We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
Log in

A MAGDM Method Considering the Amount and Reliability Information of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs) are flexible to deal with the vague and/or imprecise information. Thus, many multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems are modeled by IFSs or IVIFSs. The comparison of two IVIFSs is still a hot topic, and thereby this paper proposes a new ranking function of IVIFSs, which takes into the amount and the reliability information of an IVIFS and combines the advantages of TOPSIS. Based on the new ranking function, we establish an optimization model to determine the attribute weights when they are unknown and partially known. Moreover, we develop an effective method for solving MAGDM problems in which the attribute values are expressed with IVIFSs. A numerical example of supplier selection problem is examined to demonstrate applicability and feasibility of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S.: A fuzzy linear programming method for group decision making with additive reciprocal fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 246, 19–33 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Tao, Z.F., Chen, H.Y., Zhou, L.G., Liu, J.P.: A generalized multiple attributes group decision making approach based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 16(2), 184–195 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gong, Y.B.: Fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making method based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to global supplier selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 15(4), 392–400 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. José, M.M., Montserrat, C., Liu, P.D.: Decision making with fuzzy induced heavy ordered weighted averaging operators. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 16(3), 277–289 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peng, B., Ye, C.M., Zeng, S.Z.: Some intuitionistic fuzzy weighted geometric distance measures and their application to group decision making. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 22(5), 699–715 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 18, 338–356 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Baležentis, T., Zeng, S.Z.: Group multi-criteria decision making based upon interval-valued fuzzy numbers: an extension of the MULTIMOORA method. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(2), 543–550 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, T.H.: Fuzzy VIKOR method: a case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan. Inf. Sci. 271, 196–212 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wei, G.W.: Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(9), 11671–11677 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, T.Y.: The extended linear assignment method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Appl. Math. Model. 38(7–8), 2101–2117 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 50, 87–96 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Atanassov, K.T., Gargov, G.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 31, 343–349 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Physica-Verlag, New York (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, T.Y., Li, C.H.: Objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures and computational experiment analysis. Appl. Soft Comput. 11, 5411–5423 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beliakov, G., Bustinc, H., Goswami, D.P., Mukherjee, U.K., Pal, N.R.: On averaging operators for Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 181(6), 1116–1124 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pei, Z., Zheng, L.: A novel approach to multi-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(3), 2560–2566 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu ZS, Chen J (2007) On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. In: The 4th international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD’07), vol 2, Haikou, China, pp 466–471

  18. Wang, Z.J., Li, K.W., Wang, K.W.: An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights. Inf. Sci. 179, 3026–3040 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye, J.: Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 7050–7055 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, W.Z.: Comments on “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment” by Jun Ye. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(10), 13186–13187 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, J., Chiclana, F.: Non-dominance and attitudinal prioritisation methods for intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(18), 13409–13416 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, J., Chiclana, F.: A risk attitudinal ranking method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers based on novel attitudinal expected score and accuracy functions. Appl. Soft Comput. 22, 272–286 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, J.Q., Li, K.J., Zhang, H.Y.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach based on prospect score function. Knowl. Based Syst. 27, 119–125 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, X.M., Xu, Z.S.: A new method for ranking intuitionistic fuzzy values and its application in multi-attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 11, 135–146 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang, J., Chen, Y.W., Yang, K.W.: TOPSIS with fuzzy belief structure for group belief multiple criteria decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 9400–9406 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krohling, R.A., Campanharo, V.C.: Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: a case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 4190–4197 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yue, Z.: A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS. Appl. Math. Model. 35, 1926–1936 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Amiri, M.P.: Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 6218–6224 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Amount of information and its reliability in the ranking of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy alternatives. In: Rakus-Andersson, E., Yager, R.R., Ichalkaranje, N., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Recent advances in decision making, pp. 7–19. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu, Z.S.: Intuitionistic fuzzy hierarchical clustering algorithms. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 20, 90–97 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, S.H., Choi, S.H., Kim, K.: An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: range-based approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 118, 139–152 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, S.H., Ahn, B.S.: Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 116, 498–507 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Park, K.S.: Mathematical programming models for characterizing dominance and potential optimality when multicriteria alternative values and weights are simultaneously incomplete. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Humans 34, 601–614 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu, Z.S., Chen, J.: An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Inf. Sci. 177, 248–263 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, D.-F.: Fuzzy multi-objective many-person decision makings and games. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, X., Huang, L., Zhang, P.Y., Xu, X.H., Chen, J.Q.: A solution of data inconsistencises in data integration-designed for pervasive computing environment. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 25, 499–508 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N.: Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy AHP-based approach. Omega 35, 417–431 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71231003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71061006, 61263018, 71171055 and 71001015), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (the Ministry of Education of China, NCET-10-0020), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20113514110009) and “Science and Technology Innovation Team Cultivation Plan of Colleges and Universities in Fujian Province.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hai-Han Chen or Deng-Feng Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, HP., Chen, HH., Fei, W. et al. A MAGDM Method Considering the Amount and Reliability Information of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19, 715–725 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0179-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0179-8

Keywords

Navigation