Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis model for the temperature and residual stress of tunnel liner exposed to fire

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The temperature and stress analysis of tunnel liner is the basis of the damage assessment of the tunnel, and it is also have a great significance to tunnel fire protection design. In this study, a thermo-mechanical coupling model is derived to study the temperature and stresses of tunnel liner under the RABT fire curve. In contrast to consideration the effects of flame impingement on the heated surface only, the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) of the heated surface of tunnel liner is considered in the proposed model. The applicability of theoretical method is verified by comparing with the fire tests. According to maximum temperature experienced and material degradation, the residual stress of tunnel liner after fire is discussed, which could provide the basic for the damage assessment after fire. Contributions of the HTC of tunnel liner on the temperature and stresses were quantitatively described. This theoretical model explains the temperature and residual stress evolution of tunnel liner under fire when considering the effect of HTC, which provides a theoretical basis for the tunnel fire proofing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beard AN. Fire safety in tunnels. Fire Safety J. 2009;44:276–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khoury GA. Effect of fire on concrete and concrete structures. Prog Struct Eng Mat. 2000;2(4):429–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dorgarten HW, Balthaus H, et al. Fire-resistant tunnel construction: results of fire behaviour tests and criteria of application. Tunn Under Space Tech. 2004;19(4–5):314.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vuilleumier F, Weatherill A, Crausaz B. Safety aspects of railway and road tunnel: example of the lötschberg railway tunnel and Mont-Blanc road tunnel. Tunn Under Space Tech. 2002;17(2):153–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Qiao RJ, Shao ZS, Wei W, et al. Theoretical investigation into the thermo-mechanical behaviours of tunnel lining during RABT fire development. Arab J Sci Eng. 2019;44(5):4807–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu K, Shao ZS, Qin S. An analytical design method for ductile support structures in squeezing tunnels. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2020;20(3):91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JHJ, Lim YM, Won JP, et al. Fire resistant behavior of newly developed bottom-ash-based cementations coating applied concrete tunnel lining under RABT fire loading. Constr Build Mater. 2010;24(10):1984–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Steau E, Mahendran M, et al. Experimental study of fire resistant board configurations under standard fire conditions. Fire Safety J. 2020;116:103153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomar MS, Khurana S. Impact of passive fire protection on heat release rates in road tunnel fire: a review. Tunn Under Space Tech. 2019;85:149–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bastami M, Aslani F, Omran M. High-temperature mechanical properties of concrete. Mat Sci Eng A. 2010;8(4):337–51.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kodur V, Khaliq W. Effect of temperature on thermal properties of different types of high-strength concrete. J Mater Civil Eng. 2011;23(6):793–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weerasinghe P, Nguyen K, Mendis P, et al. Large-scale experiment on the behaviour of concrete flat slabs subjected to standard fire. J Build Eng. 2020;30:101255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wei W, Shao ZS, Zhang YY, et al. Fundamentals and applications of microwave energy in rock and concrete processing—a review. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;157:113751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan ZG, Zhu HH, Ju JW, et al. Full-scale fire tests of RC metro shield TBM tunnel linings. Constr Build Mater. 2012;36:484–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakkas K, Vagiokas N, Tsiamouras K, et al. In-situ fire test to assess tunnel lining fire resistance. Tunn Under Space Tech. 2019;85:368–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gawin D, Pesavento F, Castells AG. On reliable predicting risk and nature of thermal spalling in heated concrete. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2018;18(4):1219–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peng GF, Yang WW, Zhao J, et al. Explosive spalling and residual mechanical properties of fiber-toughened high-performance concrete subjected to high temperatures. Cement Concrete Res. 2006;36(4):723–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Han CG, Hwang YS, Yang SH, et al. Performance of spalling resistance of high performance concrete with polypropylene fiber contents and lateral confinement. Cement Concrete Res. 2005;35(9):1747–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Savov K, Lackner R, Mang HA. Stability assessment of shallow tunnels subjected to fire load. Fire Safety J. 2005;40(8):745–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Caner A, Zlatanic S, Munfah N. Structural fire performance of concrete and shotcrete tunnel liners. J Struct Eng. 2005;131(12):1920–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feist C, Aschaber M, Hofstetter G. Numerical simulation of the load-carrying behavior of RC tunnel structures exposed to fire. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2009;45:958–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeiml M, Lackner R, Pesavento F, et al. Thermo-hydro-chemical couplings considered in safety assessment of shallow tunnels subjected to fire load. Fire Safety J. 2008;43(2):83–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li X, Li R, Schrefler BA. A coupled chemo-thermo-hygro-mechanical model of concrete at high temperature and failure analysis. Int J Numer Anal Met. 2006;30(7):635–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Buratti NB, Ferracuti MS. Concrete crack reduction in tunnel linings by steel fibre-reinforced concretes. Constr Build Mater. 2013;44:249–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sinaie S, Heidarpour A, Zhao XL. Effect of pre-induced cyclic damage on the mechanical properties of concrete exposed to elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater. 2016;112:867–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuan Y, Shao ZS, Qiao RJ, et al. Fracture behavior of concrete coarse aggregates under microwave irradiation influenced by mineral components. Constr Build Mater. 2021;286:122944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pichler C, Lackner R, Mang HA. Safety assessment of concrete tunnel linings under fire load. J Struct Eng. 2006;132(6):961–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qiao RJ, Shao ZS, Liu FY, et al. Damage evolution and safety assessment of tunnel lining subjected to long duration fire. Tunn Under Space Tech. 2019;83:354–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shao ZS, Wang TJ. Three-dimensional solutions for the stress fields in functionally graded cylindrical panel with finite length and subjected to thermal/mechanical loads. Int J Solids Struct. 2006;43(13):3856–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chang SH, Choi SW, Lee J. Determination of the combined heat transfer coefficient to simulate the fire-induced damage of a concrete tunnel lining under a severe fire condition. Tunn Under Space Tech. 2016;54:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Capua DD, Mari AR. Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete cross-sections exposed to fire. Fire Safety J. 2007;42(2):139–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Guo J, Jiang SP, Zhang ZY. Fire thermal stress and its damage to subsea immersed tunnel. Proc Eng. 2016;166:296–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Akbari H, Samano D, Mertol A, et al. The effect of variations in convection coefficients on thermal energy storage in buildings part I—interior partition walls. Energ Build. 1986;9(3):195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11872287), the China Postdoctoral Foundation Project (No. 2019M663934XB), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 2020JQ-662) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education (No. 20JK0708).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rujia Qiao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no potential conflict of interest involved in the present study.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

