Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of compaction time delay on compaction and strength behavior of lime-treated expansive soil contacted with sulfate

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Application of lime as an additive for controlling the volume change behavior and improving the strength of expansive soils has been in use over several decades. However, the contamination of lime-treated expansive soil with sulfate always results in the deterioration of treated expansive soil. Therefore, this paper highlights the effect of sodium sulfate solution on compaction and strength behavior of lime-treated expansive soil. Further, the effect of compaction time delay and contact period of sulfate solution with lime-treated soil is also brought out in this paper. To bring out the above effects, the lime contents corresponding to the initial consumption of lime (ICL) and ICL ± 1% were used along with sulfate solutions of 5000, 10,000 and 20,000 ppm. The experimental study showed that upon mixing the lime-treated expansive soil with sulfate solutions, the maximum dry unit weight decreased and optimum moisture content increased with increase in concentration of sulfate solutions when compacted without any compaction delay. With compaction time delay, the lime-stabilized soils mixed with distilled water led to the formation of flocs and aggregation of clay particles and decreased the maximum dry unit weight and optimum moisture content. However, the effect of compaction time delay was negligible on maximum dry unit weight as the formation of flocs and aggregation of clay particles were inhibited in lime-treated soil mixed with sulfate solutions. These changes in dry unit weights and soil structure were reflected on the strength of lime-treated expansive soil as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diamond S, Kinter EB (1965) Mechanism of soil-lime stabilization. Bureau of Public Roads, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yadima SG, Nwaiwu CMO (2001) Effect of delay after mixing on the compaction characteristics of cement-stabilized semi-arid zone soils. Ann Borno 17(18):274–282

    Google Scholar 

  3. Osinubi KJ, Nwaiwu CMO (2006) Compaction delay effects on properties of lime-treated soil. J Mater Civ Eng ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18:2(250)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen FH (1988) Foundations on expansive soils. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burbank M, Weaver T, Lewis R, Williams T, Williams B, Crawford R (2013) Geotechnical tests of sands following bioinduced calcite precipitation catalyzed by indigenous bacteria. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mishra AK, Dhawan S, Rao SM (2007) Analysis of swelling and shrinkage behavior of compacted clays. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-007-9165-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thyagaraj T, Zodinsanga S (2014) Swell–shrink behaviour of lime precipitation treated soil. Proc Inst Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.12.00028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hausmann MR (2013) Engineering principles of ground modification. McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited, Noida

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herrin M, Mitchell H (1961) Lime–soil mixtures. Highw Res Board Bull 304:99–138

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bell FG (1988) Stabilization and treatment of clay soils with lime, part 1—basic principles. Gr Eng 21(2):10–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rao SM, Venkataswamy B (2002) Lime pile treatment of black cotton soils. Proc Inst Civil Eng Gr Improv. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2002.6.2.85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor WH, Arman A (1960) Lime stabilization using preconditioned soils. Highw Res Board Bull 262:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell JK, Hooper DR (1961) Influence of time between mixing and compaction on properties of a lime stabilised expansive clay. Highw Res Board Bull 139:14–31

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dumbleton MJ (1962) Investigations to assess the potentialities of lime for soil stabilization in the United Kingdom. Road Research Laboratories, Crowthorne, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bhattacharia S, Bhatty JI, Todres HA (2003) Stabilization of clay soils by Portland cement or lime a critical review of literature. PCA R&D Serial No. 2066. Portland Cement Association, Skokie

    Google Scholar 

  16. Osinubi KJ (1998) Influence of compactive efforts and compaction delays on lime-treated soil. Jpn Transp Eng 124(2):149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Le Roux A (1969) Traitement des sols argileux par la chaux. Bulletin de Liaison des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussees 40:59–95

    Google Scholar 

  18. Le Roux A, Toubeau PH (1987) Mise en evidence du seuil de nocivite et du mecanisme d’action des sulfures au cours d’un traitement a la chaux. In: 9th South East Asian geotechnical conference, Bangkok

  19. Locat J, Berube MA, Choquete M (1990) Laboratory investigations on the lime stabilization of sensitive clays: shear strength development. Can Geotech J 27(3):294–304. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Minnick LJ, Williams R (1956) Field evaluation of lime-fly ash-soil composition for roads. Highw Res Bull 129:83–99

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter D (1988) Lime-induced heave in sulfate bearing clay soils. J Geotech Eng ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1988)114:2(150)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell JK, Dermatas D (1990) Clay soil heave caused by lime-sulfate reactions. ASTM Special Technical Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kota PB, Hazlett D, Perrin L (1996) Sulfate-bearing soils: problems with calcium based stabilizers. J Transp Res Board. https://doi.org/10.3141/1546-07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burkart B, Goss CG, Kern PJ (1999) The role of gypsum in production of sulfate induced deformation of lime-stabilized soils. Environ Eng Geosci. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.v.2.173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wild S, Abdi MR, Leng WG (1993) Sulphate expansion of lime-stabilized kaolinite: II. Reaction products and expansion. Clay Miner. https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.1993.028.4.07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mehta PK (1973) Mechanism of expansion associated with ettringite formation. Cem Concr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(73)90056-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ogawa K, Roy DM (1982) C4A3S hydration ettringite formation and its expansion mechanism: III. Effect of CaO, NaOH and NaCL; conclusions. Cem Concr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(82)900-114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Min D, Mingshu T (1994) Formation and expansion of ettringite crystals. Cem Concr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)90092-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Diamond S (1996) Delayed ettringite formation-processes and problems. Cem Concrete Compos 18:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chrysochoou M, Grubb DG, Malasavage NE (2012) Assessment of sulfate-induced swell in stabilized dredged material: is ettringite always a problem? J Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Raja PSK, Thyagaraj T (2019) Effect of sulfate contamination on compaction and strength behavior of lime treated expansive soil. Recent advancements in expansive soils. Springer, New York, pp 15–27

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eades JL, Grim RE (1966) A quick test to determine lime requirements for lime stabilization. Highw Res Rec 139:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sridharan A, Sivapullaiah PV (2005) Mini compaction test apparatus for fine grained soil. Geotech Test J. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ12542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Raja PSK, Thyagaraj T (2019) Effect of short-term sulphate contamination on lime-stabilized expansive soil. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1641665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Penumadu D, Dean J (2000) Compressibility effect in evaluating the pore-size distribution of kaolin clay using mercury intrusion porosimetry. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-37-2-393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bell FG (1996) Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soil. Eng Geol. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(96)00028-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lees G, Abdelkader MO, Hamdani SK (1982) Effect of the clay fraction on some mechanical properties of lime–soil mixtures. J Inst Highw Eng 11:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sante MD, Fratalocchi E, Mazzieri F, Brianzoni V (2015) Influence of delayed compaction on the compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of soil–lime mixtures. Eng Geol. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim900040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Russo G, Modoni G (2013) Fabric changes induced by lime addition on a compacted alluvial soil. Geotech Lett. https://doi.org/10.1680/geolett.13.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Thyagaraj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raja, P.S.K., Thyagaraj, T. Effect of compaction time delay on compaction and strength behavior of lime-treated expansive soil contacted with sulfate. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 5, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-0268-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-0268-2

Keywords

Navigation