Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-active Control to Reduce Lateral Vibration of Passenger Rail Vehicle Using Disturbance Rejection and Continuous State Damper Controllers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this paper, Bouc–Wen type magnetorheological fluid damper has been used to monitor the ride quality of a prevailing rail vehicle in lateral vibrations.

Methods

Modelling of the rail vehicle is done in such a manner that it has an entire 9 degrees of freedom by significant considerations of lateral, roll and yaw motions of the car body, rear, and the front chassis. 200 km/h is considered as train speed for tracks with two varying disturbances. A system consisting of multibody in VI-rail software is provided by a track input and ergo, wheel response it obtained. SIMULINK (software) is responsible for the representation of the motions of the wheel as mathematical models. Two different types of analysis are done firstly with conventional passive lateral damper and secondly with semi-active MR lateral damper in subordinate suspension. To diminish lateral vibrations, the disturbance refusal and non-stop state controller algorithms were executed to manage the damper force.

Results

Results acquired are in the form of acceleration and displacement of the center of mass of the body under consideration is done by comparing in terms of reduction indices of their vibrations. A significant improvement in the index is seen in which a semi-active lateral damper is mounted.

Conclusions

The results show that the proposed system significantly improves both, the vibration attenuation ability and the ride quality of the vehicle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharma SK, Kumar A (2016) The impact of a rigid-flexible system on the ride quality of passenger bogies using a flexible car body. In: Pombo J (ed) Proceedings of third international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance, Stirlingshire, 5–8 April 2016. Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, p 87. https://doi.org/10.4203/ccp.110.87

  2. Sharma SK, Sharma RC, Kumar A, Palli S (2015) Challenges in rail vehicle-track modelling and simulation. Int J Veh Struct Syst 7(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.7.1.01

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goodall R (1999) Tilting trains and beyond-the future for active railway suspensions. Part 1 Improving passenger comfort. Comput Control Eng J 10(4):159–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma SK, Kumar A (2018) Impact of longitudinal train dynamics on train operations: a simulation-based study. J Vib Eng Technol 6(3):197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-018-0033-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma SK, Kumar A (2017) Impact of electric locomotive traction of the passenger vehicle ride quality in longitudinal train dynamics in the context of Indian railways. Mech Ind 18(2):222. https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2016047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Palli S, Koona R, Sharma SK, Sharma RC (2018) A review on dynamic analysis of rail vehicle coach. Int J Veh Struct Syst 10(3):204–211. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.10.3.10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma RC, Sharma SK, Palli S (2018) Rail vehicle modelling and simulation using lagrangian method. Int J Veh Struct Syst 10(3):188–194. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.10.3.07

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma SK, Sharma RC (2018) simulation of quarter-car model with magnetorheological dampers for ride quality improvement. Int J Veh Struct Syst 10(3):169–173. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.10.3.03

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma SK, Kumar A (2018) Disturbance rejection and force-tracking controller of nonlinear lateral vibrations in passenger rail vehicle using magnetorheological fluid damper. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 29(2):279–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X17721051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Prabakar RS, Sujatha C, Narayanan S (2014) Response of a half-car model with optimal magnetorheological damper parameters. J Vib Control 22(3):784–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546314532300

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma SK, Kumar A (2016) Dynamics analysis of wheel rail contact using FEA. Procedia Eng 144:1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma SK, Kumar A, Sharma RC (2014) Challenges in railway vehicle modelling and simulations. In: International conference on newest drift in mechanical engineering, December 20–21. Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana, pp 453–459

  13. Sharma SK, Kumar A (2014) A comparative study of Indian and Worldwide railways. Int J Mech Eng Robot Res 1(1):114–120

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma SK, Lavania S (2013) An autonomous metro: design and execution. Future trends in mechanical and industrial engineering. JECRC UDML College of Engineering, Jaipur

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Neill HR, Wale GD (1994) Semi-active suspension improves rail vehicle ride. Comput Control Eng J 5(4):183–188. https://doi.org/10.1049/cce:19940404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma RC, Sharma SK (2018) Sensitivity analysis of three-wheel vehicle’s suspension parameters influencing ride behavior. Noise Vib Worldw 49(7–8):272–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957456518796846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang J, Huang Q, Li W (2006) A bench study on lateral semi-active control system for high-speed railway vehicle. In: IEEE international conference on mechatronics automation, June 25–28, Luoyang, p 1335–1339

  18. Harun MH, Zailimi WM, Jamaluddin H, Rahman RA, Hudha K (2014) Dynamic response of commuter rail vehicle under lateral track irregularity. Appl Mech Mater 548–549:948–952. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.548-549.948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gatimaan Express. Wikipedia 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatimaan_Express#cite_note-3. Accessed 28 July 2016

  20. Sharma SK (2018) Multibody analysis of longitudinal train dynamics on the passenger ride performance due to brake application. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multi-Body Dyn 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464419318788775

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma SK, Kumar A (2018) Ride comfort of a higher speed rail vehicle using a magnetorheological suspension system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multi-Body Dyn 232(1):32–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464419317706873

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma SK, Sharma RC (2018) An investigation of a locomotive structural crashworthiness using finite element simulation. SAE Int J Commer Veh 11(4):235–244. https://doi.org/10.4271/02-11-04-0019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma RC, Palli S, Sharma SK, Roy M (2017) Modernization of railway track with composite sleepers. Int J Veh Struct Syst 9(5):321–329. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.9.5.10

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma SK, Kumar A (2017) Ride performance of a high-speed rail vehicle using controlled semi active suspension system. Smart Mater Struct 26(5):055026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa68f7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. MATLAB (2015) MATLAB and Simulink R2015b. MathWorks, Inc 2015. ‘MATLAB and Simulink R2015b’

  26. Lau YK, Liao WH (2005) Design and analysis of magnetorheological dampers for train suspension. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 219:261–276. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440905X8899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guangqiang Y (2001) Large-scale magnetorheological fluid damper for vibration mitigation: modelling, testing and control. Notre Dame, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  28. VI-Rail (2016) VI-grade engineering software & services. VI-Rail 16.0 documentation. Technical report, VI-grade GmbH, Marburg, Germany

  29. Kumar A (2015) Operation of BG EOG type LHB AC chair cars (LWFCZAC) and (LWSCZAC) fitted with FIAT bogies upto maximum speed of 160 kmph on track maintained to C&M-1, vol 1. Standards on New Delhi-Palwal (Incl.) section on UP and DN lines of Northern Railway. Railway Board Ministry of Railways Government of India, New Delhi

  30. Kumar A (2000) Oscillation trails on LHB coach (AC chair car) in Palwal-Mathura section of central railway upto a maximum test speed of 180 KMPH on Rajdhani track maintained to standards laid down. Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kulkarni D, Sharma SK, Kumar A (2016) Finite element analysis of a fishplate rail joint due to wheel impact. In: International conference on advanced dynamics and vibration control. National Institute of Technology, Durgapur

  32. Sharma SK, Chaturvedi S (2016) Jerk analysis in rail vehicle dynamics. Perspect Sci 8:648–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.06.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil Kumar Sharma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, S.K., Saini, U. & Kumar, A. Semi-active Control to Reduce Lateral Vibration of Passenger Rail Vehicle Using Disturbance Rejection and Continuous State Damper Controllers. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 7, 117–129 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00088-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00088-2

Keywords

Navigation