Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding streambeds as complex systems: review of multiple interacting environmental processes influencing streambed permeability

  • Overview Article
  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The permeability of sediments at the sediment–water interface is an important control on several stream ecosystem services. It is well known that streambed permeability varies over several orders of magnitude, however, the environmental processes influencing this variation have received little attention. This review synthesizes the state-of-art knowledge and gaps in our understanding of the key physical and biological processes which can potentially modify the streambed permeability. These processes include—(a) physical clogging due to fine sediments, (b) biological clogging due to microbial biomass, and (c) sediment reworking by in-stream fauna. We highlight that the role of biotic processes (bioclogging and sediment reworking processes) in modifying the streambed permeability has not been investigated in detail. We emphasize that complex feedback mechanisms exist between these abiotic and biotic processes, and an interdisciplinary framework is necessary to achieve a holistic understanding of the spatio-temporal variability in streambed permeability. To this end, we propose to develop a conceptual model for streambed evolution after a disturbance (e.g. floods) as this model could be valuable in comprehending the dynamics of permeability. We also outline the challenges associated with developing a widely applicable streambed evolution model. Nonetheless, as a way forward, we present a possible scenario for the evolution of a streambed following a high flow event based on the trajectory of responses of the above-mentioned environmental processes. Finally, we suggest future research directions that could assist in improving the fundamental understanding of the clogging and sediment reworking processes and consequently of the dynamics of streambed permeability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anschutz P, Ciutat A, Lecroart P, Gérino M, Boudou A (2012) Effects of tubificid worm bioturbation on freshwater sediment biogeochemistry. Aquat Geochem 18:475–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arango CP, James PW, Hatch KB (2015) Rapid ecosystem response to restoration in an urban stream. Hydrobiologia 749:197–211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aslan A, Autin WJ (1999) Evolution of the Holocene Mississippi River floodplain, Ferriday, Louisiana: insights on the origin of fine-grained floodplains. J Sediment Res 69:800–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen I, Andersen TJ, Edelvang K (1999) The influence of benthic diatoms and invertebrates on the erodibility of an intertidal mudflat, the Danish Wadden Sea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 49:99–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bardini L, Boano F, Cardenas MB, Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2012) Nutrient cycling in bedform induced hyporheic zones. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 84:47–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barlocher F, Murdoch JH (1989) Hyporheic biofilms—a potential food source for interstitial animals. Hydrobiologia 184:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Battersby N, Stewart D, Sharma A (1985) Microbiological problems in the offshore oil and gas industries. J Appl Microbiol 59:227–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Battin T, Sengschmitt D (1999) Linking sediment biofilms, hydrodynamics, and river bed clogging: evidence from a large river. Microb Ecol 37:185–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baveye P, Vandevivere P, Hoyle BL, DeLeo PC, de Lozada DS (1998) Environmental impact and mechanisms of the biological clogging of saturated soils and aquifer materials. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 28:123–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke AP, Steiner KH, Schmalfuss R, Gutknecht D, Sengschmitt D (2003) Clogging processes in hyporheic interstices of an impounded river, the Danube at Vienna, Austria. Int Rev Hydrobiol 88:397–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Boano F, Camporeale C, Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2006) Sinuosity-driven hyporheic exchange in meandering rivers. Geophys Res Lett 33:L18406

    Google Scholar 

  • Boano F, Harvey JW, Marion A, Packman AI, Revelli R, Ridolfi L, Wörman A (2014) Hyporheic flow and transport processes: Mechanisms, models, and biogeochemical implications. Rev Geophys 52:603–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeker C, Geist J (2016) Lampreys as ecosystem engineers: burrows of Eudontomyzon sp. and their impact on physical, chemical, and microbial properties in freshwater substrates. Hydrobiologia 777:171–181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton A (1993) Stream ecology and surface-hyporheic hydrologic exchange: implications, techniques and limitations. Mar Freshw Res 44:553–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton A, Valett H, Fisher S (1992) Spatial distribution and taxonomic composition of the hyporheos of several Sonoran Desert streams. Arch Hydrobiol 125:37–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer H (2002) Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering. Hydrogeol J 10:121–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs MA, Lautz LK, Buckley SF, Lane JW (2014) Practical limitations on the use of diurnal temperature signals to quantify groundwater upwelling. J Hydrol 519:1739–1751

