Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selective olfactory attention of a specialised predator to intraspecific chemical signals of its prey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prey-specialised predators have evolved specific cognitive adaptations that increase their prey searching efficiency. In particular, when the prey is social, selection probably favours the use of prey intraspecific chemical signals by predatory arthropods. Using a specialised ant-eating zodariid spider, Zodarion rubidum, which is known to prey on several ant species and possesses capture and venom adaptations more effective on Formicinae ants, we tested its ability to recognise chemical cues produced by several ant species. Using an olfactometer, we tested the response of Z. rubidum towards air with chemical cues from six different ant species: Camponotus ligniperda, Lasius platythorax and Formica rufibarbis (all Formicinae); and Messor structor, Myrmica scabrinodis and Tetramorium caespitum (all Myrmicinae). Z. rubidum was attracted to air carrying chemical cues only from F. rufibarbis and L. platythorax. Then, we identified that the spiders were attracted to airborne cues coming from the F. rufibarbis gaster and Dufour's gland, in particular. Finally, we found that among several synthetic blends, the decyl acetate and undecane mixture produced significant attraction of spiders. These chemicals are produced only by three Formicine genera. Furthermore, we investigated the role of these chemical cues in the communication of F. rufibarbis and found that this blend reduces their movement. This study demonstrates the chemical cognitive capacity of Z. rubidum to locate its ant prey using chemical signals produced by the ants. The innate capacity of Z. rubidum to olfactory detect different ant species is narrow, as it includes only two ant genera, confirming trophic specialisation at lower than subfamily level. The olfactory cue detected by Zodarion spiders is probably a component of the recruitment or trail pheromone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan RA, Elgar MA, Capon RJ (1996) Exploitation of an ant chemical alarm signal by the zodariid spider Habronestes bradleyi Walckenaer. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 263:69–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Astruc C, Julien JF, Errard C, Lenoir A (2004) Phylogeny of ants (Formicidae) based on morphology and DNA sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:880–893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Austin AD, Blest AD (1979) The biology of two Australian species of dinopid spider. J Zool 189:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnéres AG, Morgan ED, Clement JL (1991) Species-specific secretions of the Dufour glands of three species of Formicinae ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biochem Syst Ecol 19:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begström G, Löfqvist J (1968) Odour similarities between the slave-keeping ants Formica sanguinea and Polyergus rufescens and their slaves Formica rufa and Formica rufibarbis. J Insect Physiol 14:995–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begström G, Löfqvist J (1970) Chemical basis for odour communication in four species of Lasius ants. J Insect Physiol 16:2353–2375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D'Ettorre P, Errard C, Ibarra F, Francke W, Hefetz A (2000) Sneak in or repel your enemy: Dufour's gland repellent as a strategy for successful usurpation in the slave-maker Polyergus rufescens. Chemoecology 10:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1991) Chrosiothes tonala (Araneae: Theridiidae): a web-building spider specializing on termites. Psyche 98:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sayed AM (2011) The pherobase: database of insect pheromones and semiochemichals. http://www.pherobase.com. Accessed 14 December 2011

  • Feener DH, Jacobs LF, Schmidt JO (1996) Specialized parasitoid attracted to a pheromone of ants. Anim Behav 51:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham RA, Brand JM, Markovetz AJ (1979) Decyl acetate syntesis in the ant: Formica schaufussi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Biochem 9:331–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heller G (1974) Zur Biologie der ameisenfressen-den Spinne Callilepis nocturna Linnaeus 1758 (Araneae: Drassodidae). Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson BD, Morgan ED (1993) Insect chemical communication: pheromones and exocrine glands of ants. Chemoecology 4:125–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Pollard SD (1996) Predatory behavior of jumping spiders. Annu Rev Entomol 41:287–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Whitehouse MEA (1986) The biology of New Zealand and Queensland pirate spiders (Araneae: Mimetidae): aggressive mimicry: araneophagy and prey specialization. J Zool 25:249–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst C, Howse PE (1978) The use of kairomones by Megaponera foetens (Fab.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the detection of its termite prey. Anim Behav 26:1213–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loxdale HD, Lushai G, Harvey JA (2011) The evolutionary improbability of “generalism” in nature, with special reference to insects. Biol J Linn Soc 103(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martišová M, Bilde T, Pekár S (2009) Sex-specific kleptoparasitic foraging in ant-eating spiders. Anim Behav 78:1115–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrov MD (2011) Formicidae. Fauna Europaea. http://www.faunaeur.org/. Accessed 14 December 2011

