Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Personality disorders in the community: Results from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being Part III

Relationships between specific type of personality disorder, Axis 1 mental disorders and physical conditions with disability and health consultations

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Background:

The aim of the present study was to examine in a national survey sample the risks of having a specific personality disorder (PD) and associations with gender, of having one or more physical conditions, of having one or more Axis 1 conditions, and of the severity (or degree) of disability. We also examined the association of specific PDs with having sought a consultation for health or mental health problems with a general practitioner (GP), a psychologist, or psychiatrist over the past 12 months.

Method:

Data were derived from the Australian National Mental Health and Well-Being Survey, conducted between May and August 1997. A stratified random sample of households was generated, from which all persons aged 18 or over were considered potential interviewees. There were 10,641 survey respondents, this representing a response rate of 78%. Each interviewee was asked 59 questions indexing specific ICD-10 PD criteria.

Results:

Logistic regressions identified that some specific PDs, especially borderline PD, were more strongly associated with having one or more Axis I conditions, greater mental disability and lost days of total and partial role functioning than having No PD, and that others, notably anankastic PD, were less likely to be associated with the same variables. Some specific PDs, again most notably borderline PD, were more associated than others, again most notably anankastic PD, with having sought mental health consultations from GPs, psychiatrists, and psychologists. By contrast, PD associations with gender, physical conditions, physical disability and health consultations with the three professional groups were weaker as reflected in the comparatively smaller odds ratios and were also less consistent than the pattern with the previously mentioned variables.

Conclusion:

The study reports findings from a nationwide survey and, as such, the data are less influenced by the selection and setting bias found in most other studies investigating these variables. The findings of the study do point to some specific PDs, such as borderline PD, being associated with greater Axis 1 psychopathology, disability and mental health consultations than others, such as anankastic PD. It appears that although anankastic PD in itself is associated with more disability than having No PD, it becomes significantly more disabling when it is associated with other comorbid PDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Third Edition. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D. C.

  2. American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Third Edition-Revised. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D. C.

  3. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth Edition. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D. C.

  4. Andreoli A, Gressot G, Aapro N, Tricot L, Gognalons MY (1989) Personality disorders as a predictor of outcome. J Pers Disord 3:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andrews G, Hall W, Teeson M, Henderson S (1999) The mental health of Australians. Mental Health Branch, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, Australia

  6. Andrews G, Henderson S, Hall W (2001) Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation. Overview of the Australian Mental Health Survey. Br J Psychiatry 178:145–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrews G, Slade T, Issakidis C (2002) Deconstructing current comorbidity: Data from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being. Br J Psychiatry 181:306–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1998a) Mental Health and Wellbeing: Profile of Adults, Australia, 1997. Australian Bureau of Statistics Canberra, Australia

  9. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1998b) Mental Health and Wellbeing of Adults, Australia. Confidentialised Unit Record File, 1997. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia

  10. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1999) The National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing Users Guide. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia

  11. Bank PA, Silk KR (2001) Axis I and axis II interactions. Curr Opin Psychiatry 14:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bijl RV, van Zessen G, Ravelli A, de Rijk C, Langendoen Y (1998a) The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS):Objectives and design. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 33:581–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bijl RV, Ravelli A, van Zessen G (1998b) Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population: Results of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 33:587–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Girolamo G, Reich JH (1993) Personality disorders: Epidemiology of mental disorders and psychosocial problems. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hueston WJ, Mainous AG, Schilling R (1996) Patients with personality disorders: functional status, health care utilization, and satisfaction with care. J Family Practice 42:54–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson HJ (1998) Assessment of personality disorder: Selected issues and directions. In: Perris C,McGorry PD (eds) Cognitive psychotherapy of psychotic and personality disorders: Handbook of theory and practice. Wiley, Chichester, pp 293–314

  17. Jackson HJ, Burgess, PM (2000) Personality disorders in the community: A report from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 35:531–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson HJ, Burgess PM (2002) Personality disorders in the community: Results from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Part II. Relationships between personality disorder, Axis I mental disorders and physical conditions with disability and health consultations. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 37:251–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson JG, Rabkin JG, Williams JBW, Remien RH, Gorman JM (2000) Difficulties in interpersonal relationships associated with personality disorders and Axis II disorders: A community-based longitudinal investigation. J Pers Disord 14:42–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, Wittchen HC (1994) Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the National Co-morbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51:8–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Loranger AW, Sartorius N, Andreoli A, Berger P, Buchheim P, Channabasavanna SM, Coid B, Dahl A, Diekstra RFW, Ferguson B, Jacobsberg LB, Mombour W, Pull C, Ono Y, Regier DA (1994) The International Personality Disorder Examination: The World Health Organization/Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration International Pilot Study of Personality Disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51:215–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Loranger AW, Janca A, Sartorius N (1997) Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders. The ICD-10 International Disorder Examination (IPDE). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  23. McGlashan TH, Grilo CM, Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, Shea MT, Morey LC, Zanarini MC, Stout RL (2000) The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: Baseline Axis I/II and II/II co-occurrence. Acta Psychiat Scand 102:256–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meltzer H, Gill B, Peltierew M (1994) OPCS survey of psychiatric morbidity in Great Britain, Bulletin No 1. OPCS Social Survey Division, London, Great Britain

