Abstract
The theory of three-way decision is about a philosophy of thinking in threes, a methodology of working with threes, and a mechanism of processing in threes. We approach a whole through three parts, in terms of three units, or from three perspectives. A trisecting–acting–outcome (TAO) model of three-way decision involves trisecting a whole into three parts and acting on the three parts, in order to produce an optimal outcome. In this paper, we further explore the TAO model in a set-theoretic setting and make three new contributions. The first contribution is an examination of three-way decision with nonstandard sets for representing concepts under the two kinds of objective/ontic and subjective/epistemic uncertainty. The second contribution is an introduction of an evaluation-based framework of three-way decision. We present a classification of trisections and investigate the notion of an evaluation space. The third contribution is, within the proposed framework, a systematical study of three-way decision with rough sets, interval sets, fuzzy sets, shadowed sets, rough fuzzy sets, interval fuzzy sets (or equivalently, vague sets, interval-valued fuzzy sets, intuitionistic fuzzy sets), and soft sets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afridi MK, Azam N, Yao JT, Alanazi E (2018) A three-way clustering approach for handling missing data using GTRS. Int J Approx Reason 98:11–24
Agbodah K (2019) The determination of three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets considering the loss function evaluated by multiple experts. Granul Comput 4:285–297
Arnauld A, Nicole P (1996) Logic or the art of thinking, translated by Jill Vance Buroker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96
Atanassov KT (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Springer, Heidelberg
Béziau JV (2012) The power of the hexagon. Log Univ 6:1–43
Bustince H, Burillo P (1996) Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79:403–405
Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG (1994) Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychol Bull 115:401–423
Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL, Berntson GG (1997) Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: the case of attitudes and evaluative space. Pers Soc Psycholog Rev 1:3–25
Cai MJ, Li QG, Lang GM (2017) Shadowed sets of dynamic fuzzy sets. Granul Comput 2:85–94
Ciucci D (2011) Orthopairs: a simple and widely used way to model uncertainty. Fundam Inform 108:287–304
Couso I, Dubois D (2014) Statistical reasoning with set-valued information: ontic vs. epistemic views. Int J Approximate Reason 55:1502–1518
Deng XF, Yao YY (2014) Decision-theoretic three-way approximations of fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 279:702–715
Dubois D (2010) Degrees of truth, ill-known sets and contradiction. In: Bouchon-Meunier B, Magdalena L, Ojeda-Aciego M, Verdegay JL, Yager RR (eds) Foundations of reasoning under uncertainty. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–83
Dubois D, Prade H (2008) An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference. Int J Intell Syst 23:866–877
Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17:191–209
Dubois D, Prade H (2012) Gradualness, uncertainty and bipolarity: making sense of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 192:3–24
Dundes A (1968) The number three in American culture. In: Dundes A (ed) Every man his way: readings in cultural anthropology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 401–424
Gau WL, Buehrer DJ (1993) Vague sets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:610–614
Horiuchi K, Šešelja B, Tepavčević A (2020) Trice-valued fuzzy sets: mathematical model for three-way decisions. Inf Sci 507:574–584
Hu BQ (2014) Three-way decisions space and three-way decisions. Inf Sci 281:21–52
Hu BQ, Wong H, Yiu KFC (2017) On two novel types of three-way decisions in three-way decision spaces. Int J Approx Reason 82:285–306
Lang GM, Luo JF, Yao YY (2020) Three-way conflict analysis: a unification of models based on rough sets and formal concept analysis. Know Based Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105556
Li HX, Zhang LB, Zhou XZ, Huang B (2017a) Cost-sensitive sequential three-way decision modeling using a deep neural network. Int J Approx Reason 85:68–78
Li JH, Huang CC, Qi JJ, Qian YH, Liu WQ (2017b) Three-way cognitive concept learning via multi-granularity. Inf Sci 378:244–263
Li XN (2019) Three-way fuzzy matroids and granular computing. Int J Approx Reason 114:44–50
Li XN, Yi HJ, She YH, Sun BZ (2018) Generalized three-way decision models based on subset evaluation. Int J Approx Reason 83:142–159
Li ZW, Huang D (2019) A three-way decision method in a fuzzy condition decision information system and its application in credit card evaluation. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00172-8