  • Morrison LW, King JR (2004) Host location behavior in a parasitoid of imported fire ants. J Insect Behav 17:367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry K, Morgan ED (1979) Pheromones of ants: a review. Physiol Entomol 4:161–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pekár S (2004) Predatory behavior of two European ant-eating spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae). J Arachnol 32:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekár S (2005) Predatory characteristics of ant-eating Zodarion spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae): potential biological control agents. Biol Control 34:196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekár S, Brabec M (2012) Modern analysis of biological data. 2. Linear models with correlation in R. Masaryk University Press, Brno

  • Pekár S, Hruškova M, Lubin Y (2005) Can solitary spiders (Araneae) cooperate in prey capture? J Anim Ecol 74:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekár S, Toft S, Hruškova M, Mayntz D (2008) Dietary and prey-capture adaptations by which Zodarion germanicum: an ant-eating spider (Araneae: Zodariidae): specialises on the Formicinae. Naturwissenschaften 95:233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pekár S, Bilde T, Martišova M (2011) Intersexual trophic niche partitioning in an ant-eating spider (Araneae: Zodariidae). PLoS One 6:e14603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porter SD, Eastmond DA (1982) Euryopis coki (Theridiidae): a spider that prey on Pogonomyrmex ants. J Arachnol 10:275–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantala MJ, Kortet R, Kotiaho JS, Vainikka A, Suhonen J (2003) Condition dependence of pheromones and immune function in the grain beetle Tenebrio monitor. Funct Ecol 17:534–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnier FE, Wilson EO (1971) Chemical communication and "propaganda" in slave-maker ants. Science 172:267–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Řezáč M, Pekár S (2007) Evidence for woodlice-specialization in Dysdera spiders: behavioural versus developmental approaches. Physiol Entomol 32:367–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer L, Bolvin G (1999) Infochemicals mediating the foraging behaviour of Aleochara bilineata Gyllenhal adults: sources of attractants. Entomol Exp Appl 90:199–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schönrogge K, Napper EK, Birkett MA, Woodcock CM, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ (2008) Host recognition by the specialist hoverfly Microdon mutabilis: a social parasite of the ant Formica lemani. J Chem Ecol 34:168–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K, Vander Meer RK, Fadamiro HY (2011) Phorid fly, Pseudacteon tricuspis: response to alkylpyrazine analogs of a fire ant: Solenopsis invicta, alarm pheromone. J Insect Physiol 57:939–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steidle JL, van Loon JJA (2003) Dietary specialization and infochemical use in carnivorous arthropods: testing a concept. Entomol Exp Appl 108:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe MK, Turlings TCJ, Loughrin JH, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH (1995) The chemistry of eavesdropping, alarm, and deceit. PNAS 92:23–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RS, Glen DM, Symondson WOC (2008) Prey detection through olfaction by the soil-dwelling larvae of the carabid predator Pterostichus melanarius. Soil Biol Biochem 40:207–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Meer RK, Breed MD, Winston ML, Espelie KE (1998) Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, wasps, bees and termites. Westview Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte V, Disney RHL, Weissflog A, Maschwitz U (2010) Studies in European ant-decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae): ant alarm pheromone as host finding cue in Pseudacteon brevicauda: a parasite of Myrmica rubra (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). J Nat Hist 45:905–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyeth RC, Willows AOD (2006) Odours detected by rhinophores mediate orientation to flow in the nudibranch mollusc: Tritonia diomedea. J Exp Biol 209:1441–1453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeargan KV (1994) Biology of bolas spiders. Annu Rev Entomol 39:81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want thank to two anonymous reviewers for useful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61 137, Brno, Czech Republic

    Manuel Cárdenas & Stano Pekár

  2. Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo nám. 2, 166 10, Prague 6, Czech Republic

    Pavel Jiroš

Authors
  1. Manuel Cárdenas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pavel Jiroš
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stano Pekár
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Manuel Cárdenas or Stano Pekár.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cárdenas, M., Jiroš, P. & Pekár, S. Selective olfactory attention of a specialised predator to intraspecific chemical signals of its prey. Naturwissenschaften 99, 597–605 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-012-0938-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-012-0938-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation