Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of Linear and Nonlinear damper connected buildings under blast and seismic excitations

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During an earthquake, adjacent buildings with insufficient separations often collide into each imposing unexpected impact loading on buildings causing severe damage and even collapse of many buildings. In the present study, the passive control of closely spaced fixed base structures is investigated under the effects of earthquakes and blast-induced vibrations. The study analyzes two closely spaced dynamically dissimilar fixed base buildings connected using linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers when subjected to blast and seismic excitations. A parametric study on the damping coefficient of fluid dampers is conducted to obtain an optimum damping coefficient for linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers. The present study investigates the comparative performance behavior of the linear and nonlinear dampers in response reduction of adjacent buildings under blast and earthquake motions. The placement of dampers in the response mitigation due to the selected excitations is also reviewed. Results exhibit the efficiency of viscous dampers in reducing the structural responses of flexible buildings. It is also concluded that the placement of dampers at the top floor alone yields significant reduction in the structural responses when compared with the placement of dampers at all floors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal VK (2004) Pounding and impact of base isolated buildings due to earthquakes. M. S. Graduate study thesis, A&M University, Texas

  2. Jain SK, Lettis WR, Murty CVR, Bardet JP (2002) Bhuj-India earthquake of January 26-2001 Reconnaissance Report, Public No-2-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA, USA

  3. Patil US (2004) Risk reduction in school buildings against earthquake. In: Proceedings of New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering Conference (NZSEE-2004), New Zealand, pp 42–44

  4. Rosenblueth E, Meli R (1986) The 1985 earthquake: causes and effects in Mexico City. Concr Int 8(5):23–24

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anagnostopoulos SA (1988) Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16(3):443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maison BF, Kasai K (1992) Dynamics of pounding when two buildings collide. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21(9):771–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raheem SEA, Fooly MY, Shafy AGA, Abbas YA, Omar M, Latif M, Mahmoud S (2018) Seismic pounding effects on adjacent buildings in series with different alignment configurations. Steel Compos Struct 28(3):289–308

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raheem SEA (2014) Mitigation measures for earthquake induced pounding effects on seismic performance of adjacent buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 12(4):1705–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang TL, Li QN, Zong XM (2013) Pounding responses of an expansion joint in a curved ramp bridge under earthquake conditions. J Highw Transp Res Dev (Engl Edn) 7(1):38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Raheem SEA, Hayashikawa T (2013) Mitigation measures for expansion joint effects on seismic performance of bridge structures. In: Proceedings of the 13th East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-13), pp B-1

  11. Raheem SEA (2014) Exploring seismic response of bridges with bidirectional coupled modelling of base isolation bearings system. Arab J Sci Eng 39(12):8669–8679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lua TWY, Mendis P, Ngo T, Zhang L, Mohotti D, Sofi M (2014) Blast studies on bridges—a state of the art review. Electron J Struct Eng 14:7–19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xu YL, He Q, Ko JM (1999) Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation. Eng Struct 21(2):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhaskararao AV, Jangid RS (2004) Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected with dampers. In: 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, vol 3143

  15. Bhaskararao AV, Jangid RS (2006) Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected with friction dampers. Bull Earthq Eng 4:43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel CC, Jangid RS (2011) Dynamic response of adjacent structures connected by friction damper. Earthq Struct 2:149–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel CC, Jangid RS (2014) Dynamic response of identical adjacent structures connected by viscous damper. Struct Control Health Monit 21:205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel CC, Jangid RS (2010) Seismic response of dynamically similar adjacent structures connected with viscous dampers. IES J Part A Civ Struct Eng 3(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kangda MZ, Bakre S (2019) Response control of adjacent structures subjected to blast-induced vibrations. Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 172(12):902–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seto K, Matsumoto Y (1999) Active vibration control of multiple buildings connected with active control bridges in response to large earthquakes. Am Control Conf 2:1007–1011

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bharti SD, Dumne SM, Shrimali MK (2010) Seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings connected with MR dampers. Eng Struct 32(8):2122–2133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisco NR, Adeli H (2011) Smart structures: part I—active and semi-active control. Sci Iran 18(3):275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sandoval MR, Ugarte LB, Spencer BF (2012) Study of structural control in coupled buildings. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering

  24. Pérez LA, Avila S, Doz G (2014) Seismic response control of adjacent buildings connected by viscous and hybrid dampers. Dyn Civ Struct 4:433–440

    Google Scholar 

  25. Palacios-Quinonero F, Rubió-Massegú J, Rossell JM, Karimi HR (2012) Semiactive–passive structural vibration control strategy for adjacent structures under seismic excitation. J Franklin Inst 349(10):3003–3026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Matsagar VA, Jangid RS (2006) Base-isolated building connected to adjacent building using viscous dampers. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 39(1):59–80

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shrimali MK, Bharti SD, Dumne SM (2015) Seismic response analysis of coupled building involving MR damper and elastomeric base isolation. Ain Shams Eng J 6(2):457–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Murase M, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2013) Smart passive control of buildings with higher redundancy and robustness using base-isolation and inter-connection. Earthq Struct 4(6):649–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Makita K, Murase M, Kondo K, Takewaki I (2018) Robustness evaluation of base-isolation building-connection hybrid-controlled building structures considering uncertainties in deep ground. Front Built Environ 4(16):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kasagi M, Fujita K, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2016) Automatic generation of smart earthquake-resistant building system: hybrid system of base-isolation and building-connection. J Heliyon 2(2):e00069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mahmoud S (2016) Dynamic response of adjacent buildings under explosive loads. Arab J Sci Eng 41(10):4007–4018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jankowski R, Mahmoud S (2016) Linking of adjacent three storey buildings for mitigation of structural pounding during earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 14(11):3075–3097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Takewaki I (2007) Earthquake input energy to two buildings connected by viscous dampers. J Struct Eng 133(5):620–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kasagi M, Fujita K, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2016) Effect of non-linearity of connecting dampers on vibration control of connected building structures. Front Built Environ 1(25):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mukherjee S, Gupta VK (2002) Wavelet-based generation of spectrum-compatible time-histories. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(9):799–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. IS 1893 BIS (2002) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures part 1 general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, Fifth revision

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kangda MZ, Bakre S (2018) The effect of LRB parameters on structural responses for blast and seismic loads. Arab J Sci Eng 44(4):1761–1776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar R, Choudhury D, Bhargava K (2016) Determination of blast-induced ground vibration equations for rocks using mechanical and geological properties. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(3):341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Narkhede DI, Sinha R (2014) Behavior of nonlinear fluid viscous dampers for control of shock vibrations. J Sound Vib 333(1):80–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammed Zain Kangda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kangda, M.Z., Bakre, S. Performance of Linear and Nonlinear damper connected buildings under blast and seismic excitations. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00502-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00502-3

Keywords

Navigation