Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Broad-based index for measurement of development

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Social and Economic Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurement of development is important for economists, academicians and policy makers as it deals with broader issues such as satisfaction of basic human needs and goals, well-being, environment protection and of course economic growth. There have been several attempts to construct various indices for measuring development ever since the use of growth in GDP was found to be inadequate. While the use of composite indices was a significant step in this direction, the existing ones are widely criticized on its limited scope while capturing the various dimensions of development process. Moreover, they also lacked in its methodology of aggregation and weighting scheme, where equal weights for its components were taken in most of the cases. In this study, we make an attempt to construct a broad-based development index (BBDI) capturing the overall development process under various dimensions such as society, sustainability, economy and institutions. Apart from its wide coverage, our index is also different from the existing ones in terms of its weighting, where we have used principal component analysis for deriving the variable weights. BBDI is then aggregated for 102 countries measuring their development process from 1996 through 2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sen (1983).

  2. Detailed official report on calculation of HDI can be obtained from the United Nations Development Programme, Human Development reports at http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi.

  3. Can be accessed from WHO/Millennium Development Goals https://www.who.int/topics/millennium_development_goals/about/en/.

  4. Can be accessed from UNDP/Sustainable Development Goals https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html.

  5. Booysen (2002), OECD (2008) and Greco et al. (2018) have presented a detailed discussion on various weighting schemes for the construction of composite index.

  6. Human development Report, UNDP (2016).

  7. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicator methodology and user guide, OECD 2008.

References

  • Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D (2016) Does infrastructure investment lead to economic growth or economic fragility? Evidence from China. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 32(3):360–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen A, Andersen AMN (2004) Social determinants for infant mortality in the Nordic countries, 1980–2001. Scand J Public Health 32(5):381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg LA, Desai D (2013) Background paper: overview on the rule of law and sustainable development for the global dialogue on rule of law and the post-2015 development agenda. UNDP, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom DE, Canning D (2009) Population health and economic growth. Health and growth. Working paper no. 24. World Bank

  • Bloom DE, Canning D, Jamison DT (2004) Health, wealth, and welfare. Finance Dev 41:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Booysen F (2002) An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Soc Indic Res 59(2):115–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland G, Khalid M, Agnelli S, Al-Athel S, Chidzero B, Fadika L Singh M (1987) Our common future (\’brundtland report\’)

  • Chiswick BR, Cohen Y, Zach T (1997) The labor market status of immigrants: effects of the unemployment rate at arrival and duration of residence. Ind Labor Relat Rev 52(2):289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Hart M, Posner S, Talberth J (2009) Beyond GDP: the need for new measures of progress. Pardee Working Paper no.4. Boston University, Boston

  • Decancq K, Lugo MA (2009) Weights in multidimensional indices of wellbeing: an overview. Econom Rev 32(1):7–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai M (1991) Human development: concepts and measurement. Eur Econ Rev 35(1):350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski J, Scott W (1966) The level of living. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Report No. 4. Geneva

  • German Development Cooperation in Energy Sector (2014) Sustainable energy for development. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)

  • Ginsberg N, Osborn J, Blank G (1986) Geographic perspectives on the wealth of nations. Department of Geography Research Paper No. 220, University of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 17–120

  • Goetz AM, Jenkins R (2002) Voice, accountability and human development: the emergence of a new agenda. UNDP: occasional paper, human development report

  • Goossens Y, Mäkipää A et al (2007) Alternative progress indicators to gross domestic product (GDP) as a means towards sustainable development. European Parliament, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, Brussels

  • Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira J (2016) Multiple criteria decision analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Ishizaka A, Matarazzo B, Torrisi G (2017) Stochastic multi-attribute acceptability analysis (SMAA): an application to the ranking of Italian regions. Reg Stud 52(4):585–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Ishizaka A, Tasiou M, Torrisi G (2018) On the methodological framework of composite indices: a review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Soc Indic Res 141(1):61–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grupp H, Mogee ME (2004) Indicators for national science and technology policy: How robust are composite indicators? Res Policy 33(9):1373–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grupp H, Schubert T (2010) Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance. Res Policy 39(1):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guptha KSK, Rao RP (2018) The causal relationship between financial development and economic growth: an experience with BRICS economies. J Soc Econ Dev 20(2):308–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks N, Streeten P (1979) Indicators of development: the search for a basic needs yardstick. World Dev 7(6):567–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson GD, Sofroniou N (1999) The multivariate social scientist: an introduction to generalized linear models. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1999) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai D (2003) Principal component analysis on human development indicators of China. Soc Indic Res 61(3):319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind N (2004) Values reflected in the human development index. Soc Indic Res 66(3):283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindelow M (2006) Sometimes more equal than others: how health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicator. Health Econ 15(3):263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monetary Econ 22(1):3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazziotta M, Pareto A (2012) A non-compensatory approach for the measurement of the quality of life. Quality of life in Italy. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan DV, Richard-Proust C, Sovani NV, Subramanian M (1972) Contents and measurement of socioeconomic development. A staff study of the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Praeger, New York, pp 3–136

  • Michaelson J, Abdallah S, Steuer N, Thompson S, Marks N (2009) National accounts of well-being: bringing real wealth onto the balance sheet. New Economics Foundation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris MD (1979) Measuring the condition of the world’s poor: the physical quality of life index. Pergamon Policy Studies No. 42, pp 20–56

  • Morris MD, Liser FB (1980) The PQLI: measuring progress in meeting human needs. Overseas Development Council, Communique on Development Issues No. 32

  • Myrdal G (1957) Rich lands and poor. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh F (1996) The human development indices: Are they redundant? Occasional papers no. 20. Centre for Development Studies, University of Glasgow, Glasgow

  • Noorbaksh F (1998) A modified human development index. World Dev 26(3):517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Mag Ser 6 2(11):559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perthel D (1981) Laws of development, indicators of development, and their effects on economic growth. Doctoral Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp 6–7

  • Ram R (1982) Composite indices of physical quality of life, basic needs fulfilment, and income. A ‘principal component’ representation. J Dev Econ 11(2):227–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao VVB (1991) Human development report 1990: review and assessment. World Dev 19(10):1451–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion M (1997) Good and bad growth: the human development reports. World Dev 25(5):631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray AK (2008) Measurement of social development: an international comparison. Soc Indic Res 86(1):1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostow WW (1959) The stages of economic growth. Econ History Rev 12(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process: what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9(3–5):161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S (2005) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 168(2):307–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos ME, Santos G (2014) Composite indices of development. In: Currie-Alder B, Kanbur R, Malone D, Medhora R (eds) International development: ideas, experience and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 133–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schepelmann P, Goossens Y, Makipaa A (2010) Towards sustainable development: alternatives to GDP for measuring progress. (No. 42). Wuppertal Spezial

  • Sen A (1983) Development which way now? Econ J 93(372):745–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1998) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (2006) What is the role of legal and judicial reform in the development process? World Bank Legal Rev 2(1):21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan TN (1994) Human development: a new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel? Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 84(2):238–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (2015) Inequality and economic growth. Polit Q 86(S1):134–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J, Sen AK, Fitoussi JP (2009) The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited: reflections and overview. OFCE working paper. Columbia University, New York, NY

  • Streeten P (1995) Human development: the debate about the index. Int Soc Sci J 47(143):25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro MP (1989) Economic development in the third world, 4th edn. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro MP, Smith SC (2011) Economic development, 11th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2016) Human development report: online database. United Nations Development Programme, Brussels. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/data. Accessed 12 Jan 2019

  • UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2013) Data centre. http://stats.uis.unesco.org. Accessed Nov 2013

  • Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE, De Vogli R (2010) Equality, sustainability, and quality of life. BMJ 341:c5816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1991) The World Bank annual report 1991. Washington, DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/262711468313513741/The-World-Bank-annual-report-1991. Accessed 20 Aug 2019

  • World Bank (2012) New directions in justice reform. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/928641468338516754/pdf/706400REPLACEM0Justice0Reform0Final.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2019

  • World Health Organization (2007) Active ageing: a policy framework. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions that helped to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. U. Gopakumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 The broad-based development index.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basel, S., Gopakumar, K.U. & Rao, R.P. Broad-based index for measurement of development. J. Soc. Econ. Dev. 22, 182–206 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-020-00093-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-020-00093-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation