Literatur
Ramirez PT et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1806395
Melamed A et al (2018) Survival after mini-mally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804923
Kokka F et al (2014) Surgical treatment of stage IA2 cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010870.pub2
Baalbergen A et al (2013) Primary surgery versus primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for early adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006248.pub3
Conrad LB et al (2015) Role of minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: an updated survey of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:1121–1127
Walker J et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27(32):5331–5336
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2017) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cervical cancer. Version I.2018 (http://oncolife.com.ua/doc/nccn/Cervical_Cancer.pdf)
Schneider A, Köhler C (2015) Locoregional recurrence after total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. The vaginal cuff must be closed to avoid tumor cell contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:550
Hertel H et al (2003) Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 90(3):505–511
Pahisa J et al (2010) Comparative study of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and open Wertheim-Meigs in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: eleven years of experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(1):173–178
Steed H et al (2004) A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 93(3):588–593
Nam JH et al (2004) Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 92(1):277–283
Lee CL et al (2010) Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopically assisted radical hysterecomy in treating early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(2):165.e1–165.e7
Lanowska et al (2014) Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (VALRH) versus laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) in the treatment of cervical cancer: surgical results and oncologic outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:1293–1300
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
G. Sauer, C. Kurzeder und A. Schneider geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Additional information
Originalpublikationen
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895–1904. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1806395
Melamed A et al (2018) Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1905–1914. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804923
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sauer, G., Kurzeder, C. & Schneider, A. Einfluss des operativen Zugangswegs auf die Prognose von Frauen mit frühem Zervixkarzinom. Strahlenther Onkol 195, 274–276 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01426-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01426-9