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruder A, Tonolla D, Schweizer SP, Vollenweider S, Langhans SD, Wüest A (2016) A conceptual framework for hydropeaking mitigation. Sci Total Environ 568:1204–1212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunke M (1999) Colmation and depth filtration within streambeds: retention of particles in hyporheic interstices. Int Rev Hydrobiol 84:99–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brunke M, Gonser T (1997) The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshw Biol 37:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno MC, Maiolini B, Carolli M, Silveri L (2010) Short time-scale impacts of hydropeaking on benthic invertebrates in an Alpine stream (Trentino, Italy). Limnologica 40:281–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder BK, Grant GE, Haggerty R, Khangaonkar T, Wampler PJ (2008) Influence of hyporheic flow and geomorphology on temperature of a large, gravel-bed river, Clackamas River, Oregon, USA. Hydrol Process 22:941–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas MB, Zlotnik VA (2003) Three-dimensional model of modern channel bend deposits. Water Resour Res 39:1141

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale B, Gelmann E, Palmer M (2004) Net spinning caddisflies as stream ecosystem engineers: the influence of Hydropsyche on benthic substrate stability. Funct Ecol 18:381–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Mulet R, Alfredsen KT, McCluskey AH, Stewardson MJ (2017) Key hydraulic drivers and patterns of fine sediment accumulation in gravel streambeds: a conceptual framework illustrated with a case study from the Kiewa River, Australia. Geomorphology 299:152–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Mulet R, Lakhanpal G, Stewardson MJ (2018) The relative contribution of near-bed vs. intragravel horizontal transport to fine sediment accumulation processes in river gravel beds. Geomorphology 303:299–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2011) Depth-dependent hydraulic conductivity distribution patterns of a streambed. Hydrol Process 25:278–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X et al (2017) Hindered erosion: The biological mediation of non-cohesive sediment behaviour. Water Resour Res 53:4787–4801

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen-Charpentier BM, Dimitrov DT, Kojouharov HV (2009) Numerical simulation of multi-species biofilms in porous media for different kinetics. Math Comput Simulat 79:1846–1861

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C, Song J, Chen X, Wang D (2011) Statistical distribution of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity along the Platte River, Nebraska. Water Resour Manag 25:265–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JM (1969) Brahmaputra River: channel processes and sedimentation. Sediment Geol 3:129–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantz J, Herkelrath W, Murphy F (1988) Air encapsulation during infiltration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Corapcioglu MY, Haridas A (1984) Transport and fate of microorganisms in porous media: a theoretical investigation. J Hydrol 72:149–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp D, Carling P (1989) Observations on siting, dimensions and structure of salmonid redds. J Fish Biol 34:119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y, Wooster JK, Baker PF, Dusterhoff SR, Sklar LS, Dietrich WE (2008) Theory of fine sediment infiltration into immobile gravel bed. J Hydraul Eng 134:1421–1429

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham A, Anderson C, Bouwer H (1987) Effects of sediment-laden flow on channel bed clogging. J Irrig Drain Eng 113:106–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham AB, Characklis WG, Abedeen F, Crawford D (1991) Influence of biofilm accumulation on porous media hydrodynamics. Environ Sci Technol 25:1305–1311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Datry T, Lamouroux N, Thivin G, Descloux S, Baudoin JM (2015) Estimation of sediment hydraulic conductivity in river reaches and its potential use to evaluate streambed clogging. River Res Appl 31:880–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis WR (1993) The role of bioturbation in sediment resuspension and its interaction with physical shearing. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 171:187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • De Backer A, Van Coillie F, Montserrat F, Provoost P, Van Colen C, Vincx M, Degraer S (2011) Bioturbation effects of Corophium volutator: importance of density and behavioural activity. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 91:306–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Descloux S, Datry T, Philippe M, Marmonier P (2010) Comparison of different techniques to assess surface and subsurface streambed colmation with fine sediments. Int Rev Hydrobiol 95:520–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Descloux S, Datry T, Marmonier P (2013) Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate assemblages along a gradient of increasing streambed colmation by fine sediment. Aquat Sci 75:493–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz J, Rendueles M, Díaz M (2010) Straining phenomena in bacteria transport through natural porous media. Environ Sci Pollut 17:400–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Hutson RE, Eichem AC, Evans MA, Gudder DA, Fritz KM, Gray L (1996) The relationship of floods, drying, flow and light to primary production and producer biomass in a prairie stream. Hydrobiologia 333:151–159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Gido K, Whiles MR, Fritz KM, Matthews WJ (2004) Life on the edge: the ecology of Great Plains prairie streams. Bioscience 54:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole-Olivier MJ, Marmonier P, Beffy JL (1997) Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbance: is the hyporheic zone a patchy refugium? Freshw Biol 37:257–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Droppo IG (2009) Biofilm structure and bed stability of five contrasting freshwater sediments. Mar Freshw Res 60:690–699