Liang DC, Wang MW, Xu ZS, Liu D (2020) Risk appetite dual hesitant fuzzy three-way decisions with TODIM. Inf Sci 507:585–605
Liu D, Liang DC (2016) Generalized three-way decisions and special three-way decisions. J Front Comput Sci Technol 11:502–510
Liu D, Liang DC, Wang CC (2016) A novel three-way decision model based on incomplete information system. Knowl Based Syst 91:32–45
Ma JM, Zhang HY, Qian YH (2019) Three-way decisions with reflexive probabilistic rough fuzzy sets. Granul Comput 4:363–375
Mandal P, Ranadive AS (2019) Multi-granulation interval-valued fuzzy probabilistic rough sets and their corresponding three-way decisions based on interval-valued fuzzy preference relations. Granul Comput 4:89–108
Molodtsov D (1999) Soft set theory: first results. Comput Math Appl 37:19–31
Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH (1957) The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Chicago
Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inform Sci 11:341–356
Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Pedrycz W (1998) Shadowed sets: representing and processing fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 28:103–109
Pedrycz W (2009) From fuzzy sets to shadowed sets: interpretation and computing. Int J Intell Syst 24:48–61
Pedrycz W, Vukovich G (2002) Granular computing with shadowed sets. Int J Intell Syst 17:173–197
Qiao JS, Hu BQ (2020) On decision evaluation functions in generalized three-way decision spaces. Inf Sci 507:733–754
Walker WE, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs JP, van Asselt MBA, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integr Assess 4:5–17
Yang JL, Yao YY (2020) Semantics of soft sets and three-way decision with soft sets. Know Based Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105538
Yang JL, Yao YY (2019) From intuitionistic fuzzy sets to shadowed sets: a three-way decision formulation. Manuscript
Yang X, Li TR, Liu D, Fujita H (2019a) A temporal-spatial composite sequential approach of three-way granular computing. Inf Sci 486:171–189
Yang XP, Li TJ, Tan AH (2019b) Three-way decisions in fuzzy incomplete information systems. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-019-01025-1
Yao YY (1993) Interval-set algebra for qualitative knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on computing and information, pp 370–374
Yao YY (2010) Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Inf Sci 180:341–353
Yao YY (2012) An outline of a theory of three-way decisions, RSCTC 2012. LNCS (LNAI) 7413:1–17
Yao YY (2015) The two sides of the theory of rough sets. Knowl Based Syst 80:67–77
Yao YY (2016) Three-way decisions and cognitive computing. Cognit Comput 8:543–554
Yao YY (2017) Interval sets and three-way concept analysis in incomplete contexts. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 8:3–20
Yao YY (2018) Three-way decision and granular computing. Int J Approx Reason 103:107–123
Yao YY (2019a) Three-way conflict analysis: reformulations and extensions of the Pawlak model. Knowl Based Syst 180:26–37
Yao YY (2019b) Tri-level thinking: models of three-way decision. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-019-01040-2
Yao YY (2020) Three-way granular computing, rough sets, and formal concept analysis. Int J Approx Reason 116:106–125
Yao YY, Wang S, Deng XF (2017) Constructing shadowed sets and three-way approximations of fuzzy set. Inf Sci 412–413:132–153
Yu H (2018) Three-way decisions and three-way clustering. In: IJCRS 2018, LNCS (LNAI), vol 11103, pp 13–28
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353
Zhang CY, Feng XZ, Gao RY (2019a) Three-way decision models and its optimization based on Dempster–Shafer evidence theory and rough sets. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00201-6
Zhang CY, Gao RY, Qin H, Feng XZ (2019b) Three-way clustering method for incomplete information system based on set-pair analysis. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00197-z
Zhang QH, Xia DY, Liu KY, Wang GY (2020) A general model of decision-theoretic three-way approximations of fuzzy sets based on a heuristic algorithm. Inf Sci 507:522–539
Zhang Y, Yao JT (2020) Game theoretic approach to shadowed sets: a three-way tradeoff perspective. Inf Sci 507:540–552
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by a Discovery Grant from NSERC, Canada. The author thanks Professors Witold Pedrycz and Shyi-Ming Chen for their encouragements during the preparation of the paper. The author is grateful to reviewers for their constructive and critical comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest of the research reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, Y. Set-theoretic models of three-way decision. Granul. Comput. 6, 133–148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00211-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00211-9