Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability and potentially associated harms of emergency access to the femoral artery and vein in a sample of physicians working together in the emergency department of a level I trauma center. In addition, to investigate whether there are differences between participants in terms of different levels of training.
Methods
A sample of 36 orthopedic trauma and anesthesiology assistant doctors, specialists, and senior physician was recruited from the emergency room management at a level I trauma center in Graz, Austria. Emergency approach to the femoral vessels was performed on 33 fresh cadavers. Attention was paid to time, successful clamping of the vessels, self-assessment and learning curve.
Results
The approach was performed correctly in 97.2% (35/36) of all cases. 97.2% of all participants (35/36) were confident to perform the emergency access. They were proven right, since especially the resident and senior subgroups achieved satisfactory results concerning the correct performance of the approach to the femoral vessels as well as correct identification of the femoral artery and vein.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we evaluated the emergency access to the femoral artery (FA) and femoral vein (FV) as an easily teachable procedure including high success rates (correct performance in 97.2%).
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Asensio JA, Kuncir EJ, García-Núñez LM, Petrone P. Femoral vessel injuries: analysis of factors predictive of outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(4):512–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.020.
Ball CG, Nicol AJ, Beningfield SJ, Navsaria PH. Emergency room arteriography: an updated digital technology. Scand J Surg. 2007;96(1):67–71.
Cargile JS III, Hunt JL, Purdue GF. Acute trauma of the femoral artery and vein. J Trauma. 1992;32(3):364–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199203000-00015. (discussion 370-1).
Woodward EB, Clouse WD, Eliason JL, Peck MA, Bowser AN, Cox MW, Jones WT, Rasmussen TE. Penetrating femoropopliteal injury during modern warfare: experience of the Balad Vascular Registry. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(6):1259–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.052. (discussion 1264-5).
Brenner M, Teeter W, Hoehn M, Pasley J, Hu P, Yang S, Romagnoli A, Diaz J, Stein D, Scalea T. Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for proximal aortic control in patients with severe hemorrhage and arrest. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(2):130–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3549. (PMID: 28973104; PMCID: PMC5838921).
Rayamajhi S, Murugan N, Nicol A, Edu S, Klopper J, Naidoo N, Navsaria P. Penetrating femoral artery injuries: an urban trauma centre experience. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45(5):909–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0951-6.
Degiannis E, Levy RD, Velmahos GC, Potokar T, Saadia R. Penetrating injuries of the femoral artery. Br J Surg. 1995;82(4):492–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820420.
Hafez HM, Woolgar J, Robbs JV. Lower extremity arterial injury: results of 550 cases and review of risk factors associated with limb loss. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(6):1212–9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.113982.
Phifer TJ, Gerlock AJ Jr, Vekovius WA, Rich NM, McDonald JC. Amputation risk factors in concomitant superficial femoral artery and vein injuries. Ann Surg. 1984;199(2):241–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198402000-00018.
Tsurukiri J, Akamine I, Sato T, Sakurai M, Okumura E, Moriya M, Yamanaka H, Ohta S. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for uncontrolled haemorrahgic shock as an adjunct to haemostatic procedures in the acute care setting. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0205-8. (Erratum in: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):72. PMID: 26861070; PMCID: PMC4748599).
Kim AH, Vaughn CA, King DL, Maizels M, Meade P, Stack BC Jr. Assessment of operative competency for thyroidectomy: comparison of resident self-assessment vs attending surgeon assessment. Head Neck. 2020;42(12):3551–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26420.
Funding
The authors received no funding for conducting the current study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Grechenig, P., Wittig, U., di Vora, T. et al. Emergency approach to the femoral artery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 1337–1341 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02211-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02211-7