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Droppo I, Lau Y, Mitchell C (2001) The effect of depositional history on contaminated bed sediment stability. Sci Total Environ 266:7–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Droppo IG, Ross N, Skafel M, Liss SN (2007) Biostabilization of cohesive sediment beds in a freshwater wave-dominated environment. Limnol Oceanogr 52:577–589

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dudill A, Frey P, Church M (2017) Infiltration of fine sediment into a coarse mobile bed: a phenomenological study. Earth Surf Proc Land 42:1171–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley-Southern M, Binley A (2015) Temporal responses of groundwater-surface water exchange to successive storm events. Water Resour Res 51:1112–1126

    Google Scholar 

  • Duport E, Stora G, Tremblay P, Gilbert F (2006) Effects of population density on the sediment mixing induced by the gallery-diffusor Hediste (Nereis) diversicolor OF Müller, 1776. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 336:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein HA (1968) Deposition of suspended particles in a gravel bed. J Hydraul Eng 94:1197–1206

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang H, Lai H, Cheng W, Huang L, He G (2017) Modeling sediment transport with an integrated view of the biofilm effects. Water Resour Res 53:7536–7557

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas A, Erratico C, Vigano L (2007) Assessment of the environmental significance of heavy metal pollution in surficial sediments of the River Po. Chemosphere 68:761–768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer J, Holzner M, Plötze M, Furrer G (2017) Clogging of an Alpine streambed by silt-sized particles–Insights from laboratory and field experiments. Water Res 126:60–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay S (1995) Importance of surface-subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: The hyporheic zone. Limnol Oceanogr 40:159–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher SG, Gray LJ, Grimm NB, Busch DE (1982) Temporal succession in a desert stream ecosystem following flash flooding. Ecol Monogr 52:93–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox A, Boano F, Arnon S (2014) Impact of losing and gaining streamflow conditions on hyporheic exchange fluxes induced by dune-shaped bed forms. Water Resour Res 50:1895–1907

    Google Scholar 

  • Franken RJ, Storey RG, Williams DD (2001) Biological, chemical and physical characteristics of downwelling and upwelling zones in the hyporheic zone of a north-temperate stream. Hydrobiologia 444:183–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraterrigo JM, Rusak JA (2008) Disturbance-driven changes in the variability of ecological patterns and processes. Ecol Lett 11:756–770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz KM, Dodds WK (2004) Resistance and resilience of macroinvertebrate assemblages to drying and flood in a tallgrass prairie stream system. Hydrobiologia 527:99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway WE (1975) Process framework for describing the morphologic and stratigraphic evolution of deltaic depositional systems. In: Broussard, M.L. (Ed.) Deltas: models for exploration. pp 87–98

  • Genereux DP, Leahy S, Mitasova H, Kennedy CD, Corbett DR (2008) Spatial and temporal variability of streambed hydraulic conductivity in West Bear Creek, North Carolina, USA. J Hydrol 358:332–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbersdorf S, Wieprecht S (2015) Biostabilization of cohesive sediments: revisiting the role of abiotic conditions, physiology and diversity of microbes, polymeric secretion, and biofilm architecture. Geobiology 13:68–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins C, Vericat D, Batalla RJ, Gomez CM (2007) Shaking and moving: low rates of sediment transport trigger mass drift of stream invertebrates. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Giberson DJ, Hall RJ (1988) Seasonal variation in faunal distribution within the sediments of a Canadian Shield stream, with emphasis on responses to spring floods. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:1994–2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson S, Abraham D, Heath R, Schoellhamer D (2009a) Bridging process threshold for sediment infiltrating into a coarse substrate. J Geotech Geoenviron 136:402–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson S, Abraham D, Heath R, Schoellhamer D (2009b) Vertical gradational variability of fines deposited in a gravel framework. Sedimentology 56:661–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottesfeld AS, Hassan MA (2008) Tunnicliffe J Salmon bioturbation and stream process. In: American Fisheries Society Symposium, pp 175–193

