Skip to main content
Log in

Uniform Damping Ratio For Non-Classically Damped Hybrid Steel Concrete Structures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steel–concrete hybrid systems are used in buildings, in which a steel structure has been placed on a concrete structure to make a lighter structure and have a faster construction. Dynamic analysis of hybrid structures is usually a complex procedure due to various dynamic characteristics of each part, i.e., stiffness, mass and especially damping. Dynamic response of hybrid structures has some complications. One of the reasons is the different stiffness of the two parts of structure and another reason is non-uniform distribution of materials and their different features such as damping in main modes of vibration. The available software is not able to calculate damping matrices and analyze these structures because the damping matrix of these irregular structures is non-classical. Also an equivalent damping should be devoted to the whole structure and using the available software. In the hybrid structures, one or more transitional storeys are used for better transition of lateral and gravity forces. In this study, an equation has been proposed to determine the equivalent uniform damping ratio for hybrid steel–concrete buildings with transitional storey(s). In the proposed method, the hybrid structure containing concrete, steel and transitional storeys appropriately substituted with 3-DOF structure. A wide range of eigenfrequency and mass ratios is examined for each ratio pair, and given the characteristics of the primary system, the complete 3-DOF structure can be formed. Equivalent uniform damping ratio is derived by means of a semi-empirical error minimization procedure. The multiple nonlinear regressions are used for determination of equations of modal damping ratios of hybrid buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taranath BS (2011) Structural analysis and design of tall buildings: steel and composite construction. DeSimone Consulting Engineers, Nevada

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Papageorgiou A, Gantes C. Decoupling criteria for dynamic response of primary/secondary structural systems. Proceedings of 4th European workshop on the seismic behavior of irregular and complex structures, 2005

  3. Viest IM, Colaco JP, Furlong RW, Griffs LG, Leon RT, Wyllie LA (1997) Composite construction design for buildings. ASCE/McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou H (2013) Damping of stay cable with passive-on magnetorheological dampers: a full-scale test. Int J Civil Eng 11:9–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hajjar JF (2002) Composite steel and concrete structural systems for seismic engineering. J Constr Steel Res 58:703–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li QS, Yang K, Zhang N, Wong CK, Jeary AP (2002) Field measurements of amplitude-dependent damping in a 79-storey tall building and its effects on the structural dynamic responses. J Struct Des Tall Spec Build 11:129–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson RP (2004) Composite structures of steel and concrete. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Papageorgiou A, Gantes C (2011) Equivalent uniform damping ratios for linear irregularly damped concrete/steel mixed structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zona A, Barbato M, Conte JP (2008) Nonlinear seismic response analysis of steel–concrete composite frames. J Struct Eng 14:986–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SH, Min KW, Hwang JS, Kim J (2004) Evaluation of equivalent damping ratio of a structure with added dampers. J Eng Struct 26:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Villaverde R (2008) A complex modal superposition method for the seismic analysis of structures with supplemental dampers. Proceedings of the 14th World conference on earthquake engineering, 14WCEE, Beijing, China

  12. Kim MC, Jung HJ, Lee IW (1999) Solution of eigenvalue problem for non-classically damped system with multiple frequencies. J Sound Vib 219:207–222

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu J (2004) A synthesis formulation of explicit damping matrix for non-classically damped systems. Nucl Eng Des 227:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang BC, Leung AYT, Lam KL, Cheung VK (1996) Analytical determination of equivalent modal damping ratios of a composite tower in wind-induced vibrations. J Comput Struct 59:311–316

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Matlab, Interactive environment for algorithm development, data visualization, data analysis, and numeric computation, The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA. http://www.mathworks.com. Accessed 12 Jan 2014

  16. IBM Corporation Released (2011) IBM SPSS statistics for windows. IBM Corporation, Amonk

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chopra AK (1995) Dynamics of structures: theory and application to earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall, Upper-Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Structural dynamics. McGraw Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Adhikari S, Wagner N (2004) Direct time–domain integration method for exponentially damped linear systems. J Comput Struct 82:2453–2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cortes F, Mateos M, Elejabarrieta MJ (2009) A direct integration formulation for exponentially damped structural systems. J Comput Struct 87:391–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Adhikari S (2000) Damping models for structural vibration. Ph.D. thesis. University of Cambridge

  22. Chen G, Soong TT (1996) Exact solutions to a class of structure–equipment systems. J Eng Mech ASCE 122:1093–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Özgüven HN (2002) Twenty years of computational methods for harmonic response analysis of non-proportionally damped systems. Proceedings of the 20th international modal analysis conference, Los Angeles

  24. Shahruz SM (1990) Approximate decoupling of the equations of motion of damped linear systems. J Sound Vib 136:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shahruz SM, Langari G (1992) Closeness of the solutions of approximately decoupled damped linear systems to their exact solutions. ASME J Dyn Syst Measur Control 114:369–374

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Park IW, Kim JS, Ma F (1992) On modal coupling in non-classically damped linear systems. Mech Res Commun 19:407–413

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Duncan PE, Taylor RE (1979) A note on the dynamic analysis of non-proportionally damped systems. J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 7:99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Foss KA (1958) Co-ordinates which uncouple the equations of motion of damped linear dynamic systems. Trans ASME J Appl Mech 25:361–364

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Gerami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivandi-Pour, A., Gerami, M. & Kheyroddin, A. Uniform Damping Ratio For Non-Classically Damped Hybrid Steel Concrete Structures. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 14, 1–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0003-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0003-8

Keywords

Navigation