  25. Nakao K, Gunderson JG, Phillips KA, Tanaka N, Yorifuji K, Takaishi, J, Nishimura T (1992) Functional impairment in personality disorders. J Pers Disord 6:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nestadt G, Romanoski AJ, Brown CH, Chahal R, Merchant A, Folstein MF, Gruenberg EM, McHugh PR (1991) DSM-III compulsive personality disorder: An epidemiological survey. Psych Med 21:461–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nestadt G, Romanoski AJ, Chahal R, Merchant A, Folstein MF, Gruenberg EM, McHugh PR (1990) An epidemiological study of histrionic personality disorder. Psych Med 20:413–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Paris J, Zweig-Frank H (2001) A 27-year follow-up of patients with borderline personality disorder. Comp Psychiatry 42:482–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Reich J, Boerstler H, Yates W, Nduaguba M (1989) Utilization of medical resources in persons with DSM-III personality disorders in a community sample. Int J Psychiatry in Med 19:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Robins LN, Regier DA (eds) (1991) Psychiatric disorders in America. Free Press, New York

  31. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Weissman MM, Orvaschel H, Gruenberg E, Burke JD, Regier DA (1984) Lifetime prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in three sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41:949–958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Samuels J, Eaton WW, Bienvenu OJ, Brown C, Costa PT Jr, Nestadt G (2002) Prevalence and correlates of personality disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 180:536–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Skodol A, Gunderson JG, McGlashan TH, Dyck IR, Stout RL, Bender DS, Grilo CM, Shea MT, Zanarini MC, Morey LC, Sanislow CA, Oldham JM (2002) Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 159:276–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Slade T, Peters L, Schneiden V, Andrews G (1998) The International Personality Disorder Examination Questionnaire (IPDEQ): Preliminary data on its utility as a screener for anxious personality disorder. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 17:84–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith TL, Benjamin LS (2002) The functional impairment associated with personality disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 15:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Torgersen S, Kringlen E, Cramer,V (2001) The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:590–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vollebergh WAM, Iedema J, Bijl RV, de Graaf R, Smit F, Ormei J (2001) The structure and stability of common mental disorders. The NEMESIS study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:597–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wells JE, Bushnell JA, Hornblow AR, Joyce PR, Oakley-Browne MA (1989) Christchurch Psychiatric Epidemiological Study: Part 1: Methodology and lifetime prevalence for specific psychiatric disorders. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 23:315–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. World Health Organization (1992) International Classification of Diseases. 10th Edition (ICD-10). World Health Organization, Geneva

  40. World Health Organization (1994) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): Researcher’s Manual. World Health Organization, Geneva

  41. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Mental Health and Substance Abuse (1997) SCS 24: Field Questionnaire. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zweig-Frank H, Paris J (2002) Predictors of outcome in a 27-year follow-up of patients with borderline personality disorder. Comp Psychiatry 43:103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010,Victoria, Australia

    Henry J. Jackson MA, MA (Clin.Psych.), PhD, FAPS

  2. Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria, Parkville (Victoria), Australia

    Philip M. Burgess MA (Clin.Psych.), PhD, FAPS

  3. Dept. of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton (Victoria), Australia

    Philip M. Burgess MA (Clin.Psych.), PhD, FAPS

  4. Dept. of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville (Victoria), Australia

    Philip M. Burgess MA (Clin.Psych.), PhD, FAPS

Authors
  1. Henry J. Jackson MA, MA (Clin.Psych.), PhD, FAPS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philip M. Burgess MA (Clin.Psych.), PhD, FAPS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry J. Jackson MA, MA (Clin.Psych.), PhD, FAPS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, H.J., Burgess, P.M. Personality disorders in the community: Results from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being Part III. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39, 765–776 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0821-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0821-x

Key words

Search

Navigation