  • Gottesfeld AS, Hassan MA, Tunnicliffe JF, Poirier RW (2004) Sediment dispersion in salmon spawning streams: the influence of floods and salmon redd construction. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40:1071–1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock PJ (2002) Human impacts on the stream–groundwater exchange zone. Environ Manage 29:763–781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hand VL, Lloyd JR, Vaughan DJ, Wilkins MJ, Boult S (2008) Experimental studies of the influence of grain size, oxygen availability and organic carbon availability on bioclogging in porous media. Environ Sci Technol 42:1485–1491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig M, Borchardt D (2015) Alteration of key hyporheic functions through biological and physical clogging along a nutrient and fine-sediment gradient. Ecohydrology 8:961–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch CE, Fisher AT, Ruehl CR, Stemler G (2010) Spatial and temporal variations in streambed hydraulic conductivity quantified with time-series thermal methods. J Hydrol 389:276–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer C, Holzapfel P, Tonolla D, Habersack H, Zolezzi G (2019) In situ measurements of fine sediment infiltration (FSI) in gravel-bed rivers with a hydropeaking flow regime. Earth Surf Proc Land 44:433–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilskov AC, Holmer M (2001) Effects of benthic fauna on organic matter mineralization in fish-farm sediments: importance of size and abundance. ICES J Mar Sci 58:427–434

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero A, Berni C, Camenen B (2015) Laboratory analysis on silt infiltration into a gravel bed In: 36th IAHR World Congress.

  • Hester E, Doyle M (2006) Impact of in-channel geomorphic structures on surface-subsurface exchange of water and heat in streams. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.

  • Huston DL, Fox JF (2015) Clogging of fine sediment within gravel substrates: dimensional analysis and macroanalysis of experiments in hydraulic flumes. J Hydraul Eng 141:04015015

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong HY, Jun S-C, Cheon J-Y, Park M (2018) A review on clogging mechanisms and managements in aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) applications. Geosci J 22:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Chen Y, Tang H, Zhang P, Li L, Barry DA (2019a) Interplay of hyporheic exchange and fine particle deposition in a riverbed. Adv Water Resour 128:145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Zhang Z, Tang H, Xiaoquan Y, Li L, Barry DA (2019b) Colloid transport and distribution in the hyporheic zone. Hydrol Process 33:932–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman MH, Cardenas MB, Buttles J, Kessler AJ, Cook PL (2017) Hyporheic hot moments: dissolved oxygen dynamics in the hyporheic zone in response to surface flow perturbations. Water Resour Res 53:6642–6662

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khullar N, Kothyari U, Raju KR (2013) Study of deposition of fine sediment within the pores of a coarse sediment bed stream. Int J Sediment Res 28:210–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Kildsgaard J, Engesgaard P (2002) Tracer tests and image analysis of biological clogging in a two-dimensional sandbox experiment. Groundwater Monit Remediat 22:60–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen E, Penha-Lopes G, Delefosse M, Valdemarsen T, Quintana CO, Banta GT (2012) What is bioturbation? The need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 446:285–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake P (2000) Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:573–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Landon MK, Rus DL, Harvey FE (2001) Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy streambeds. Groundwater 39:870–885

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lauck T (1991) A simulation model for the infiltration of sediment into spawning gravel. Humboldt State University

  • Leek R, Wu JQ, Wang L, Hanrahan TP, Barber ME, Qiu H (2009) Heterogeneous characteristics of streambed saturated hydraulic conductivity of the Touchet River, south eastern Washington, USA. Hydrol Process 23:1236–1246

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy J, Birck MD, Mutiti S, Kilroy KC, Windeler B, Idris O, Allen LN (2011) The impact of storm events on a riverbed system and its hydraulic conductivity at a site of induced infiltration. J Environ Manage 92:1960–1971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski J, Hupfer M (2005) Effect of macrozoobenthos on two-dimensional small-scale heterogeneity of pore water phosphorus concentrations in lake sediments: A laboratory study. Limnol Oceanogr 50:1106–1118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski J et al (2019) Is the hyporheic zone relevant beyond the scientific community? Water 11:2230

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lisle TE (1989) Sediment transport and resulting deposition in spawning gravels, north coastal California. Water Resour Res 25:1303–1319

