Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A critique of “Forest School” or something lost in translation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a critique of an approach to outdoor education experienced in the UK as Forest School. Forest School came to the UK primarily from Scandinavia, where early years education conducted in the outdoors is a widely accepted practice. In its move to the UK, however, three major issues have arisen. The first concerns how Forest School as a form of outdoor education is culturally, socially and historically situated. This suggests that its adoption in the UK must navigate cultural differences, acknowledging that Forest School is a social construction. Secondly, the pedagogy of Forest School, relevant as it is to early years education, is undertheorised in the outdoor education literature. This especially relates to considerations of play as a central tenet of Forest School pedagogy. Thirdly, the expansion of Forest School in the UK has taken a particularly corporate turn, resulting in a rapid institutionalization and commodification of Forest School practices. The need to situate claims made for and about Forest School in well designed and conducted research is crucial to substantiating what can degenerate into market based promotion. Finally, some of the very positive contributions Forest School is making to the development of contemporary practices of outdoor and environmental education are introduced. This critique is written in the spirit of engaging in robust discussion and debate around Forest School in order to see the difficulties addressed and the positive contributions continue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Place as the geographical construct explored by Tuan (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  2. It is not the purpose to explore play in detail here, but the work of Bruce (2011b) is recommended as essential reading.

  3. The plural Forest Schools is a trademark of Archimedes Training Ltd.

  4. The Forest Education Initiative is part of the Forestry Commission. The Forestry Commission is a non-ministerial UK government department responsible for forestry in England and Scotland.

  5. I have not explored here the setting as ‘unfamiliar’ when the Forest School ethos is one where the experience is repeated and regular – perhaps it should read ‘not the usual classroom one’?

  6. After Prensky (2001) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

References

  • Andkjær, S. (2012). A cultural and comparative perspective on outdoor education in New Zealand and friluftsliv in Denmark. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning., 12(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2011.643146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archimedes Training. (2012a). Bush schools Australia. Retrieved October 1, 2013, from http://www.forestschools.com/bush-schools-australiasia/

  • Archimedes Training. (2012b). Welcome to Forest Schools. Retrieved October 1, 2013, from http://www.forestschools.com/

  • Beames, S., & Brown, M. (2014). Enough of Ronald and Mickey: focusing on learning in outdoor education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning., 14(2), 118–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentsen, P., & Jensen, F. S. (2012). The nature of udeskole: outdoor learning theory and practice in Danish schools. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 12(3), 199–219.

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, T. (2011a). Learning through play, for babies, toddlers and young children (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, T. (2011b). Early childhood education (4th ed.). Abingdon: Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1977). The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11–21.

  • Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L. (1999). The 1944 education act and outdoor education: From policy to practice. History of Education, 28(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cree, J. (2009). Forest school and the learning outside the classroom manifesto. Horizons, 46, 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdell, K., Gray, T., & Malone, K. (2011). Nature and its Influence on Children’s Outdoor Play. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 15(2), 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N. (2001). Self esteem: The costs and causes of low self worth. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

  • Forest Education Initiative. (2008). What is an FEI recognised Forest School? Retrieved September 19, 2008, from http://www.foresteducation.org/forest_schools.php

  • Forest School Association. (2013). Welcome to the Forest School Association website. Retrieved September 7, 2013, from http://www.forestschoolassociation.org/

  • Forest School Training. (n.d.). Research on Forest School. Retrieved November 20, 2014, from http://www.forestschooltraining.co.uk/forest-school/research/

  • Forest Schools Education (n.d.). Level 3. Retrieved August 8, 2016, from: https://www.forestschools.com/training/level-3/

  • Gelter, H. (2000). Friluftsliv: the Scandinavian philosophy of outdoor life. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American psychologist., 40(3), 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (2003). Social construction: a reader. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, M., Passy, R., Waite, S., & Cook, R. (2017). Exploring schools’ use of natural spaces. Risk, Protection, Provision and Policy, 103–124.

