Skip to main content
Log in

The practical importance of understanding placebo effects and their role when approving drugs and recommending doses for medical practice

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Behaviormetrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The general reliance on blinded placebo-controlled randomized trials, both to approve drugs and to set their recommended dosages, although statistically sound for some purposes, may be statistically naïve in the context of guiding general medical practice. Briefly, the reason is that medical prescriptions are unblinded, and so patients who receive drugs in practice receive both the active medical effect of the drug, as estimated in blinded trials, as well as any “placebo effects”, rarely carefully defined or estimated, but intuitively defined as the extra effect, on “you”, when you think you are being actively treated, even when in fact you may not be receiving anything that actually works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Applications invited discussion article, with discussion and rejoinder. J Am Stat Assoc 91(434):444–472

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Feldman D (1991) Compliance as an explanatory variable in clinical trials. J Am Stat Assoc 86:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangakis CE, Rubin DB (2002) Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics 58(1):21–29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frangakis CE, Rubin DB, Zhou XH (2002) Clustered encouragement designs with individual noncompliance: bayesian inference with randomization, and application to advance directive forms with discussion and rejoinder. Biostatistics 3(2):147–177

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano K, Imbens G, Rubin DB, Zhou XH (2000) Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design. Biostatistics 1:69–88

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holland PW (1986) Statistics and causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc 81(396):945–960

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens G, Rubin DB (2015) Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes J (1976) The origin of consciousness in the break-down of the bicameral mind. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin H, Rubin DB (2008) Principal stratification for causal inference with extended partial compliance: application to Efron–Feldman data. J Am Stat Assoc 103:101–111

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Mealli F (2014) A conversation with Donald B. Rubin. Stat Sci 29(3):439–457

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 66(5):688–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1975) Bayesian inference for causality: the importance of randomization. In: The Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. pp 233–239

  • Rubin DB (1976) Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63(3):581–592

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1977) Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. J Educ Stat 2(1):1–26

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1978) Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Ann Stat 6(1):34–58

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1979) Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):318–328

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1980) Comment on “Randomization analysis of experimental data in the Fisher randomization test” by Basu. J Am Stat Assoc 75(371):591–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (2006) Matched sampling for causal effects. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (2010) Reflections stimulated by the comments of Shadish (2010) and West and Thoemmes (2010). Psychol Methods 15(1):38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (2019) Essential concepts of causal inference: a remarkable history and an intriguing future. Biostat Epidemiol (to appear)

  • Tomkins SS (1962) Affect imagery consciousness. Tavistock, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heruristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank the editorial board for their helpful comments and their encouragement to expand Section 1 to include more details of my transitions between academic fields.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald B. Rubin.

Additional information

Communicated by Maomi Ueno.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubin, D.B. The practical importance of understanding placebo effects and their role when approving drugs and recommending doses for medical practice. Behaviormetrika 47, 5–18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-019-00091-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-019-00091-7

Keywords

Navigation