    Google Scholar 

  • Loperfido J, Just CL, Papanicolaou AN, Schnoor JL (2010) In situ sensing to understand diel turbidity cycles, suspended solids, and nutrient transport in Clear Creek. Iowa Water Resour Res 46:W06525

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytle DA (2002) Flash floods and aquatic insect life-history evolution: evaluation of multiple models. Ecology 83:370–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Maire O, Lecroart P, Meysman F, Rosenberg R, Duchêne J-C, Grémare A (2008) Quantification of sediment reworking rates in bioturbation research: a review. Aquat Biol 2:219–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Malard F, Ferreira D, Dolédec S, Ward J (2003) Influence of groundwater upwelling on the distribution of the hyporheos in a headwater river flood plain. Arch Hydrobiol 157:89–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marinelli RL, Williams TJ (2003) Evidence for density-dependent effects of infauna on sediment biogeochemistry and benthic–pelagic coupling in nearshore systems. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 57:179–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marmonier P et al (2012) The role of organisms in hyporheic processes: gaps in current knowledge, needs for future research and applications. In: Annales de Limnologie-International Journal of Limnology, 2012. EDP Sciences, pp 253–266

  • Mathers KL, Hill MJ, Wood CD, Wood PJ (2019a) The role of fine sediment characteristics and body size on the vertical movement of a freshwater amphipod. Freshw Biol 64:152–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathers KL, Rice SP, Wood PJ (2019b) Discharge and suspended sediment time series as controls on fine sediment ingress into gravel river beds. CATENA 173:253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheswaran K, Blemmer M, Rosbjerg D, Boegh E (2014) Seasonal variations in groundwater upwelling zones in a Danish lowland stream analyzed using distributed temperature sensing (DTS). Hydrol Process 28:1422–1435

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauclaire L, Schürmann A, Mermillod-Blondin F (2006) Influence of hydraulic conductivity on communities of microorganisms and invertebrates in porous media: a case study in drinking water slow sand filters. Aquat Sci 68:100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch DL (1986) Benthic macroinvertebrate distributions in the riffle-pool communities of two east Texas streams. Hydrobiologia 135:61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan A, Joy M (2013) Responses of three PIT-tagged native fish species to floods in a small, upland stream in New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshwat Res 47:225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows P, Tait J (1989) Modification of sediment permeability and shear strength by two burrowing invertebrates. Mar Biol 101:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Lera C, Frossard A, Knie M, Federlein LL, Gessner MO, Mutz M (2017) Importance of advective mass transfer and sediment surface area for streambed microbial communities. Freshw Biol 62:133–145

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mermillod-Blondin F, Lemoine DG (2010) Ecosystem engineering by tubificid worms stimulates macrophyte growth in poorly oxygenated wetland sediments. Funct Ecol 24:444–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Mermillod-Blondin F, Rosenberg R (2006) Ecosystem engineering: the impact of bioturbation on biogeochemical processes in marine and freshwater benthic habitats. Aquat Sci 68:434–442

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mermillod-Blondin F, Gérino M, Degrange V, Lensi R, Chassé J-L, Rard M, Châtelliers MCd (2001) Testing the functional redundancy of Limnodrilus and Tubifex (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) in hyporheic sediments: an experimental study in microcosms. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1747–1759