  • Gray, C., & MacBlain, S. (2012). Learning theories in childhood. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurholt, K. P. (2014). Joy of nature, friluftsliv education and self: combining narrative and cultural–ecological approaches to environmental sustainability. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning., 14(3), 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F. (2015). The nature of learning at forest school: practitioners' perspectives. Education, 3-13, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1078833

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, B. (2001). Lessons from Norway: Language and outdoor life. Pathways: The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education, 13(3), 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberstone, B., & Stan, I. (2012). Nature and well-being in outdoor learning: Authenticity or performativity. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 12(3), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. (2009). Forest schools and outdoor learning in the early years. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. (2011a). Risk and adventure in early years outdoor play: Learning from forest schools. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. (Ed.). (2011b). Forest school for all. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. (Ed.). (2013). International perspectives on forest school: Natural places to play and learn. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods. New York: Algonquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loynes, C. (1998). Adventure in a bun. The Journal of Experimental Education, 21(1), 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loynes, C. (2002). The generative paradigm. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2(2), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, T., & Waters, J. (2007). Learning in the outdoor environment: a missed opportunity? Early Years. An International Research Journal, 27(3), 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Parker, D. (2006). ‘I think it’s low self-esteem’. Teachers’ judgements: A cautionary tale. Education 3–13, 3(1), 19–25.

  • Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education (5th ed.). San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. (2003). Forest school evaluation project. A study in Wales, April to November, 2003. New Economics Foundation. Retrieved 17 December 2013, from http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/ForestSchoolWalesReport.pdf/$FILE/ForestSchoolWalesReport.pdf

  • Murray, R., & O’Brien, E. A. (2005). Such enthusiasm – a joy to see. In An evaluation of Forest School in England. Farnham: Forest Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Open College Network. (2012). Qualification and assessment specification: NOCN level 3 certificate in forest school programme leadership (QCF). Retrieved May, 31, 2013 from http://www.nocn.org.uk/qualifications_and_units/

  • O’Brien, E. A., & Murray, R. (2006). A marvellous opportunity for children to learn: A participatory evaluation of Forest School in England and Wales. Farnham: Forest Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, E. A., & Murray, R. (2007). ‘Forest School’ in England: An evaluation of three case study settings. Environmental Education., 84, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, E. A. (2009). Learning outdoors: the Forest School approach. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary. Elementary and Early Years Education, 37(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270802291798

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ord, J., & Leather, M. (2011). The substance beneath the labels of experiential learning: The importance of John Dewey for outdoor educators. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 15(2), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

  • Quay, J. (2016). From human–nature to cultureplace in education via an exploration of unity and relation in the work of Peirce and Dewey. Studies in Philosophy and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9507-6

  • Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgers, N. D., Knowles, Z. R., & Sayers, J. (2012). Encouraging play in the natural environment: A child-focused case study of Forest School. Children's geographies, 10(1), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (1993). The McDonaldisation of Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (1998). Rereading Lyotard: Knowledge, commodification and higher education. Electronic Journal of Sociology. ISSN: 1198 3655, Retrieved November 5, 2014, from http://sys.glotta.ntua.gr/Dialogos/Politics/1998_roberts.html

  • Royal Yachting Association. (n.d.). Youth beginners' courses. Retrieved September 19, 2012, from http://www.rya.org.uk/coursestraining/courses/dinghymultikeel/Pages/youthbeginners.aspx

  • Scouts. (2013). World organisation of the scout movement. Retrieved September 29, 2013, from http://www.scout.org/en/about_scouting/facts_figures/history/milestones_of_world_scouting

  • Shusterman, R. (2008). Body consciousness: a philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2012). Thinking through the body. Essays in somaesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. (2013). The growing child: laying the foundations of active learning and physical health. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, T. (1980). Significant life experiences. Journal of Environmental Education., 11(4), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovey, H. (2007). Playing outdoors: Spaces and places, risks and challenge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Wood, E. (2009). Developing a pedagogy of play. In A. Anning, J. Cullen, & M. Fleer Early (Eds.), Childhood education: Society and culture (2nd ed., pp. 27–38). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. (2010). Developing integrated pedagogical approaches to play and learning. In P. Broadhead, J. Howard, & E. Wood (Eds.), Play and learning in the early years: From research to practice (pp. 9–26). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Leather.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leather, M. A critique of “Forest School” or something lost in translation. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 21, 5–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0006-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0006-1

Keywords

Navigation