$$\Theta_{n} \left( \tau \right) = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{m} {\left[ {\frac{1}{(m - k)!}\mathop {\lim }\limits_{{s \to s_{1} }} \frac{{d^{k - 1} }}{{ds^{k - 1} }}\left[ {\left( {s - s_{1} } \right)^{m} \frac{M(s)}{{W(s)}}} \right]e^{s\tau } \tau^{m - k} } \right]} {\kern 1pt} + \sum\limits_{k = m + 1}^{K} {\frac{{M(s_{k} )}}{{\left[ {{{dW(s)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{dW(s)} {ds}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {ds}}} \right]_{{s = s_{k} }} }}e^{{s_{k} \tau }} } ,$$

\({\text{where}}\,M\left( s \right) = s^{{2}} \cdot \left( {d_{11} d_{22} - d_{12} d_{21} } \right);\)\(M\left( s \right)\,\, = \,\,\left( {sd_{{{1}2}} \left( s \right)H_{2} \Phi_{b} - d_{22} (s)H_{1} \frac{{\Phi_{a} }}{{\tau_{1} }}} \right)g_{n} (s) + \left( {d_{21} (s)H_{1} \frac{{\Phi_{a} }}{{\tau_{1} }} - sd_{11} (s)H_{2} \Phi_{b} } \right)j_{n} (s);\)\(d_{{{1}1}} \left( s \right)\,{ = }\,\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty } {\left[ {g_{n} \left( s \right)n\left( {R - 1} \right)^{n - 1} } \right]} - H_{1} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {\left[ {g_{n} \left( s \right)\left( {R - 1} \right)^{n} } \right]} ;\)

\(d_{12} \left( s \right)\,{ = }\,\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty } {\left[ {j_{n} \left( s \right)n\left( {R - 1} \right)^{n - 1} } \right]} - H_{1} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {\left[ {j_{n} \left( s \right)\left( {R - 1} \right)^{n} } \right]} ;\)

\(d_{21} \left( s \right)\,{ = }\,\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty } {\left[ {g_{n} \left( s \right)n\left( {R - 1} \right)^{n - 1} } \right]} + H_{2} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {\left[ {g_{n} \left( s \right)\left( {R - 1} \right)^{n} } \right]} ;\)

\(d_{22} \left( s \right)\,{ = }\,\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty } {\left[ {j_{n} \left( s \right)n\left( {R - 1} \right)^{n - 1} } \right]} + H_{2} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {\left[ {j_{n} \left( s \right)\left( {R - 1} \right)^{n} } \right]} .\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, R., Shao, Z., Yuan, Y. et al. An analysis model for the temperature and residual stress of tunnel liner exposed to fire. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 21, 158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00305-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00305-4

Keywords

Navigation