    Google Scholar 

  • Mermillod-Blondin F, Gaudet JP, Gérino M, Desrosiers G, Creuzé des Châtelliers M (2003) Influence of macroinvertebrates on physico-chemical and microbial processes in hyporheic sediments. Hydrol Process 17:779–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Mermillod-Blondin F, Rosenberg R, François-Carcaillet F, Norling K, Mauclaire L (2004) Influence of bioturbation by three benthic infaunal species on microbial communities and biogeochemical processes in marine sediment. Aquat Microb Ecol 36:271–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud E, Desrosiers G, Mermillod-Blondin F, Sundby B, Stora G (2005) The functional group approach to bioturbation: the effects of biodiffusers and gallery-diffusers of the Macoma balthica community on sediment oxygen uptake. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 326:77–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud E, Desrosiers G, Mermillod-Blondin F, Sundby B, Stora G (2006) The functional group approach to bioturbation: II. The effects of the Macoma balthica community on fluxes of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon across the sediment–water interface. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 337:178–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AM, Robertson AL, McDermott MJ, Klaar MJ, Brown LE (2013) Major flood disturbance alters river ecosystem evolution. Nat Clim Chang 3:137–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Miqueleto A, Dolosic C, Pozzi E, Foresti E, Zaiat M (2010) Influence of carbon sources and C/N ratio on EPS production in anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 101:1324–1330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moldovan OT, Levei E (2015) Temporal variability of fauna and the importance of sampling frequency in the hyporheic zone. Hydrobiologia 755:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JW, Schindler DE, Carter JL, Fox J, Griffiths J, Holtgrieve GW (2007) Biotic control of stream fluxes: spawning salmon drive nutrient and matter export. Ecology 88:1278–1291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morad M, Khalili A, Roskosch A, Lewandowski J (2010) Quantification of pumping rate of Chironomus plumosus larvae in natural burrows. Aquat Ecol 44:143–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz M, Rohde A (2003) Processes of surface-subsurface water exchange in a low energy sand-bed stream. Int Rev Hydrobiol 88:290–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Navel S, Mermillod-Blondin F, Montuelle B, Chauvet E, Marmonier P (2012) Sedimentary context controls the influence of ecosystem engineering by bioturbators on microbial processes in river sediments. Oikos 121:1134–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer ME et al (2016) Simulating bioclogging effects on dynamic riverbed permeability and infiltration. Water Resour Res 52:2883–2900

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogaro G, Mermillod-Blondin F, François-Carcaillet F, Gaudet JP, Lafont M, Gibert J (2006) Invertebrate bioturbation can reduce the clogging of sediment: an experimental study using infiltration sediment columns. Freshw Biol 51:1458–1473

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogaro G, Datry T, Mermillod-Blondin F, Descloux S, Montuelle B (2010) Influence of streambed sediment clogging on microbial processes in the hyporheic zone. Freshw Biol 55:1288–1302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ongley E, Krishnappan B, Droppo G, Rao S, Maguire R (1992) Cohesive sediment transport: emerging issues for toxic chemical management. Hydrobiologia 235:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens P (2005) Conceptual models and budgets for sediment management at the river basin scale. J Soil Sediment 5:201–212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Packman AI, Bencala KE (2000) Modeling surface-subsurface hydrological interactions. In: J. B. Jones, & P. J. Mulholland (eds) Streams and Ground Waters. Academic Press, pp 45–80

  • Packman AI, Brooks NH, Morgan JJ (2000a) Kaolinite exchange between a stream and streambed: Laboratory experiments and validation of a colloid transport model. Water Resour Res 36:2363–2372

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Packman AI, Brooks NH, Morgan JJ (2000b) A physicochemical model for colloid exchange between a stream and a sand streambed with bed forms. Water Resour Res 36:2351–2361

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bely AE, Berg K (1992) Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbance: a test of the hyporheic refuge hypothesis. Oecologia 89:182–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G (1990) Surface-based bedload transport relation for gravel rivers. J Hydraul Res 28:417–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington D, Therrien R, Simmons CT, Brunner P (2017) Blueprint for a coupled model of sedimentology, hydrology, and hydrogeology in streambeds. Rev Geophys 55:287–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD, Van Dyke C (2016) Principles of geomorphic disturbance and recovery in response to storms. Earth Surf Proc Land 41:971–979

    Google Scholar 

  • Piqué G, Vericat D, Sabater S, Batalla RJ (2016) Effects of biofilm on river-bed scour. Sci Total Environ 572:1033–1046

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL et al (1997) The natural flow regime. Bioscience 47:769–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehg KJ, Packman AI, Ren J (2005) Effects of suspended sediment characteristics and bed sediment transport on streambed clogging. Hydrol Process 19:413–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisinger AJ, Rosi EJ, Bechtold HA, Doody TR, Kaushal SS, Groffman PM (2017) Recovery and resilience of urban stream metabolism following Superstorm Sandy and other floods. Ecosphere 8:e01776

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds W, Brown DA, Mathur S, Overend R (1992) Effect of in-situ gas accumulation on the hydraulic conductivity of peat. Soil Sci 153:397–408

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rice SP, Johnson MF, Mathers K, Reeds J, Extence C (2016) The importance of biotic entrainment for base flow fluvial sediment transport. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 121:890–906

