Abstract
Non-injurious, collective ritualized displays may have evolved in some species of ants as a means of resolving contests for key resources, without causing a drain in worker numbers through injury. Colonies of the Australian meat ant, Iridomyrmex purpureus, deploy numerous workers to engage in collective displays, which are widely understood to be involved in maintaining exclusive territories. A combination of field surveys and behavioral assays revealed that display grounds do not delimit borders that define exclusive territories. Rather, the proportion of workers from a focal colony found in a quadrat declines monotonically with distance from the nest. In addition, we documented collective displays around food trees, where workers congregated in greater densities and engaged in more aggressive behavior. These results refute the assumption that colonies of I. purpureus establish territorial boundaries by collective displays. Rather these collective displays may be related to the defense of specific resources, including food trees and nest sites. The difference in the level of aggression among displaying workers at different locations may reflect a balance between the benefits of defending a particular resource and an unappreciated cost of escalation.
References
Adams ES (2016) Territoriality in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a review. Myrmecol News 23:101–118
Allan RA, Elgar MA, Capon RJ (1996) Exploitation of an ant chemical alarm signal by zodariid spider Habronestes bradleyi. Proc R Soc B 263:69–73
Blum MS (1985) Alarm pheromone. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Oxford, UK, pp. 193–224
Boulay R, Cerdá X, Simon T, Roldan M, Hefetz A (2007) Intraspecific competition in the ant Camponotus cruentatus: should we expect the ‘dear enemy’ effect? Anim Behav 74:985–993
Duncan-Weatherly AH (1953) Some aspects of the biology of the mound ant Iridomyrmex detectus (Smith). Aust J Zool 1:178–182
Enquist M, Leimar O (1987) Evolution of fighting behavior: the effect of variation in resource value. J Theor Biol 127:187–205
Ettershank G, Ettershank JA (1982) Ritualized fighting in the meat ant Iridomyrmex purpureus (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Aust Entomol Soc 21:97–102
Greaves T, Hughes RD (1974) The population biology of the meat ant. J Aust Entomol Soc 13:329–351
Greenslade PJM (1975) Dispersion and history of a population of the meat ant Iridomyrmex purpureus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Aust J Zool 23:495–510
Hardy ICW, Briffa M (2013) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hölldobler B (1976) Tournaments and slavery in a desert ant. Science 192:912–914
Hölldobler B (1979) Territories of the African weaver ant (Oecophylla longinoda [Latreille]): a field study. Z Tierpsychol 51:201–213
Holldobler B, Lumsden CJ (1980) Territorial strategies in ants. Science 210:732–739
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Jackson DA (1984) Ant distribution patterns in a Cameroonian cocoa plantation: investigation of the ant mosaic hypothesis. Oecologia (Berl) 62:318–324
Kubota M (1948) Observations on the habits of Messor aciculatus Smith (in Japanese). Shin Kontyu 1:226–230
Levings SC, Traneillo JFA (1982) Territoriality, nest dispersion and community structure in ants. Psyche 88:265–319
Maák I, Czekes Z, Erős K, Pálfi Z, Markó B (2020) Living on the edge: changes in the foraging strategy of a territorial ant species occurring with a rival supercolony - a case study. J Insect Behav 33:59–68
Mercier JL, Lenoir A, Dejean A (1997) Ritualized versus aggressive behaviors displayed by Polyrhachis laboriosa (F. Smith) during interspecific competition. Behav Process 41:39–50
Orbell PA, Potter JR, Elgar MA (2020) Collective displays as signals of relative colony size: meat ants, Iridomyrmex purpureus are economical with the truth. Anim Behav 159:29–36
Sherratt T, Mesterton-Gibbons M (2013) Models of group or multi-party contests. In: Hardy I, Briffa M (eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–46
Stevens, M (2013) Sensory ecology, behavior, and evolution. Oxford University Press
Thomas ML, Parry LJ, Allan RA, Elgar MA (1999) Colony recognition in Australian meat ants Iridomyrmex purpureus. Naturwissenchaften 86:87–92
van Wilgenburg E, Elgar MA (2007) The role of food source location in colony structure of the polydomous meat ant, Iridomyrmex purpureus. Insect Soc 54:5–10
Von Thienen W, Metzler D, Choe DH, Witte V (2014) Pheromone communication in ants: a detailed analysis of concentration-dependent decisions in three species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1611–1627
Wang Q, Goodger JQD, Woodrow IE, Elgar MA (2016) Location-specific cuticular hydrocarbon signals in a social insect. Proc R Soc B 283:20160310
Acknowledgments
We thank Senior Rangers Matt Wills and Ross Williams of Parks Victoria for their support at Serendip Sanctuary; Marianne Coquilleau, Mengdi Hao, and Qike Wang for their assistance in the field; Ben Phillips for statistical advice; and Xim Cerdá for his comments on the manuscript.
Data accessibility
The data supporting this article have been uploaded as part of the supplementary material.
Funding
SH is supported by a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by: Sean O'Donnell
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 184 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, S., Elgar, M.A. Territoriality in ants revisited: iconic collective displays reflect resource, not territorial defense in meat ants Iridomyrmex purpureus. Sci Nat 107, 38 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-020-01693-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-020-01693-y