Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Einfluss des operativen Zugangswegs auf die Prognose von Frauen mit frühem Zervixkarzinom

Impact of surgical approach on prognosis in early-stage cervical cancer

  • Literatur kommentiert
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Ramirez PT et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1806395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melamed A et al (2018) Survival after mini-mally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kokka F et al (2014) Surgical treatment of stage IA2 cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010870.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Baalbergen A et al (2013) Primary surgery versus primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for early adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006248.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Conrad LB et al (2015) Role of minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: an updated survey of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:1121–1127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Walker J et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27(32):5331–5336

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2017) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cervical cancer. Version I.2018 (http://oncolife.com.ua/doc/nccn/Cervical_Cancer.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider A, Köhler C (2015) Locoregional recurrence after total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. The vaginal cuff must be closed to avoid tumor cell contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hertel H et al (2003) Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 90(3):505–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pahisa J et al (2010) Comparative study of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and open Wertheim-Meigs in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: eleven years of experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(1):173–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Steed H et al (2004) A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 93(3):588–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nam JH et al (2004) Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 92(1):277–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee CL et al (2010) Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopically assisted radical hysterecomy in treating early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(2):165.e1–165.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lanowska et al (2014) Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (VALRH) versus laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) in the treatment of cervical cancer: surgical results and oncologic outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:1293–1300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Sauer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

G. Sauer, C. Kurzeder und A. Schneider geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

Originalpublikationen

Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895–1904. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1806395

Melamed A et al (2018) Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1905–1914. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804923

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sauer, G., Kurzeder, C. & Schneider, A. Einfluss des operativen Zugangswegs auf die Prognose von Frauen mit frühem Zervixkarzinom. Strahlenther Onkol 195, 274–276 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01426-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01426-9

Navigation