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DC, Kaplan LA, Denis Newbold J, Aufdenkampe AK (2009) Temporal dynamics of seston: A recurring nighttime peak and seasonal shifts in composition in a stream ecosystem. Limnol Oceanogr 54:344–354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter A, Stoeckl K, Denic M, Geist J (2016) Association between the occurrence of the Thick-shelled River Mussel (Unio crassus) and macroinvertebrate, microbial, and diatom communities. Freshw Sci 35:922–933

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche K, Drummond J, Boano F, Packman A, Battin T, Hunter W (2017) Benthic biofilm controls on fine particle dynamics in streams. Water Resour Res 53:222–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskosch A, Morad MR, Khalili A, Lewandowski J (2010) Bioirrigation by Chironomus plumosus: advective flow investigated by particle image velocimetry. J N Am Benthol Soc 29:789–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskosch A, Hette N, Hupfer M, Lewandowski J (2012) Alteration of Chironomus plumosus ventilation activity and bioirrigation-mediated benthic fluxes by changes in temperature, oxygen concentration, and seasonal variations. Freshw Sci 31:269–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RJ, Boufadel MC (2006) Influence of streambed hydraulic conductivity on solute exchange with the hyporheic zone. Environ Geol 51:203–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakthivadivel R, Einstein HA (1970) Clogging of porous column of spheres by sediment. J Hydraul Eng 96:461–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Salehin M, Packman AI, Paradis M (2004) Hyporheic exchange with heterogeneous streambeds: Laboratory experiments and modeling. Water Resour Res 40:W11054

    Google Scholar 

  • Schälchli U (1992) The clogging of coarse gravel river beds by fine sediment. Hydrobiologia 235:189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt H, Thom M, King L, Wieprecht S, Gerbersdorf SU (2016) The effect of seasonality upon the development of lotic biofilms and microbial biostabilisation. Freshw Biol 61:963–978

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA, Ethridge FG (1994) Origin, evolution and morphology of fluvial valleys. In: R.W. Dalrymple, R.J. Boyd and B.A. Zaitlin (eds) Incised valley systems: Origin and sedimentary sequences. SEPM, Special Publication 51. pp 11–27

  • Schumm SA, Harvey MD, Watson CC (1984) Incised channels: morphology, dynamics, and control. Water Resources Publications, Littleton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebok E, Duque C, Engesgaard P, Boegh E (2015) Spatial variability in streambed hydraulic conductivity of contrasting stream morphologies: channel bend and straight channel. Hydrol Process 29:458–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert D, Engesgaard P (2007) Use of tracer tests to investigate changes in flow and transport properties due to bioclogging of porous media. J Contam Hydrol 93:58–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seki K, Miyazaki T, Nakano M (1998) Effects of microorganisms on hydraulic conductivity decrease in infiltration. Eur J Soil Sci 49:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen H, Jiang G, Wan X, Li H, Qiao Y, Thrush S, He P (2017) Response of the microbial community to bioturbation by benthic macrofauna on intertidal flats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 488:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd RG (1989) Correlations of permeability and grain size. Groundwater 27:633–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon A (1989) A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surf Proc Land 14:11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Rinaldi M (2006) Disturbance, stream incision, and channel evolution: The roles of excess transport capacity and boundary materials in controlling channel response. Geomorphology 79:361–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson SC, Meixner T (2012) Modeling effects of floods on streambed hydraulic conductivity and groundwater-surface water interactions. Water Resour Res 48:W02515

    Google Scholar 

  • Solan M, Herringshaw LG (2008) Bioturbation in aquatic environments: linking past and present. Aquat Biol 2:201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Chen X, Cheng C (2010) Observation of bioturbation and hyporheic flux in streambeds. Front Environ Sci Eng 4:340–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Song J et al (2016) Heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity and Darcian flux in the submerged streambed and adjacent exposed stream bank of the Beiluo River, northwest China. Hydrogeol J 24:2049–2062

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewardson M, Datry T, Lamouroux N, Pella H, Thommeret N, Valette L, Grant S (2016) Variation in reach-scale hydraulic conductivity of streambeds. Geomorphology 259:70–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey RG, Williams DD (2004) Spatial responses of hyporheic invertebrates to seasonal changes in environmental parameters. Freshw Biol 49:1468–1486

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland T, Grant J, Amos C (1998) The effect of carbohydrate production by the diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the erodibility of sediment. Limnol Oceanogr 43:65–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SW, Jaffé PR (1990) Substrate and biomass transport in a porous medium. Water Resour Res 26:2181–2194

