Skip to main content
Log in

Hesitant Fuzzy Multiattribute Matching Decision Making Based on Regret Theory with Uncertain Weights

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach based on regret theory with hesitant fuzzy analysis is presented in a context of multiattribute matching decision making where the relative weights are uncertain. There are two steps being addressed in this approach. First, we put forward a maximizing differential model to determine the relative weights of hesitant fuzzy attributes, and calculate collective utilities of each attribute according to regret theory. The matching satisfaction degrees (MSDs) are then acquired by aggregating the collective utilities with relative weights. Secondly, an optimal matching model is programmed to generate the matching results based on the MSDs. This model belongs to a sort of multiobjective assignment problem and can be solved using the min–max method. A case study of matching outsourcing contractors and providers in Fuzhou National Hi-tech Zone is conducted to demonstrate the proposed approach and its potential applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gale, D., Shapley, L.S.: College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am. Math. Mon. 69(1), 9–15 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Roth, A.E., Sotomayor, M.: The college admissions problem revisited. Econometrica 57(3), 559–570 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Roth, A.E.: Common and conflicting interests in two-sided matching markets. Eur. Econ. Rev. 27(1), 75–96 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, S., Yongtae, P.: The classification and strategic management of services in e-commerce: development of service taxonomy based on customer perception. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(6), 9618–9624 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Pathak, P.A., Roth, A.E.: The New York city high school match. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(2), 364–367 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, Z.Z., Lp, W.H., Lau, H.C.W.: Multi-objective optimization matching for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges with quantity discounts in brokerage. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(4), 4169–4180 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, D.K., Chiu, H.N., Yeh, R.H., Chang, J.H.: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for solving a bi-objective personnel assignment problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 56(1), 1–10 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wan, S.P., Li, D.F.: Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees. Omega 41(6), 925–940 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morente-Molinera, J.A., Pérez, I.J., Ureña, M.R., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Building and managing fuzzy ontologies with heterogeneous linguistic information. Knowl. Based Syst. 88, 154–164 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Riera, J.V., Massanet, S., Herrera-Viedma, E., Torrens, J.: Some interesting properties of the fuzzy linguistic model based on discrete fuzzy numbers to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Appl. Soft Comput. 36, 383–391 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu, Z.S., Zhang, X.: Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl. Based Syst. 52(6), 53–64 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dong, Y., Chen, X., Herrera, F.: Minimizing adjusted simple terms in the consensus reaching process with hesitant linguistic assessments in group decision making. Inf. Sci. 297(5), 95–117 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong, Y., Zhang, H., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis. Support Syst. 84, 1–15 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Perez, I.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 44(4), 494–498 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiclana, F., García, J.M.T., Moral, M.J.D., Herrera Viedma, E.: A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inf. Sci. 221(2), 110–123 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Placek, M., Rajkumar, B.: Storage exchange: a global trading platform for storage services. In: Euro-Par Parallel Processing, pp. 425–436 (2006)

  18. Engel, Y., Wellman, M.P., Lochner, K.M.: Bid expressiveness and clearing algorithms in multiattribute double auctions. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 110–119 (2006)

  19. Hwang, H.S., Ko, W.H., Goanl, M.J.: Web-based multi-attribute analysis model for make-or-buy decisions. Math. Comput. Model. 46(7), 1081–1090 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, S.Q., Wang, Y.M.: Rank belief degrees fusion method for multi-attribute matching decision making. J. Syst. Eng. 30(1), 25–33 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Neumann, J.L.V., Morgenstern, O.V.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. University Press Princeton, Princeton (1947)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hardie, G.S., Eric, J.J., Peter, S.F.: Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Market Sci. 12(4), 378–394 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Loomes, G., Sugden, R.: Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ. J. 92(368), 805–824 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bell, D.E.: Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30(5), 961–981 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Bleichrodt, H., Cillo, A., Diecidue, E.: A quantitative measurement of regret theory. Manag. Sci. 56(1), 161–175 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xia, M.M., Xu, Z.S.: Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 52(3), 395–407 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Xia, M.M., Xu, Z.S., Chen, N.: Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Decis. Negot. 22(2), 259–279 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Farhadinia, B.: Study on division and subtraction operations for hesitant fuzzy sets, interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets and typical dual hesitant fuzzy sets. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28(3), 1393–1402 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 181(11), 2128–2138 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 26, 410–425 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Roth, A.E., Uriel, G.R.: Stable matchings, optimal assignments, and linear programming. Math. Oper. Res. 18(4), 803–828 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Chorus, C.G.: Regret theory-based route choices and traffic equilibria. Transportmetrica 8(4), 291–305 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Application. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Y.M., Fan, Z.P.: Fuzzy preference relations: aggregation and weight determination. Comput. Ind. Eng. 53(1), 163–172 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Fan, Z.P., Li, M.Y.: Decision analysis method for two-sided satisfied matching considering stable matching condition. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 22(4), 113–118 (2009)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Fan, Z.P., Yue, Q.: Strict two-sided matching method based on complete preference ordinal information. J. Manag. Sci. 17(1), 21–34 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rothblum, U.G.: Characterization of stable matchings as extreme points of a polytope. Math. Program. 54(3), 57–67 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Li, D.F., Wan, S.P.: Fuzzy linear programming approach to multiattribute decision making with multiple types of attribute values and incomplete weight information. Appl. Soft Comput. 13(11), 4333–4348 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Echenique, F.: What matchings can be stable? The testable implications of matching theory. Math. Oper. Res. 33(3), 757–768 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S.: Satisfaction degree based interactive decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment with incomplete weights. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness 22(4), 553–572 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Rodriguez, R.M., Bedregal, B., Bustince, H., Dong, Y.C., et al.: A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making. Towards high quality progress. Inf. Sci. 29, 89–97 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to anonymous referees and editors for their insightful and constructive comments, which have helped to improve the paper. This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 71371053, and the Social Science Foundation of Fujian Province under FJ2015C111.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying-Ming Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Y., Wang, YM. & Chen, SQ. Hesitant Fuzzy Multiattribute Matching Decision Making Based on Regret Theory with Uncertain Weights. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19, 955–966 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0213-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0213-x

Keywords

Navigation