Skip to main content
Log in

A First Test of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Measure of Forgiveness of Self and Others

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study was largely exploratory and sought to begin the development of a measure of implicit forgiveness of self related to “minor” transgressions (mistakes, flaws, shortcomings) versus the forgiveness of others. Forty-seven students completed a scale designed to measure forgiveness of self and others using the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP). The results indicated that the measure of implicit forgiveness diverged from an explicit measure designed to measure the same construct. The key finding was that participants tended to be more forgiving toward themselves than toward others at an implicit level, but on an explicit measure, participants rated their own failures as less acceptable than the failures of others. Overall, the findings suggest that it may be useful to supplement explicit measures of forgiveness with implicit measures in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010a). A sketch of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Murtagh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2010b). Using the implicit association test and the implicit relational assessment procedure to measure attitudes toward meat and vegetables in vegetarians and meat-eaters. The Psychological Record, 60, 287–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Parrot, L., III, O’Connor, L. E., & Wade, N. G. (2001). Dispositional forgiveness: development and construct validity of the Transgression Narrative Test of Forgiveness (TNTF). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1277–1290. doi:10.1177/014616720122710004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brose, L. A., Rye, M. S., & Lutz-Zois, C. (2005). Forgiveness and personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 35–46. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buechsel, R. (2010). Development of an implicit measure of dispositional forgiveness (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Pro Quest Dissertations and Thesis. (UMI No. 3418958).

  • Cardi, M., Milich, R., Harris, M. J., & Kearns, E. (2007). Self-esteem moderates the response to forgiveness instructions among women with a history of victimization. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 804–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2008). Implicit pride and prejudice: A heterosexual phenomenon? In T. G. Morrison & M. A. Morrison (Eds.), Modern prejudice (pp. 195–223). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldring, J. (2011). The development of an implicit association test for measuring forgiveness (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Adelaide Research & Scholarship. (Accession available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/67104)

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1993). Analytic goals and the varieties of scientific contextualism. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 11–27). Reno: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & De Houwer, J. (2011). The dominance of associative theorising in implicit attitude research: Propositional and behavioral alternatives. The Psychological Record, 61, 465–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Vahey, N. (2012). Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M. M., & Lark, R. (2004). Does spirituality add to personality in the study of trait forgiveness? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E. (2001). Forgiveness: who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 194–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2009). The implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) as a measure of implicit relative preferences: a first study. The Psychological Record, 59, 621–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, C., Nam, R., Rowatt, W. C., & Hill, P. (2007). Associations between humility, spiritual transcendence, and forgiveness. In R. Piedmont (Ed.), Research in the social scientific study of religion (pp. 74–94). Herndon: Brill Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roddy, S., Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). Facial reactions reveal that slim is good but fat is not bad: Implicit and explicit measures of body-size bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6), 688–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roddy, S., Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2010). Anti-fat, pro-slim, or both? Using two reaction time based measures to assess implicit attitudes to the slim and overweight. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 416–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Boone, A. L., & Dearing, R. (2005). Forgiving the self: Conceptual issues and empirical findings. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 143–158). New York: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahey, N., Boles, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2010). Measuring adolescents’ smoking-related social identity preferences with the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) for the first time: a starting point that explains later IRAP evolutions. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 453–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L., Jr. (1998). The pyramid model of forgiveness: Some interdisciplinary speculations about unforgiveness and the promotion of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness (pp. 107–138). Radnor, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Ferroni Bast.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bast, D.F., Barnes-Holmes, D. A First Test of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Measure of Forgiveness of Self and Others. Psychol Rec 64, 253–260 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0022-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0022-2

Keywords

Navigation