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom M, Schmidt H, Gerbersdorf SU, Wieprecht S (2015) Seasonal biostabilization and erosion behavior of fluvial biofilms under different hydrodynamic and light conditions. Int J Sediment Res 30:273–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrush SF, Hewitt JE, Gibbs M, Lundquist C, Norkko A (2006) Functional role of large organisms in intertidal communities: community effects and ecosystem function. Ecosystems 9:1029–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Thullner M (2010) Comparison of bioclogging effects in saturated porous media within one-and two-dimensional flow systems. Ecol Eng 36:176–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonina D, de Barros FP, Marzadri A, Bellin A (2016) Does streambed heterogeneity matter for hyporheic residence time distribution in sand-bedded streams? Adv Water Resour 96:120–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tufenkji N (2007) Modeling microbial transport in porous media: Traditional approaches and recent developments. Adv Water Resour 30:1455–1469

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood GJ, Boulcott M, Raines CA, Waldron K (2004) Environmental effects on exopolymer production by marine benthic diatoms: dynamics, changes in composition, and pathways of production. J Phycol 40:293–304

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vignaga E, Sloan DM, Luo X, Haynes H, Phoenix VR, Sloan WT (2013) Erosion of biofilm-bound fluvial sediments. Nat Geosci 6:770–774

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vu B, Chen M, Crawford RJ, Ivanova EP (2009) Bacterial extracellular polysaccharides involved in biofilm formation. Molecules 14:2535–2554

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JB (1990) Recovery of lotic macroinvertebrate communities from disturbance. Environ Manage 14:605–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward AS (2016) The evolution and state of interdisciplinary hyporheic research. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 3:83–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton G, Mohajeri SH, Righetti M (2017) The pernicious problem of streambed colmation: a multi-disciplinary reflection on the mechanisms, causes, impacts, and management challenges. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 4:e1231

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock PR, Barta AF, Shea CC, Kondolf GM, Matthews WG, Pitlick J (1996) Observations of flow and sediment entrainment on a large gravel-bed river. Water Resour Res 32:2897–2909

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood PJ, Armitage PD (1997) Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ Manage 21:203–217

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward G, Bonada N, Feeley HB, Giller PS (2015) Resilience of a stream community to extreme climatic events and long-term recovery from a catastrophic flood. Freshw Biol 60:2497–2510

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooster JK, Dusterhoff SR, Cui Y, Sklar LS, Dietrich WE, Malko M (2008) Sediment supply and relative size distribution effects on fine sediment infiltration into immobile gravels. Water Resour Res 44:W03424

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Gui S, Stahl P, Zhang R (1997) Experimental study on the reduction of soil hydraulic conductivity by enhanced biomass growth. Soil Sci 162:741–748

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, Shu L, Lu C, Chen X (2015) The heterogeneity of 3-D vertical hydraulic conductivity in a streambed. Hydrol Res 47:15–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Zheng X, Shao H, Xin J, Peng T (2014) Influences of environmental factors on bacterial extracellular polymeric substances production in porous media. J Hydrol 519:3153–3162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu G-a, Wang Z-y, Huang HQ, Liu H-x, Brendon B, Zhang K (2012) Bed load transport under different streambed conditions–a field experimental study in a mountain stream. Int J Sediment Res 27:426–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarnetske JP, Haggerty R, Wondzell SM, Baker MA (2011) Dynamics of nitrate production and removal as a function of residence time in the hyporheic zone. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 116:G01025

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer MA, Lautz LK (2014) Temporal and spatial response of hyporheic zone geochemistry to a storm event. Hydrol Process 28:2324–2337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Robert Payn whose suggestions have helped to improve the quality of this manuscript.

Funding

Shrivastava would like to acknowledge the Melbourne India Postgraduate Program (MIPP) for providing the scholarship to pursue PhD at the University of Melbourne. The project was also supported by the Australian Research Council (Project DP130103619).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The manuscript has been prepared as one of the outcomes of Shrivastava’s PhD work. He consolidated all the ideas and had drafted the manuscript. Stewardson and Arora helped in conceptualization and provided their suggestions as the manuscript was developed.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shivansh Shrivastava.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shrivastava, S., Stewardson, M.J. & Arora, M. Understanding streambeds as complex systems: review of multiple interacting environmental processes influencing streambed permeability. Aquat Sci 82, 67 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-00741-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-00741-z

Keywords

Navigation