the resource-based view (RBV). J For Prod Bus Res. 2008;5(3) 14 p.

  26. Husso M, Nybakk E. Importance of internal and external factors when adapting to environmental changes in SME sawmills in Norway and Finland: the manager’s view. J For Prod Bus Res. 2010;7:Article No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Korhonen J, Hurmekoski E, Hansen E, Toppinen A. Firm-level competitiveness in the forest industries: review and research implications in the context of bioeconomy strategies. Can J For Res. 2018) dx.doi.org;48:141–52. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2017-0219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stendahl M, Eliasson L. Integrated production of semi-finished components in sawmills, part II: management of internal operations. Wood Mater Sci Eng. 2014;9(1):12–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2013.853690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roos A, Flinkman M, Jäppinen A, Warensjö M. Adoption of value-adding processes in Swedish sawmills. Silva Fenn. 2000;34(4):423–30. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roos A, Flinkman M, Jäppinen A, Lanner G, Warensjö M. Production strategies in the Swedish softwood sawmilling industry. For Policy Econ. 2001;3(3-4):189–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00063-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roos A, Flinkman M, Jäppinen A, Lanner G, Warensjö M. Identification of value-adding strategies in the Swedish sawn wood industry. Scand J For Res. 2002;17(1):90–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/028275802317221127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hugosson M, McCluskey D. Strategic transformations of the Swedish sawmill sector 1990-2005. Studia Forestalia Suecia. 2008;217 33 pp.

  33. Brege S, Nord T, Sjöström R, Stehn L. Value-added strategies and forward integration in the Swedish sawmill industry: positioning and profitability in the high-volume segment. Scand J For Res. 2010;25(5):482–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2010.496738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nord T. Structure and developments in the solid wood value chain. Dominant saw milling strategies and industrialized housing. Licentiate Thesis. 2005;2005:57.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Andersson D, Brege S, Nordigården D, Rehme J. Outsourcing of wood-based component manufacturing: driving forces found in Scandianvian companies. J For Prod Bus Res. 2007;4(7).

  36. Niemelä, Smith. A cross-national investigation of softwood sawmill marketing strategies. For Sci. 1996;42(3):290–9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Niemelä, Smith. A multinational analysis of competitive strategies of softwood sawmills. Scand J For Res. 1997;12(3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. •• Hietala J, Hänninen R, Kniivilä M, Toppinen A. Networks in international opportunity recognition: a multiple case study on Finnish wood product industry SMEs. Manuscript under review. 2019. In this paper the concept of international opportunity recognition is introduced to study sawnwood industry internationalization and use of networks.

  39. Hugosson M, McCluskey DR. Marketing competencies of Swedish sawmill firms. J For Prod Bus Res. 2009;6(5):36.

    Google Scholar 

  40. •• Makkonen M, Sundqvist-Andberg H. Customer value creation in B2B relationships: sawn timber value chain perspective. J For Econ. 2017;29:94–106 This paper addresses a new viewpoint to studies of sawnwood industry competitiveness by emphasizing the role of customer orientation and customer value.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Makkonen M. Stakeholder perspectives on the business potential of digitalization in the wood products industry. BioProd Bus. 2018;3(6):2018.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stendahl M, McCluskey D, Eliasson L. Integrated production of semi-finished components in sawmills, part I: external interactions. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2013.834965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Larsson M, Stendahl M, Anders R. Supply chain management in the Swedish wood products industry – a need analysis. 2016:777–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2016.1170874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Månsson J. Economies of scale in the Swedish sawmill industry. J For Econ. 2003;9(3):169–79. https://doi.org/10.1078/1104-6899-00033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. • Hosseini M, Brege S, Nord T. A combined focused industry and company size investigation of the internationalization-performance relationship: the case of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) within the Swedish wood manufacturing industry. For Policy Econ. 2018;97:110–21 This study provides new insight into the relationship of firm performance and internationalization in the wood products industry by applying a hierarchical regression analysis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lähtinen K, Toppinen A, Leskinen P, Haara A. Resource usage decisions and business success: a case study of Finnish large- and medium-sized sawmills. J For Prod Bus Res. 2009;3(3):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Björheden R, Helstad K. Raw material procurement in sawmills’ business level strategy-a contingency perspective. Int J For Eng. 2005;16(2):47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Välimäki H, Niskanen A, Tervonen K, Laurila I. Indicators of innovativeness and enterprise competitiveness in the wood products industry in Finland. Scand J For Res. 2004;19:90–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580410017898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stendahl M, Roos A, Hugosson M. Product development in the Swedish and Finnish sawmilling industry – a qualitative study of managerial perceptions 2007. 2007;4(4):27.

  50. Toivonen R, Hansen E, Järvinen E, Enroth R-R. The competitive position of the Nordic wood industry in Germany – intangible quality dimensions. Silva Fenn. 2005;39(2):277–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Toivonen R. Product quality and value from consumer perspective – an application to wooden products. J For Econ. 2012;18(2):157–73.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Toppinen A, Lähtinen K, Leskinen L, Österman N. Business networks as a source for competitiveness of the medium-sized Finnish sawmills. Silva Fenn. 2011;45(4):743–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wan M, Lähtinen K, Toppinen A, Toivio M. Opportunities and challenges in emerging bioenergy business: case of Finnish sawmill industry Int. J For Eng. 2012;23(2):89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mutanen A. Estimating substitution in coniferous sawnwood imports into Germany. J For Econ. 2006;12(1):31–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2005.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hänninen RH. Exchange rate changes and the Finnish sawnwood demand and price in the UK market. Silva Fenn. 1998;32(1):61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Toppinen A, Röhr A, Pätäri S, Lähtinen K, Toivonen R. The future of wooden multistory construction in the forest bioeconomy – a Delphi study from Finland and Sweden. J For Econ. 2018;31:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2017.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Packalen T, Kärkkäinen L, Toppinen A. The future operating environment of the Finnish sawmill industry in an era of climate change mitigation policies. Forest Policy Econ. 2017;82:30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Guerrero J, Hansen E. Cross-sector collaboration in the forest products industry: a review of the literature. Can J For Res. 2018;48:1269–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Korhonen J, Giurca A, Brockhaus M, Toppinen A. Actors and politics in Finland’s forest-based bioeconomy network. Sustainability. 2018;10(10):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Li N, Toppinen A, Lantta M. Corporate responsibility in the forest industry SMEs: evidence from China and Finland. J Small Bus Manag. 2016;54(1):162–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Hietala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Jyri Hietala, Riitta Hänninen, Matleena Kniivilä and Anne Toppinen declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Forest Policy, Economics and Social Research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hietala, J., Hänninen, R., Kniivilä, M. et al. Strategic Management Towards Competitive Advantage—Patterns of Internationalization in the Finnish and Swedish Sawmill Industries. Curr Forestry Rep 5, 199–209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00100-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00100-8

Keywords

Navigation